Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III patients who underwent orthodontic treatment and two-jaw orthognathic surgery
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To investigate the pattern of accuracy change in artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification (LI) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm in serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-cephs) of Class III (C-III) patients who underwent twojaw orthognathic surgery. Methods: A total of 3,188 Lat-cephs of C-III patients were allocated into the training and validation sets (3,004 Lat-cephs of 751 patients) and test set (184 Lat-cephs of 46 patients; subdivided into the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups, n = 23 per group) for LI. Each C-III patient in the test set had four Lat-cephs: initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, presence of orthodontic brackets [OBs]), post-surgery (T2, presence of OBs and surgical plates and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, presence of S-PS and fixed retainers [FR]). After mean errors of 20 landmarks between human gold standard and the CNN model were calculated, statistical analysis was performed. Results: The total mean error was 1.17 mm without significant difference among the four timepoints (T0, 1.20 mm; T1, 1.14 mm; T2, 1.18 mm; T3, 1.15 mm). In comparison of two time-points ([T0, T1] vs. [T2, T3]), ANS, A point, and B point showed an increase in error (p < 0.01, 0.05, 0.01, respectively), while Mx6D and Md6D showeda decrease in error (all p < 0.01). No difference in errors existed at B point, Pogonion, Menton, Md1C, and Md1R between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups. Conclusions: The CNN model can be used for LI in serial Lat-cephs despite the presence of OB, S-PS, FR, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the pattern of accuracy change in artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification (LI) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm in serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-cephs) of Class III (C-III) patients who underwent twojaw orthognathic surgery. Methods: A total of 3,188 Lat-cephs of C-III patients were allocated into the training and validation sets (3,004 Lat-cephs of 751 patients) and test set (184 Lat-cephs of 46 patients; subdivided into the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups, n = 23 per group) for LI. Each C-III patient in the test set had four Lat-cephs: initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, presence of orthodontic brackets [OBs]), post-surgery (T2, presence of OBs and surgical plates and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, presence of S-PS and fixed retainers [FR]). After mean errors of 20 landmarks between human gold standard and the CNN model were calculated, statistical analysis was performed. Results: The total mean error was 1.17 mm without significant difference among the four timepoints (T0, 1.20 mm; T1, 1.14 mm; T2, 1.18 mm; T3, 1.15 mm). In comparison of two time-points ([T0, T1] vs. [T2, T3]), ANS, A point, and B point showed an increase in error (p < 0.01, 0.05, 0.01, respectively), while Mx6D and Md6D showeda decrease in error (all p < 0.01). No difference in errors existed at B point, Pogonion, Menton, Md1C, and Md1R between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups. Conclusions: The CNN model can be used for LI in serial Lat-cephs despite the presence of OB, S-PS, FR, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.
참고문헌 (20)
- 임동혁, "서울대학교 치과병원 교정과에 내원한 부정교합 환자의 최근 경향", 대한치과교정학회지, 33(1), pp.63~72 (2003), 대한치과교정학회
- Yongxu Piao, "Five-year investigation of a large orthodontic patient population at a dental hospital in South Korea", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(3), pp.137~145 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Nielsen IL, "Maxillary superimposition : a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95, pp.422~431 (1989)
- Johnston C, "Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment : a cephalometric study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.300~309 (2006)
- Hutton TJ, "An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks", Eur J Orthod, 22, pp.499~508 (2000)
- Leonardi R, "Automatic cephalometric analysis", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.145~151 (2008)
- Leonardi R, "An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images", J Biomed Biotechnol, 2009, pp.717102~ (2009)
- Arık SÖ, "Fully automated quantitative cephalometry using convolutional neural networks", J Med Imaging(Bellingham), 4, pp.014501~ (2017)
- Lee JH, "Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks", BMC Oral Health, 20, pp.270~ (2020)
- Vandaele R, "Landmark detection in 2D bioimages for geometric morphometrics : a multi-resolution tree-based approach", Sci Rep, 8, pp.538~ (2018)
- Khanagar SB, "Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making - a systematic review", J Dent Sci, 16, pp.482~492 (2021)
- Kim J, "Accuracy of automated identification of lateral cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolutional neural networks on lateral cephalograms from nationwide multi-centres", Orthod Craniofac Res, 24(Suppl 2), pp.59~67 (2021)
- Wang CW, "Evaluation and comparison of anatomical landmark detection methods for cephalometric X-ray images : a grand challenge", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 34, pp.1890~1900 (2015)
- Wang CW, "A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms", Med Image Anal, 31, pp.63~76 (2016)
- Hwang HW, "Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks : part 2-Might it be better than human?", Angle Orthod, 90, pp.69~76 (2020)
- Lin TY, "Focal loss for dense object detection", IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 42, pp.318~327 (2020)
- "U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation" (2015)[URL]
- Roden-Johnson D, "Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms:landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.556~564 (2008)
- Ohba S, "Effects of vertical movement of the anterior nasal spine on the maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy for pitch correction", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.e481~e485 (2015)
- Venkategowda PR, "Stability of vertical, horizontal and angular parameters following superior repositioning of maxilla by Le Fort I osteotomy: a cephalometric study", J Clin Diagn Res, 11, pp.ZC10~ZC (2017)