표면처리가 교정용 미니 임플랜트의 식립수직력과 토크에 미치는 영향
Influence of surface treatment on the insertion pattern of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 유지력을 높이기 위하여 교정용 미니 임플랜트에 표면처리를 시행하되 식립 과정의 용이성에 영향을 주지 않는 표면처리 방법을 찾기 위함이다. 교정용 미니 임플랜트를 etching, resorbable blasting media (RBM), 상부 나사산 부위만 RBM 처리를 한 hybrid 등의 3가지 방법으로 표면처리한 후 machined (표면 미처리)군과 비교하였다. 주사전자현미경과 표면 거칠기 측정기로 표면 거칠기를 비교하였으며, driving torque tester를 이용해 실험용 인공골에 교정용 미니 임플랜트를 식립하여, 식립 토크(rotational torque)와 수직력(vertical loading)의 식립 패턴을 비교하였다. Machined surface군과 비교하여 acid etching군에서는 표면 거칠기(Ra 값)가 크지 않았으나 (p ＞ 0.05), RBM군이나 hybrid군에서 표면 거칠기(Ra 값)가 유의하게 컸다 (p ＜ 0.05). 최종 식립 토크는 모든 표면처리군에서 machined군보다 컸다 (p ＜ 0.05). 최대 식립수직력은 hybrid군이 machined군이나 etched군보다 유의하게 작았으며 (p ＜ 0.05), RBM군이 가장 컸다 (p ＜ 0.05). 교정용 미니 임플랜트의 유지력을 높이기 위하여 보철용 임플랜트와 같은 방법으로 전면 표면처리를 하면 self drilling type 고유의 골 삭제기능이 저하될 수 있다. 그러나 cutting edge 일정 부위를 제외하며 적절하게 조절된 표면처리를 하면 골 삭제 능력의 큰 저하 없이 용이한 식립이 가능할 것으로 보인다.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants of different surfaces, namely, machined (untreated), etched (acid-etched), RBM (treated with resorbable blasting media) and hybrid (RBM + machined), with respect to the following criteria: physical appearance of the surface, measurement of surface roughness, and insertion pattern. Methods: Self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants (Osstem implant, Seoul, Korea) with the abovementioned surfaces were obtained. Surface roughness was measured by using a scanning electron microscope and surface-roughness-testing machine, and torque patterns and vertical loadings were measured during continuous insertion of mini-implants into artificial bone (polyurethane foam) by using a torque tester of the driving-motor type (speed, 12 rpm). Results: The mini-implants with the RBM, hybrid, and acid-etched surfaces had slightly increased maximum insertion torque at the final stage (p ＜ 0.05). Implants with the RBM surface had the highest vertical load for insertion (p ＜ 0.05). Testing for surface roughness revealed that the implants with the RBM and hybrid surfaces had higher Ra values than the others (p ＜ 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy showed that the implants with the RBM surface had the roughest surface. Conclusions: Surface-treated, self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants may be clinically acceptable, if controlled appropriately.
참고문헌 (20)
- Kanomi R, "Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage", J Clin Orthod, 31, pp.763~767 (1997)
- Chen Y, "Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.44~50 (2008)
- Chen Y, "Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.284~291 (2009)
- Crismani AG, "Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials", Am J Orthod Denofacial Orthop, 137, pp.108~113 (2010)
- 박진서, "Self-drilling 방식의 마이크로임플란트 식립에 의해 발생하는 피질골 스트레인의 유한요소해석", 대한치과교정학회지, 39(4), pp.203~212 (2009), 대한치과교정학회
- Kravitz ND, "Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131(4), pp.S43~51 (2007)
- Kuroda S, "Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131(4), pp.S68~73 (2007)
- Lee YK, "Root and bone response to the proximity of a mini-implant under orthodontic loading", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.452~458 (2010)
- Poggio PM, "“Safe zones”: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.191~197 (2006)
- Lim SA, "Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.234~240 (2008)
- Kim JW, "Comparison of stability between cylindrical and conical type mini-implants. Mechanical and histological properties", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.692~698 (2008)
- Cho IS, "The initial stability of mini-implants according to surface treatment method" (2008), Seoul: Seoul National University
- "Rotational Resistance of Surface-Treated Mini-implants", ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 79, pp.899~907
- Mo SS, "Resistance to immediate orthodontic loading of surface- treated mini-implants", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.123~129 (2010)
- Kasemo B, "Aspects of surface physics on titanium implants", Swed Dent J Suppl, 28, pp.19~36 (1985)
- Chehroudi B, "Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo", J Biomed Mater Res, 24, pp.1203~1219 (1990)
- Le Guéhennec L, "Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration", Dent Mater, 23, pp.844~854 (2007)
- Conchran DL, "Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.240~252 (1996)
- Motoyoshi M, "Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.109~114 (2006)
- Blumenthal NC, "Inhibition of apatite formation by titanium and vanadium ions", J Biomed Mater Res, 23(A1), pp.13~22 (1989)