『장자』의 리더십으로 통찰하는 21세기 세계화와 다문화의 이슈 — 어떻게 소통하고, 생명의식을 회복할 것인가
As 『Zhuangzi』 Leadership Viewed the Issue of Globalization and Multiculturalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Each country gradually has becoming different culture because of the 21st century Globalization has accelerated, in addition, we became a structure of governance and management which cannot be done separately from neo-liberalism. It is true that globalization has positive effects for humanity, But it is true that globalization also does raised certain realistic fears about some harm that it brought. Therefore, in order to solve these problems, It is a great significance that looking at the issues of globalization and multiculturalism from the insight of Chinese classics 『Zhuangzi』. If so, what kind of leadership shows from the 『Zhuangzi』? In the warring states period, a week country Song was threatened with powerful nations. Crazy mixed up world at times. How does they survive in the world can be threatened with life? 『Zhuangzi』 is written by using humor or a fable. The message is, Freedom and happiness ought to be restored to public life. In that sense, 『Zhuangzi』 shows how to overcome the tough world with it is exemplifying the theory with a specific example. 『Zhuangzi』 is a book that often seems eccentric and confused, but actually has a very sharp mind. It has amazing insight about contemporary. I think we can say that is a virtues of leadership. Discussion on multiculture in Korea started in side of human rights protection for marriage. However the concept of 21st multiculturalism have changed greatly with rapid free trade and globalization. So, the heart of the problem is not limited on this subject, it is not simple. Excessive competition has destroyed people's moral fibre, just only winner takes all structures. Because free trade made it easier for economically stronger countries to overpower and exploit weaker ones. Only money have become the standard for all of the people. The traditional sentiment(情) of Korean community is gradually disappeared. The number of foreign residents in South Korea has already passed the two-million mark on the back of the influx of migrant workers and foreign wives for koreans. Koreans and foreigners associated with the job of conflict will be more serious social problem. 『Zhuangzi』 showed leadership through different eyes, so I wish to discuss issue of globalization and multiculturalism in Korea through it.
Abstract
Each country gradually has becoming different culture because of the 21st century Globalization has accelerated, in addition, we became a structure of governance and management which cannot be done separately from neo-liberalism. It is true that globalization has positive effects for humanity, But it is true that globalization also does raised certain realistic fears about some harm that it brought. Therefore, in order to solve these problems, It is a great significance that looking at the issues of globalization and multiculturalism from the insight of Chinese classics 『Zhuangzi』. If so, what kind of leadership shows from the 『Zhuangzi』? In the warring states period, a week country Song was threatened with powerful nations. Crazy mixed up world at times. How does they survive in the world can be threatened with life? 『Zhuangzi』 is written by using humor or a fable. The message is, Freedom and happiness ought to be restored to public life. In that sense, 『Zhuangzi』 shows how to overcome the tough world with it is exemplifying the theory with a specific example. 『Zhuangzi』 is a book that often seems eccentric and confused, but actually has a very sharp mind. It has amazing insight about contemporary. I think we can say that is a virtues of leadership. Discussion on multiculture in Korea started in side of human rights protection for marriage. However the concept of 21st multiculturalism have changed greatly with rapid free trade and globalization. So, the heart of the problem is not limited on this subject, it is not simple. Excessive competition has destroyed people's moral fibre, just only winner takes all structures. Because free trade made it easier for economically stronger countries to overpower and exploit weaker ones. Only money have become the standard for all of the people. The traditional sentiment(情) of Korean community is gradually disappeared. The number of foreign residents in South Korea has already passed the two-million mark on the back of the influx of migrant workers and foreign wives for koreans. Koreans and foreigners associated with the job of conflict will be more serious social problem. 『Zhuangzi』 showed leadership through different eyes, so I wish to discuss issue of globalization and multiculturalism in Korea through it.
참고문헌 (37)
- 김달진, "莊子" (1987), 문학동네
- 김송희, "세계를 향한 한국교육-구 세계화 속의 한국교육" (2015), 생각나눔
- 김송희, "팍스 아메리카의 침묵" (2015), 생각나눔
- 金松姬, "「莊子」與漢代文學", 博士, pp.2003
- 김송희, "陶淵明詩를 통해 본 ‘莊子’의 生命意識", 中國文化硏究, 4 (2004), 中國文化硏究學會
- 김충열, "노장철학강의" (1993), 예문서원
- 김항배, "莊子哲學精解" (2001), 불광출판부
- 리우샤오간, "莊子哲學" (2000), 소나무
- 서덕희, "문화의 차원에 비추어 온 다문화 사회로서의 한국의 특징" (2013), 고려대 아세아문제연구소
- 서창록, "협력과 공존의 뉴 패러다임, 글로벌 거버넌스", 고대 TODAY, 2010년 가을, 42호, ~ (2010)
- 쑹홍빙, "화폐전쟁" (2008), 랜덤하우스
- 안동림, "莊子" (2006), 현암사
- 엘런 H. 브라운, "달러", pp.88~ (2009), AK
- 예츠청, "중국의 세계전략" (2005), 21세기 북스
- 오경석, "한국에서의 다문화주의" (2007), 한울
- 李澤厚, "中國美學史" (1992), 대한교과서주식회사
- 임재창, "신자유주의 등장-대처리즘과 레이거노믹스", Economist, ~ (2011)
- 한국과 서구의 다문화 사회의 차이와 정책비교, "임형백", 숙대 다문화 통합연구소, ~ (2009)
- 陳鼓應, "老莊新論" (1997), 소나무
- 다문화 사회의 이론적 패러다임과 국가별 유형비교, "최종열", 한국여성정책 연구원, 한국 사회학회, ~ (2008)
- 페테르 빈터호프 슈푸르크, "바벨탑에 갇힌 세계화" (2010), 21세기 북스
- 피터 드리커, "자본주의 이후의 사회" (1992), 한국경제신문사
- 헨리 조지, "진보와 빈곤" (2012), 경북대학교 출판부
- 韓非, "韓非子" (2002), 한길사
- 徐復觀, "中國藝術精神, 徐復觀先生全集四" (1985), 臺灣中和堂
- 李霞著, "生死智慧-道家生命觀硏究" (2004), 人民出版社
- 張雲華, "先秦兩漢道家思想硏究" (1998), 吉林敎育出版社
- 陶東風, "中國古代心理美學六論" (1999), 百花文藝出版社
- 葉自成, "中國大戰略" (2003), 中國社會科學出版社
- Alvin Toffler, "Revolutionary Wealth" (2006), Doubleday
- Amy Chua, "The Triple Package" (2013), Pengun Books
- Chalmers Johnson, "Blowback-The costs and Consequences of American Empire" (2004), HOLT
- Jean Lipman Blumen, "The Allure of Toxie Leaders" (2005), Oxford
- Laden, Anthony Simon, "Multiculturalism and Political Theory" (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Lester C. Thurow, "Head to Head" (1992), William Morrow and Company Inc
- Lester C. Thurow, "The Future of Capitalism" (1996), Penguin Book
- Noah Feldman, "Orthodox Paradox", The New York Times Magazine, 2007년7월 22일, ~ (2007)
