How Well Do U.S. Primary Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinicians Screen for Pregnancy Complications at Well Woman Visits? A Retrospective Cohort Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits between providers in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of subjects with at least 1 prior birth who presented for a well woman visit in 2019-2020. Charts were reviewed for documentation of a general medical history (hypertension, diabetes, and mood disorders) versus screening for comparable obstetric complications (pre-eclampsia, GDM, and PMADs). The results were compared using the McNemar and chi-square tests as appropriate.Results: In total, 472 encounters were identified, and 137 met the inclusion criteria. Across specialties, clinicians were significantly more likely to document general medical conditions than pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 5.48), diabetes (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 3.27 to 22.0), and mood disorders (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.81 to 40.3). Obstetrics and gynecology providers were more likely to document any pregnancy history (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 16.27); however, they were not significantly more likely to screen for relevant obstetric complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.89). Overall, the rate of pregnancy complication documentation was low in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics (8.8 and 19.0%, respectively).Conclusions: Obstetrics and gynecology providers more frequently documented a pregnancy history than those in primary care; however, the rate was low across specialties, and providers reported screening for clinically relevant complications less frequently than for general medical conditions.
Abstract
Objectives: Pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes (GDM), and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs), impact long-term health. We compared the frequency of screening documentation for pregnancy complications versus a general medical history at well woman visits between providers in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of subjects with at least 1 prior birth who presented for a well woman visit in 2019-2020. Charts were reviewed for documentation of a general medical history (hypertension, diabetes, and mood disorders) versus screening for comparable obstetric complications (pre-eclampsia, GDM, and PMADs). The results were compared using the McNemar and chi-square tests as appropriate.Results: In total, 472 encounters were identified, and 137 met the inclusion criteria. Across specialties, clinicians were significantly more likely to document general medical conditions than pregnancy complications, including hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 5.48), diabetes (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 3.27 to 22.0), and mood disorders (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.81 to 40.3). Obstetrics and gynecology providers were more likely to document any pregnancy history (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.24 to 16.27); however, they were not significantly more likely to screen for relevant obstetric complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.89). Overall, the rate of pregnancy complication documentation was low in primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics (8.8 and 19.0%, respectively).Conclusions: Obstetrics and gynecology providers more frequently documented a pregnancy history than those in primary care; however, the rate was low across specialties, and providers reported screening for clinically relevant complications less frequently than for general medical conditions.
참고문헌 (20)
- Gestational hypertension, "number 222", Obstet Gynecol, 135(6), pp.e237~e260 (2020)
- Smith GC, "Pregnancy complications and maternal risk of ischaemic heart disease: a retrospective cohort study of 129,290 births", Lancet, 357(9273), pp.2002~2006 (2001)
- Ray JG, "Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes(CHAMPS) : population-based retrospective cohort study", Lancet, 366(9499), pp.1797~1803 (2005)
- Brown MC, "Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia : systematic review and meta-analysis", Eur J Epidemiol, 28(1), pp.1~19 (2013)
- Grandi SM, "Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease", Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 31(5), pp.412~421 (2017)
- Brouwers L, "Recurrence of pre-eclampsia and the risk of future hypertension and cardiovascular disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis", BJOG, 125(13), pp.1642~1654 (2018)
- "ACOG practice bulletin no. 190: gestational diabetes mellitus", Obstet Gynecol, 131(2), pp.e49~e64 (2018)
- Kim C, "Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes : a systematic review", Diabetes Care, 25(10), pp.1862~1868 (2002)
- Bellamy L, "Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Lancet, 373(9677), pp.1773~1779 (2009)
- Meltzer-Brody S, "The long-term psychiatric and medical prognosis of perinatal mental illness", Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 28(1), pp.49~60 (2014)
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, "15. Management of diabetes in pregnancy : standards of medical care in diabetes-2022", Diabetes Care, 45(Suppl 1), pp.S232~S243 (2022)
- Mosca L, "Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update : a guideline from the American Heart Association", Circulation, 123(11), pp.1243~1262 (2011)
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy, "Hypertension in pregnancy : executive summary", Obstet Gynecol, 122(5), pp.1122~1131 (2013)
- Piepoli MF, "2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice : the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice(constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation(EACPR)", Eur Heart J, 37(29), pp.2315~2381 (2016)
- Pascale A, "Rethinking the well woman visit : a scoping review to identify eight priority areas for well woman care in the era of the Affordable Care Act", Womens Health Issues, 26(2), pp.135~146 (2016)
- "ACOG committee opinion No. 755: well-woman visit", Obstet Gynecol, 132(4), pp.e181~e186 (2018)
- Phipps MG, "Women’s preventive services initiative’s well-woman chart : a summary of preventive health recommendations for women", Obstet Gynecol, 134(3), pp.465~469 (2019)
- Brener A, "Missed opportunities to prevent cardiovascular disease in women with prior preeclampsia", BMC Womens Health, 20(1), pp.217~ (2020)
- Nagraj S, "Women’s and healthcare providers’ perceptions of long-term complications associated with hypertension and diabetes in pregnancy : a qualitative study", BJOG, 126(Suppl 4), pp.34~42 (2019)
- Bowman S, "Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity : quality and safety implications", Perspect Health Inf Manag, 10(Fall), pp.1c~ (2013)