Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: A cone-beam computed tomography study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To evaluate the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) in terms of the angulation and bone depth and thickness according to sex, age, and sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in a Colombian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Accordingly, the optimal site for miniscrew insertion in this area was determined. Methods: This descriptive, retrospective study included 64 hemi-arches of 34 patients. On CBCT images, the angulation, buccal bone depth (4 and 6 mm from the cementoenamel junction [CEJ] of MBS), and buccal bone thickness (6 and 11 mm from the CEJ of MBS) were measured at the mesial and distal roots of the mandibular first and second molars. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the angulation, depth, and thickness of MBS between male and female patients. The values for the bone around the distal root of the mandibular second molar were significantly greater than the other values. The osseous characteristics were significantly better in participants aged 16–24 years. Class III patients exhibited the best osseous characteristics, with the bone depth at 6 mm being significantly different from that in Class I and Class II patients. Although values tended to be greater in patients with low angles, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: MBS provides an optimal bone surface for miniscrew insertion, with better osseous characteristics at the distal root of the mandibular second molar, 4 mm from CEJ. Adolescent patients, Class III patients, and patients with a low angle exhibit the most favorable osseous characteristics in the MBS area.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) in terms of the angulation and bone depth and thickness according to sex, age, and sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in a Colombian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Accordingly, the optimal site for miniscrew insertion in this area was determined. Methods: This descriptive, retrospective study included 64 hemi-arches of 34 patients. On CBCT images, the angulation, buccal bone depth (4 and 6 mm from the cementoenamel junction [CEJ] of MBS), and buccal bone thickness (6 and 11 mm from the CEJ of MBS) were measured at the mesial and distal roots of the mandibular first and second molars. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the angulation, depth, and thickness of MBS between male and female patients. The values for the bone around the distal root of the mandibular second molar were significantly greater than the other values. The osseous characteristics were significantly better in participants aged 16–24 years. Class III patients exhibited the best osseous characteristics, with the bone depth at 6 mm being significantly different from that in Class I and Class II patients. Although values tended to be greater in patients with low angles, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: MBS provides an optimal bone surface for miniscrew insertion, with better osseous characteristics at the distal root of the mandibular second molar, 4 mm from CEJ. Adolescent patients, Class III patients, and patients with a low angle exhibit the most favorable osseous characteristics in the MBS area.
참고문헌 (22)
- Chang C, "Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva", Angle Orthod, 85, pp.905~910 (2015)
- Hee-Yeon Suh, "Use of mini-implants to avoid maxillary surgery for Class III mandibular prognathic patient: a long-term post-retention case", 대한치과교정학회지, 44(6), pp.342~349 (2014), 대한치과교정학회
- Kanomi R, "Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage", J Clin Orthod, 31, pp.763~767 (1997)
- Ramírez-Ossa DM, "An umbrella review of the effectiveness of temporary anchorage devices and the factors that contribute to their success or failure", J Evid Based Dent Pract, 20, pp.101402~ (2020)
- Rao P, "Primary stability : the password of implant integration", J Dent Implant, 2, pp.103~109 (2012)
- Migliorati M, "Miniscrew design and bone characteristics : an experimental study of primary stability", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.228~234 (2012)
- Ozdemir F, "Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.190~196 (2013)
- Farnsworth D, "Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.495~503 (2011)
- Yang L, "Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 147, pp.725~737 (2015)
- Becker K, "Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 156, pp.345~354 (2019)
- Murugesan A, "Comparison of bone thickness in infrazygomatic crest area at various miniscrew insertion angles in Dravidian population-A cone beam computed tomography study", Int Orthod, 18, pp.105~114 (2020)
- Elshebiny T, "Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, pp.505~511 (2018)
- Nucera R, "Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults", Angle Orthod, 87, pp.745~751 (2017)
- Kim YH, "Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite", Am J Orthod, 65, pp.586~611 (1974)
- Kim YH, "Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator : an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis", Am J Orthod, 73, pp.619~633 (1978)
- Baumgaertel S, "Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.230~235 (2009)
- Wu TY, "Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage : a study of 414 samples in Taiwan", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.1595~1599 (2009)
- Huang C, "3D Cortical Bone Anatomy of the Mandibular Buccal Shelf : a CBCT study to define sites for extra-alveolar bone screws to treat Class III malocclusion", Int J Orthod Implantol, 41, pp.74~82 (2016)
- Kolge NE, "Tomographic mapping of buccal shelf area for optimum placement of bone screws : a three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography evaluation", APOS Trends Orthod, 9, pp.241~245 (2019)
- Alves N, "Study of the mucosa thickness of the retromolar triangle to facilitate the installation planning of mini-implants in the region", Int J Odontostomatol, 6, pp.175~179 (2012)
- Lin J, "Creative orthodontics:blending the Damon System & TADs to manage difficult malocclusions", pp.339~ (2017), Yong Chieh Enterprise Co
- Plaza SP, "Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern", Dental Press J Orthod, 24, pp.63~72 (2019)