Distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia and its association with other anomalies
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To investigate the distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and its association with other anomalies. Methods: This study included 249 Korean patients with HFM, whose charts, photographs, radiographs, and/or computed tomography scans acquired during 1998–2018 were available from Seoul National University Hospital and Dental Hospital. Prevalence according to sex, side involvement, degree of mandibular deformity, compensatory growth of the mandibular body, and Angle’s classification, and its association with other anomalies were statistically analyzed. Results: Prevalence was not different between male and female patients (55.0% vs. 45.0%, p > 0.05). Unilateral HFM (UHFM) was more prevalent than bilateral HFM (BHFM) (86.3% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Although distribution of the Pruzansky–Kaban types differed significantly in patients with UHFM (I, 53.0%; IIa, 18.6%; IIb, 24.7%; III, 3.7%; p < 0.001), no difference was observed in occurrence between the right and left sides (52.6% vs. 47.4%, p > 0.05). Among patients with BHFM, prevalence of different Pruzansky–Kaban types on the right and left sides was greater than that of the same type on both sides (67.6% vs. 32.4%, p < 0.05). Despite hypoplasia of the condyle/ramus complex, compensatory growth of the mandibular body on the ipsilateral side occurred in 35 patients (14.1%). Class I and II molar relationships were more prevalent than Class III molar relationships (93.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Forty-eight patients (19.3%) had other anomalies, with 50.0% and 14.4% in the BHFM and UHFM groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with HFM require individualized diagnosis and treatment planning because of diverse phenotypes and associations with other anomalies.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and its association with other anomalies. Methods: This study included 249 Korean patients with HFM, whose charts, photographs, radiographs, and/or computed tomography scans acquired during 1998–2018 were available from Seoul National University Hospital and Dental Hospital. Prevalence according to sex, side involvement, degree of mandibular deformity, compensatory growth of the mandibular body, and Angle’s classification, and its association with other anomalies were statistically analyzed. Results: Prevalence was not different between male and female patients (55.0% vs. 45.0%, p > 0.05). Unilateral HFM (UHFM) was more prevalent than bilateral HFM (BHFM) (86.3% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Although distribution of the Pruzansky–Kaban types differed significantly in patients with UHFM (I, 53.0%; IIa, 18.6%; IIb, 24.7%; III, 3.7%; p < 0.001), no difference was observed in occurrence between the right and left sides (52.6% vs. 47.4%, p > 0.05). Among patients with BHFM, prevalence of different Pruzansky–Kaban types on the right and left sides was greater than that of the same type on both sides (67.6% vs. 32.4%, p < 0.05). Despite hypoplasia of the condyle/ramus complex, compensatory growth of the mandibular body on the ipsilateral side occurred in 35 patients (14.1%). Class I and II molar relationships were more prevalent than Class III molar relationships (93.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Forty-eight patients (19.3%) had other anomalies, with 50.0% and 14.4% in the BHFM and UHFM groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with HFM require individualized diagnosis and treatment planning because of diverse phenotypes and associations with other anomalies.
참고문헌 (30)
- Grabb WC, "The first and second branchial arch syndrome", Plast Reconstr Surg, 36, pp.485~508 (1965)
- Longacre JJ, "The surgical management of the first and second branchial arch syndrome", Br J Plast Surg, 18, pp.243~253 (1965)
- Converse JM, "On hemifacial microsomia. The first and second branchial arch syndrome", Plast Reconstr Surg, 51, pp.268~279 (1973)
- Figueroa AA, "The external ear, mandible and other components of hemifacial microsomia", J Maxillofac Surg, 10, pp.200~211 (1982)
- Cousley RR, "Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia", Br J Plast Surg, 50, pp.536~551 (1997)
- Gougoutas AJ, "Hemifacial microsomia : clinical features and pictographic representations of the OMENS classification system", Plast Reconstr Surg, 120, pp.112~120 (2007)
- Poswillo D, "Hemorrhage in development of the face", Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 11, pp.61~81 (1975)
- Rollnick BR, "Hemifacial microsomia and variants : pedigree data", Am J Med Genet, 15, pp.233~253 (1983)
- Hartsfield JK, "Review of the etiologic heterogeneity of the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum(Hemifacial Microsomia)", Orthod Craniofac Res, 10, pp.121~128 (2007)
- Kaban LB, "Correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child: a follow-up study", Cleft Palate J, 23(Suppl 1), pp.50~52 (1986)
- Kaban LB, "Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child", Plast Reconstr Surg, 82, pp.9~19 (1988)
- Choi JY, "Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction", J Maxillofac Surg, 29, pp.165~173 (2001)
- Kim S, "New approach for the surgico-orthodontic treatment of hemifacial microsomia", J Craniofac Surg, 23, pp.957~963 (2012)
- Suh J, "Mandibular distraction in unilateral craniofacial microsomia : longitudinal results until the completion of growth", Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, pp.1244~1252 (2013)
- Vento AR, "The O.M.E.N.S. classification of hemifacial microsomia", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 28, pp.68~76 (1991)
- Horgan JE, "OMENS-Plus : analysis of craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in hemifacial microsomia", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 32, pp.405~412 (1995)
- Tuin AJ, "Clarifying the relationships among the different features of the OMENS+ classification in craniofacial microsomia", Plast Reconstr Surg, 135, pp.149e~156e (2015)
- Keogh IJ, "Isolated microtia as a marker for unsuspected hemifacial microsomia", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 133, pp.997~1001 (2007)
- Poon CC, "Hemifacial microsomia : use of the OMENS-Plus classification at the Royal Children's Hospital of Melbourne", Plast Reconstr Surg, 111, pp.1011~1018 (2003)
- Pruzansky S, "Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike", Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 5, pp.120~129 (1969)
- Kaban LB, "Mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia : a reassessment of the Pruzansky and Kaban classification", Plast Reconstr Surg, 134, pp.657e~658e (2014)
- Mulliken JB, "Analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia in childhood", Clin Plast Surg, 14, pp.91~100 (1987)
- Baek SH, "The determinants of successful distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia from longitudinal results", J Craniofac Surg, 16, pp.549~558 (2005)
- Park JU, "Statistical analysis using the OMENS classification in Oriental patients with hemifacial microsomia: a comparative analysis with Western centers", Ann Plast Surg, 72, pp.50~55 (2014)
- Xu S, "The influence of gender and laterality on the incidence of hemifacial microsomia", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.384~387 (2015)
- Heike CL, "Characterizing facial features in individuals with craniofacial microsomia : a systematic approach for clinical research", Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 106, pp.915~926 (2016)
- Caron CJJM, "Craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in craniofacial microsomia : a multicenter study of 755 patients", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 45, pp.1302~1310 (2017)
- Fan WS, "An association between hemifacial microsomia and facial clefting", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 63, pp.330~334 (2005)
- Takahashi-Ichikawa N, "Evaluation of mandibular hypoplasia in patients with hemifacial microsomia : a comparison between panoramic radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 50, pp.381~387 (2013)
- Tuin J, "Distinguishing Goldenhar syndrome from craniofacial macrosomia", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.1887~1892 (2015)