본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

투입산출분석을 이용한 중국 문화산업의 파급효과에 관한 연구

A Study on Ripple Effects of Chinese Cultural Industry by Using Input-output Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The cultural industry is not only an important part of the national soft power, but also an important component of the national comprehensive strength. With the development of the economy and the improvement of the material living standard, the demand for cultural products has been increasing continuously. Recent years, China’s cultural industry has been fast development, the total scale of the cultural industry has steadily increased. This paper used China’s 2012 Input-output table to analyse the Chinese cultural industry by dividing the Chinese cultural industry into cultural services and cultural services. The results of the analysis are shown below: first, the other industries in the national economy have very low input coefficients for the culture industry, but the need for the second industry is the highest. Second, In production inducement coefficients, the cultural industry has the highest production inducement effect for itself. Third, the coefficient of influence of cultural manufacturing is higher than the average level of the whole industry, and that means the production demand and ripple effects of other industries are strong in the national economy. Forth, the sensitivity coefficient of cultural manufacturing industry and cultural service industry is smaller than the average level of the whole industry, the production of other industries is weak in promoting the development of cultural industry, the cultural industry is not limited to other industries. Fifth, the production inducement coefficient of the cultural manufacturing industry and cultural service industry is the highest, followed by the value added induction coefficient and import inducement coefficient are the lowest. In addition, cultural products have the highest dependence on exports, and cultural services have the highest dependence on consumption. In the final product of cultural manufacturing and cultural services industry, the production induction coefficient is higher than added value induced coefficient, the Induction coefficient is smallest. At the same time, the dependence of cultural manufacturing on exports is the highest, and the dependence of cultural services on consumption is the highest. The last part of this paper lists some recommendations for development of Chinese cultural industries.

Abstract

The cultural industry is not only an important part of the national soft power, but also an important component of the national comprehensive strength. With the development of the economy and the improvement of the material living standard, the demand for cultural products has been increasing continuously. Recent years, China’s cultural industry has been fast development, the total scale of the cultural industry has steadily increased. This paper used China’s 2012 Input-output table to analyse the Chinese cultural industry by dividing the Chinese cultural industry into cultural services and cultural services. The results of the analysis are shown below: first, the other industries in the national economy have very low input coefficients for the culture industry, but the need for the second industry is the highest. Second, In production inducement coefficients, the cultural industry has the highest production inducement effect for itself. Third, the coefficient of influence of cultural manufacturing is higher than the average level of the whole industry, and that means the production demand and ripple effects of other industries are strong in the national economy. Forth, the sensitivity coefficient of cultural manufacturing industry and cultural service industry is smaller than the average level of the whole industry, the production of other industries is weak in promoting the development of cultural industry, the cultural industry is not limited to other industries. Fifth, the production inducement coefficient of the cultural manufacturing industry and cultural service industry is the highest, followed by the value added induction coefficient and import inducement coefficient are the lowest. In addition, cultural products have the highest dependence on exports, and cultural services have the highest dependence on consumption. In the final product of cultural manufacturing and cultural services industry, the production induction coefficient is higher than added value induced coefficient, the Induction coefficient is smallest. At the same time, the dependence of cultural manufacturing on exports is the highest, and the dependence of cultural services on consumption is the highest. The last part of this paper lists some recommendations for development of Chinese cultural industries.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 사혜민, "3단계 DEA 모형을 이용한 중국 문화산업의기술효율성에 대한 연구", 동북아 문화연구, 1(52), pp.41~64 (2017), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  2. 徐正敎, "文化産業投資의 經濟的 波及效果分析", 경제학연구, 51(1), pp.3~87 (2003), 한국경제학회
  3. 심재희, "문화산업의 경제적 파급효과에 관한 연구", 산업경제연구, 26(6), pp.2731~2750 (2013), 한국산업경제학회
  4. 이데 마사히로, "excel을 활용한 산업연관분석 입문" (2011), 제주대학교출판부
  5. 유유개, "중국 문화산업 투자의 경제적 파급효과", 문화산업연구, 17(2), pp.123~128 (2017), 한국문화산업학회
  6. 한국은행, "산업연관분석해설", ~ (2014)
  7. W. W. Leontief, "Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), pp.105~125 (1936)
  8. 重庆社会科学 服务重庆市委决策系列选题研究小组, "我国文化产业政策轨迹及其趋势判断", 重庆社会科学研究, (5)통권 : 258, pp.18~25 (2016)
  9. 张艳辉, "上海市创意产业关联效应的实证分析", 中国软科学, (3), pp.63~87 (2008)
  10. 李连友, "基于投入产出方法的北京市文化创意产业对经济贡献分析", 中央财经大学学报, (6), pp.86~91 (2012)
  11. 林秀梅, "吉林省文化产业的关联拉动效应分析 — 基于投入产出模型", 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), (3)통권 : 269, pp.12~117 (2014)
  12. 蔡旺春, "中国文化产业关联程度与波及效应分析", 统计与决策, (19)통권 : 319, pp.96~98 (2010)
  13. 周强, "中国文化创意产业关联程度与波及效果分析 — 基于投入产出方法", 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 31(1), pp.9~15 (2014)
  14. 张亚丽, "中国文化产业的关联拉动效应分析", 统计与决策, (11)통권 : 431, pp.134~137 (2015)
  15. 国家统计局设管司, "文化及相关产业分类", ~ (2004)
  16. 国家统计局, "国民经济行业分类(GB", T 4754-2011)』

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)