본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『齊民要術』動量詞使用情況察

Research on the Verbal Quantifiers of Qi Min Yao Shu

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

量詞在魏晉南北朝時期發展最爲顯著,以表示天然單位的個體量詞爲主要標誌的名量詞,在前期初步運用的基礎上得到廣泛使用,進入全面成熟的階段,動量詞則由萌芽狀態轉入迅速發展,?且呈現逐步成熟的性質。可以說,一個完整的量詞使用範疇已經形成。但量詞的兩大分類名量詞和動量詞中,由於動量詞相對於名量詞出現較?,且在數量上也遠不如名量詞?富,所以曆來對於量詞的?究就出現了重名量輕動量的局面,而本文之所以選擇『齊民要術』中的動量詞加以?究,主要是因爲『齊民要術』是中國現存最完整的一部古代農業科學技術專著,影響巨大,就語言風格來說,其中的口語資料,十分寶貴而?富,而該書相比同時期的『水經注』,『洛陽伽藍記』,『世說新語』,『?氏家訓』等文獻典籍,其中的動量詞更爲?富多樣。目前,雖然針對『齊民要術』量詞的?究無論是單篇文章還是碩博論文都有了一些成果,但都是有關『齊民要術』中的名量詞方面的?究,而針對其動量詞的專門?究?未引起足?重視和深入展開。故本文將以中古時期的農書『齊民要術』??究對象,對其中的動量詞,進行定量定性地窮盡性地整理分析。 文章從『齊民要術』中動量詞的類型,動量詞的數量表示法,以及動量詞的語法功能等方面詳細描寫了『齊民要術』中的動量詞的面貌,?結合動量詞的傳承情況,盡可能地觀察『齊民要術』中的動量詞的共?,??發展情況。從動量詞的分類上看,動量詞的各種類型『齊民要術』中都有出現,其中不僅有專用動量詞,也有借用的動量詞,從量詞的傳承情況來看,『齊民要術』中?有沿用上古的動量詞,也有中古時期新生的動量詞。相比而言,『齊民要術』中的動量詞比同時期的文獻『世說新語』,『洛陽伽藍記』等都要?富得多。從動作數量表示法方面來看,『齊民要術』中的動量詞表示法有“數+動”,“動+數+量”,“數+量+動”,“數+量”,“動+數”5種格式,以數據來看,魏晉南北朝時期動量表示仍然以“數+動”爲常,但與此同時,“動+數+量”和“數+量+動”表示法也在逐步繁榮。最後從動量結構以及數量結構所承擔的語法功能方面來看,動量結構主要承擔謂語的語法功能,但『齊民要術』中亦可做主語,謂語,定語。而數量結構和動詞的關系則是數量結構可以做狀語,補語,省略動詞時亦可做主語,謂語,後面接名詞時,亦可做定語。 綜上所述,我們希望能通過對『齊民要術』中的動量詞系統而全面地描寫,?動量詞的?究提供一點?助。

Abstract

The quantifier has developed most notably in the period of the Wei, Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties. The nominal measure word, which represents the individual quantifier of the natural unit, is widely used on the basis of preliminary application and enters the stage of full maturity, the verbal measure word is rapidly developed from the bud and has the nature of gradual maturity. The category of quantifier use has been formed, But in the two classifiers, the verbal quantifiers is relatively late and is far less abundant than the noun quantifier, so there has always been a situation of weak study on verbal measure word in the study of measure word. The reason why we choose the verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu is mainly because "Qi Min Yao Shu" is the most complete ancient agricultural science and technology monograph in ancient China, which has great influence. In terms of language style, the oral information is very valuable and rich, while the book is compared with the same period's document literature. At present, although there are some achievements in the study of the quantifier of Qi Min Yao Shu, all of these researches are related to noun quantifier in Qi Min Yao Shu. This paper, based on the traditional lexicology, modern linguistics and the theory of semantics, carries out the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu. From the types of verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu, the representation of verbal quantifiers and the grammatical function of the verbal quantifiers, the article describes the appearance of the verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu, and the development of the verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu as far as possible in combination with the inheritance of verbal quantifiers. From the classification of verbal quantifiers, all kinds of verbal quantifiers of Qi Min Yao Shu appeared, including not only the special verbal quantifiers, but also the borrowed verbal quantifiers. From the inheritance of verbal quantifiers, there are both the verbal quantifiers in ancient times and the new verbal quantifiers in the middle ancient times. Verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu are much richer than those literature of the same period. From the point of the expression of action quantity, the verbal quantifiers expression in Qi Min Yao Shu has "number+verb","verb+number+verbal quantifier","number+verbal quantifier+verb","number+verbal quantifier", "verb+number". In terms of data, the expression "verb+number+verbal quantifier","number+verbal quantifier+verb" are more flourishing than before. We hope to give a comprehensive description of the system of verbal quantifiers in Qi Min Yao Shu and provide some helps for the research of verbal quantifiers.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 金桂桃, "宋元明清動量詞研巧" (2007), 武漢大學出版社
  2. 黎錦熙, "新著國語文法" (2007), 湖南敎育出版社
  3. 陳穎, "蘇軾作品量詞研究" (2003), 巴蜀弓社
  4. 潘允中, "漢語語法史概要" (1982), 中州書畫社
  5. 王力, "漢語史稿" (1980), 中華書局
  6. 劉世儒, "魏晉南北朝量詞研究" (1965), 中華書局
  7. 南北, "論中古和近代漢語的高頻動量詞", 長江大學學報, (7) (2014)
  8. 李小平, "『齊民要術』指稱植物的量詞“科”及其演變", 衡陽師範學院學報, (4) (2011)
  9. 李小平, "『齊民要術』“鬥,升”類量詞稱量對象及成因", 雲夢學刊, (6) (2011)
  10. 李建平, "動量詞“斤”產生的時代及其來源—兼論“大小行”的語源", 中國語文, (2) (2011)
  11. 於立昌, "也談動量詞“過”的產生及發展———兼與金穎先生商榷", 殷都學刊, (1) (2011)
  12. 馮青, "『齊民要術』個體量詞使用特點", 昭通師範高等專科學校學報, (6) (2010)
  13. 黎潔瓊, "近三十年中古漢語量詞研究述評", 中南大學學報, (5) (2010)
  14. 李小平, "『齊民要術』數量表示法", 重慶科學, (1) (2007)
  15. 李小平, "『齊民要術』中的量詞及其特點", 廣西社會科學, (9) (2006)
  16. 葉桂郴, "漢語動量詞形成的原因", 古漢語研究, (3) (2007)
  17. 蔣宗霞, "動量詞的語義分類及組合關系", 阜陽師範學院學報, (3) (2006)
  18. 金穎, "試論動量詞“過”的產生、發展及其相關問題", 古漢語研究, (2) (2006)
  19. 於立昌, "漢語動量詞產生時間問題再探討", 淮北煤炭師範學院學報, (6) (2009)
  20. 邵勤, "動量詞研究綜述", 江蘇教育學院學報, (4) (2005)
  21. 李建平, "唐五代動量詞初探", 泰山學院學報, (4) (2003)
  22. 殷國光, "上古漢語中數詞計動量的兩種位置的比較", 古漢語研究, (1) (2002)
  23. 王紹新, "從幾個例詞看唐代動量詞的發展", 古漢語研究, (2) (1997)
  24. 邵敬敏, "動量詞的語義分析及其與動詞的選擇關系", 中國語文, (2) (1996)
  25. 張美蘭, "論『五燈會元』中同形動量詞", 南京師大學院, (1) (1996)
  26. 邵敬敏, "量詞的語義分析及其與名詞的雙向選擇", 中國語文, (3) (1993)
  27. 吳伯芳, "關於動量詞的起源", 語文輔導, (1) (1990)
  28. 唐鈺明, "古漢語動量表示法探源", 古漢語研究, (1) (1990)
  29. 陳穎, "宋代動量詞研究", 석사, pp.2001
  30. 彭文芳, "元代量詞研究", 석사, pp.2001
  31. 遊黎, "唐五代量詞研究", 석사, pp.2002
  32. 邵勤, "動量詞的認知研究", 석사, pp.2005
  33. 葉桂郴, "『六十種曲』和明代文獻的量詞", 석사, pp.2005
  34. 賀芳芳, "『齊民要術』量詞研究", 석사, pp.2005
  35. 亓文香, "從『世說新語』『搜神記』等看魏晉南北朝物量詞表示法", 박사, pp.2005
  36. 莊素真, "一組專用動量詞的發展演變研究", 석사, pp.2007
  37. 汪褘, "中古佛典量詞研究", 박사, pp.2008
  38. 李建平, "先秦兩漢量詞研究", 박사, pp.2010
  39. 李湘, "唐五代量詞研究", 박사, pp.2010
  40. 張萱, "淺析動量詞“過”和“次”", 석사, pp.2013
  41. 杜靖華, "『全宋詞』量詞研究", 석사, pp.2013
  42. 陽盼, "『齊民要術』度量衡量詞及其演變研究", 석사, pp.2017
  43. 董瀟, "北宋筆記量詞研究", 석사, pp.2018

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)