본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Distribution-Support Technologies in Commercialisation: The Malaysia Research Universities (RU) Experiences

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This article explores the experiences of Research Universities (RU) on distribution-support technologies in commercialisation with a specific focus in the Malaysian context. Research design, data and methodology: A qualitative research was carried out, in which six RU were interviewed. A structured interview was conducted. To analyse and interpret the data was using an approach adopted in qualitative thematic strategy. The findings were transcribed using Atlas.ti software to analyse related themes through a thematic analysis approach to link theories. Results: The findings provide useful insights into the significant roles of distribution-support technologies on the commercialisation strategy and impacts on the ecosystem of innovation and commercialisation in providing the importance of Distribution-support Technologies to strengthen the role of university-industry-community relation to drive the economy towards a high-income nation. Conclusions: This study will contribute theory through commercialisation literature by adding new knowledge concerning the link between universities and distribution-support technologies in commercialisation. Therefore, the practical contributions are significant for universities; industries; research institutes; government and societies to develop and plan strategically for effective, strategic and sustainable distribution-support technologies in innovation and commercialisation ecosystem.

Abstract

Purpose: This article explores the experiences of Research Universities (RU) on distribution-support technologies in commercialisation with a specific focus in the Malaysian context. Research design, data and methodology: A qualitative research was carried out, in which six RU were interviewed. A structured interview was conducted. To analyse and interpret the data was using an approach adopted in qualitative thematic strategy. The findings were transcribed using Atlas.ti software to analyse related themes through a thematic analysis approach to link theories. Results: The findings provide useful insights into the significant roles of distribution-support technologies on the commercialisation strategy and impacts on the ecosystem of innovation and commercialisation in providing the importance of Distribution-support Technologies to strengthen the role of university-industry-community relation to drive the economy towards a high-income nation. Conclusions: This study will contribute theory through commercialisation literature by adding new knowledge concerning the link between universities and distribution-support technologies in commercialisation. Therefore, the practical contributions are significant for universities; industries; research institutes; government and societies to develop and plan strategically for effective, strategic and sustainable distribution-support technologies in innovation and commercialisation ecosystem.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. BONGSO Gromyko, "The Urgency of Business Agility During COVID-19 Pandemic: Distribution of Small and Medium Business Products and Services", 유통과학연구, 20(6), pp.57~66 (2022), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  2. Boyatzis, R., "Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development" (1998), Sage
  3. Carayannis, E. G., "Mode 3 and quadruple helix: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem", International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3, pp.4) (2009), 201~234
  4. Carayannis, E. G., "The quadruple", quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond, 2014, pp.5(2), 212~239
  5. Cenamor, J., "Complementor competitive advantage : A framework for strategic decisions", Journal of Business Research, 122(2021), pp.335~343 (2021)
  6. Clayton, P., "Behind the scenes : intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship", Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), pp.104~124 (2018)
  7. Da Wan, C., "Education in Malaysia towards a developed nation", Proceeding at Yusof Ishak Institute, 4(2018), pp.1~20 (2018)
  8. Da Wan, C., "Academic governance and leadership in Malaysia : Examining the national higher education strategic initiatives", Journal of International and Comparative Education(JICE), 9(2), pp.91~102 (2020)
  9. De Wit-de Vries, E., "Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships : a review", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), pp.1236~1255 (2019)
  10. Etzkowitz, H., "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations", Research Policy, 29(2000), pp.109~123 (2000)
  11. Fini, R., "The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship", Research Policy, 49(10), pp.1~15 (2020)
  12. Friese, S., "Qualitative data analysis with Atlas.ti" (2019), Sage Publication Ltd
  13. Glaser, B., "The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitative research" (1967), Aldine
  14. Guest, G., "A Simple Method to Assess and Report Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Research", Plos One, 15(5), pp.1~17 (2020)
  15. Heydebreck, P., "Innovation support for new technology-based firms : The Swedish Teknopol approach", R&D Management, 30(2000), pp.89~10 (2000)
  16. Jackson, P., "University–industry collaboration within the triple helix of innovation : The importance of mutuality", Science and Public Policy, 45(4), pp.553~564 (2018)
  17. Javadi, M., "Understanding Thematic Analysis and Its Pitfall", Journal of Client Care, 1(1), pp.34~40 (2016)
  18. Khin, S., "Perspectives of start-up entrepreneurs on challenges, support services and entrepreneurial ecosystem", International Journal of Economic Research, 14(3), pp.335~353 (2017)
  19. Kim, J. H., "Sustainable management activities : A study on the relations between technology commercialisation capabilities, sustainable competitive advantage, and business performance", Sustainability, 12(19), pp.1~31 (2020)
  20. Lara, J. E., "The Quintuple Helix Modeling Technological Innovation: Characterization and the Status of Business Accelerators in a Metropolitan Region", International Journal of, The Quintuple Helix Modeling Technological Innovation: Characterization and the Status of Business Accelerators in a Metropolitan Region (2021)[DOI]
  21. Lara, JE, "The triple helix, quadruple helix, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?", Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), pp.25~35 (2012)
  22. Li, X., "University R&D activities and firm innovations", Finance Research Letters, 37(2020), pp.1~11 (2020)
  23. Liboreiro, K. R., "The role of the university research laboratory in technology transfer to firms in Brazil : Two case studies in biotechnology", Industry and Higher Education, 36(4), pp.398~414 (2022)
  24. Lu, L., "Strategic challenges for creating knowledge-based innovation in China : Transforming triple helix university-government-industry relations", Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), pp.5~11 (2008)
  25. Mascarenhas, C., "University–industry cooperation : A systematic literature review and research agenda", Science and Public Policy, 4(5), pp.708~718 (2018)
  26. Mason, C., "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship", Dutch Ministry of Economic Affair, 1(2014), pp.1~38 (2014)
  27. Miller, K., "Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review", International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1-3), pp.9~37 (2018)
  28. Othman, T., "Qualitative Data Analysis with Atlas.ti 8" (2019), Universiti Putra Malaysia
  29. Ramdan, M. R., "Exploring factors influencing the use of digital platform by micro and small enterprises", Jurnal Pengurusan(UKM Journal of Management), 59(2020), pp.37~51 (2020)
  30. Ramdan, M. R., "Organizational ambidexterity within supply chain management : a scoping review", LogForum, 17(4), pp.531~546 (2021)
  31. Siegel, D. S., "The impact of quarantines, lockdowns, and ‘reopenings’ on the commercialization of science : micro and macro issues", Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), pp.1389~1394 (2021)
  32. Spigel, B., "The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), pp.49~72 (2017)
  33. Sujianto, A, E., "Online-based collaborative learning : economics teaching innovation in higher education", Reviewof International Geographical Education(RIGEO), 11(2), pp.750~763 (2021)
  34. Zahra, S. A., "Why corporate science commercialization fails : Integrating diverse perspectives", Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), pp.156~176 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)