본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reliability of a Newly Developed Tool to Assess and Classify Work-related Stress (TAWS-16) for Indian Workforce

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Work stress is associated with non-communicable diseases, increased healthcare costs, and decreased work productivity among employees in the information technology sector. There is a need for regular work-stress screening among employees using valid and reliable tools. The Tool to Assess and Classify Work Stress (TAWS-16) was developed to overcome limitations in existing stress assessment tools in India. This study aimed to test the reliability of TAWS-16 in a sample of managerial-supervisory employees.Methods: This observational reliability study included data from 62 employees. Test-retest and inter-method reliability were investigated using a TAWS-16 web application and interview by telephone, respectively. Kappa values and intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated. Internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha.Results: For both test-retest and inter-method reliability, the agreement for both work-related factors and symptoms suggestive of work stress exceeded 80%, and all kappa values were 0.40 or higher. Cronbach’s alpha for test-retest and inter-method reliability was 0.983 and 0.941, respectively.Conclusions: TAWS-16 demonstrated acceptable reliability. It measured stressors, coping abilities, and psychosomatic symptoms associated with work stress. We recommend using TAWS-16 to holistically identify work stress among employees during periodical health check-ups in India.

Abstract

Objectives: Work stress is associated with non-communicable diseases, increased healthcare costs, and decreased work productivity among employees in the information technology sector. There is a need for regular work-stress screening among employees using valid and reliable tools. The Tool to Assess and Classify Work Stress (TAWS-16) was developed to overcome limitations in existing stress assessment tools in India. This study aimed to test the reliability of TAWS-16 in a sample of managerial-supervisory employees.Methods: This observational reliability study included data from 62 employees. Test-retest and inter-method reliability were investigated using a TAWS-16 web application and interview by telephone, respectively. Kappa values and intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated. Internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha.Results: For both test-retest and inter-method reliability, the agreement for both work-related factors and symptoms suggestive of work stress exceeded 80%, and all kappa values were 0.40 or higher. Cronbach’s alpha for test-retest and inter-method reliability was 0.983 and 0.941, respectively.Conclusions: TAWS-16 demonstrated acceptable reliability. It measured stressors, coping abilities, and psychosomatic symptoms associated with work stress. We recommend using TAWS-16 to holistically identify work stress among employees during periodical health check-ups in India.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "Census tables: worker population enumeration" (2011)[URL]
  2. "IT & BPM idustry in India" (2023)[URL]
  3. "Employment generation" (2022)[URL]
  4. "Chapter 8: statistics on status of compliance with statutory provisions based on data collected by DGFASLI" (2011)[URL]
  5. Roy R, "Face, content, criterion and construct validity assessment of a newly developed tool to assess and classify work-related stress(TAWS-16)", PLoS One, 18(1), pp.e0280189~ (2023)
  6. Darshan MS, "A study on professional stress, depression and alcohol use among Indian IT professionals", Indian J Psychiatry, 55(1), pp.63~69 (2013)
  7. Anbazhagan A, "Work stress of hotel industry employees in Puducherry", Asia Pac J Mark Manag Rev, 2(5), pp.85~101 (2013)
  8. "Occupational health: stress at the workplace" (2020)[URL]
  9. Rathore M, "Stress impact on industrial area of Indian managers", J Hum Ecol, 25(1), pp.37~40 (2009)
  10. Fleiss JL, "The design and analysis of clinical experiments", pp.17~28 (1986), Wiley
  11. Gautham MS, "TAWS-16: tool to assess and classify work-related stress", Department of Epidemiology, Centre for Public Health, 7~16 (2021)
  12. Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33(1), pp.159~174 (1977)
  13. Spearman C, "Demonstration of formulae for true measurement of correlation", Am J Psychol, 18(2), pp.161~169 (1907)
  14. Cronbach LJ, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests", Psychometrika, 16(3), pp.297~334 (1951)
  15. Chen WQ, "Reliability and validity of the Occupational Stress Scale for Chinese off-shore oil installation workers", Stress Health, 17(3), pp.175~183 (2001)
  16. Leong FT, "Test ritiques", pp.319~334 (1992), Pro-Ed
  17. Miller JO, "Work role inventory : a guide to job satisfaction", Nurs Manage, 24(1), pp.54~56 (1993)
  18. El Fassi M, "Work ability assessment in a worker population : comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score", BMC Public Health, 13, pp.305~ (2013)
  19. Karasek R, "The Job Content Questionnaire(JCQ) : an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics", J Occup Health Psychol, 3(4), pp.322~355 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)