Accuracy of posteroanterior cephalogram landmarks and measurements identification using a cascaded convolutional neural network algorithm: A multicenter study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To quantify the effects of midline-related landmark identification on midline deviation measurements in posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms using a cascaded convolutional neural network (CNN). Methods: A total of 2,903 PA cephalogram images obtained from 9 university hospitals were divided into training, internal validation, and test sets (n = 2,150, 376, and 377). As the gold standard, 2 orthodontic professors marked the bilateral landmarks, including the frontozygomatic suture point and latero-orbitale (LO), and the midline landmarks, including the crista galli, anterior nasal spine (ANS), upper dental midpoint (UDM), lower dental midpoint (LDM), and menton (Me). For the test, Examiner-1 and Examiner-2 (3-year and 1-year orthodontic residents) and the Cascaded-CNN models marked the landmarks. After point-to-point errors of landmark identification, the successful detection rate (SDR) and distance and direction of the midline landmark deviation from the midsagittal line (ANS-mid, UDM-mid, LDM-mid, and Me-mid) were measured, and statistical analysis was performed. Results: The cascaded-CNN algorithm showed a clinically acceptable level of point-to-point error (1.26 mm vs. 1.57 mm in Examiner-1 and 1.75 mm in Examiner-2). The average SDR within the 2 mm range was 83.2%, with high accuracy at the LO (right, 96.9%; left, 97.1%), and UDM (96.9%). The absolute measurement errors were less than 1 mm for ANS-mid, UDM-mid, and LDM-mid compared with the gold standard. Conclusions: The cascaded-CNN model may be considered an effective tool for the auto-identification of midline landmarks and quantification of midline deviation in PA cephalograms of adult patients, regardless of variations in the image acquisition method.
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the effects of midline-related landmark identification on midline deviation measurements in posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms using a cascaded convolutional neural network (CNN). Methods: A total of 2,903 PA cephalogram images obtained from 9 university hospitals were divided into training, internal validation, and test sets (n = 2,150, 376, and 377). As the gold standard, 2 orthodontic professors marked the bilateral landmarks, including the frontozygomatic suture point and latero-orbitale (LO), and the midline landmarks, including the crista galli, anterior nasal spine (ANS), upper dental midpoint (UDM), lower dental midpoint (LDM), and menton (Me). For the test, Examiner-1 and Examiner-2 (3-year and 1-year orthodontic residents) and the Cascaded-CNN models marked the landmarks. After point-to-point errors of landmark identification, the successful detection rate (SDR) and distance and direction of the midline landmark deviation from the midsagittal line (ANS-mid, UDM-mid, LDM-mid, and Me-mid) were measured, and statistical analysis was performed. Results: The cascaded-CNN algorithm showed a clinically acceptable level of point-to-point error (1.26 mm vs. 1.57 mm in Examiner-1 and 1.75 mm in Examiner-2). The average SDR within the 2 mm range was 83.2%, with high accuracy at the LO (right, 96.9%; left, 97.1%), and UDM (96.9%). The absolute measurement errors were less than 1 mm for ANS-mid, UDM-mid, and LDM-mid compared with the gold standard. Conclusions: The cascaded-CNN model may be considered an effective tool for the auto-identification of midline landmarks and quantification of midline deviation in PA cephalograms of adult patients, regardless of variations in the image acquisition method.
참고문헌 (22)
- McCarthy J, "Philosophical logic and artificial intelligence", pp.161~190 (1989), Springer
- Hamet P, "Artificial intelligence in medicine", Metabolism, 69S, pp.S36~S40 (2017)[DOI]
- LeCun Y, "Deep learning", Nature, 521, pp.436~444 (2015)[DOI]
- Yasaka K, "Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology", Jpn J Radiol, 36, pp.257~272 (2018)[DOI]
- Broadbent BH, "A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia", Angle Orthod, 1, pp.45~66 (1931)
- Kazandjian S, "Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.619~624 (2006)
- Yu HJ, "Automated skeletal classification with lateral cephalometry based on artificial intelligence", J Dent Res, 99, pp.249~256 (2020)[DOI]
- Kim IH, "Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net", Sci Rep, 11, pp.7925~ (2021)[DOI]
- Wang CW, "Evaluation and comparison of anatomical landmark detection methods for cephalometric x-ray images : a grand challenge", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 34, pp.1890~1900 (2015)[DOI]
- Park JH, "Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks : Part 1-Comparisons between the latest deep-learning methods YOLOV3 and SSD", Angle Orthod, 89, pp.903~909 (2019)[DOI]
- Hwang HW, "Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks : Part 2-Might it be better than human?", Angle Orthod, 90, pp.69~76 (2020)[DOI]
- Song Y, "Automatic cephalometric landmark detection on x-ray images using a deep-learning method", Appl Sci, 10, pp.2547~ (2020)[DOI]
- Kunz F, "Artificial intelligence in orthodontics : evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network", J Orofac Orthop, 81, pp.52~68 (2020)[DOI]
- Hong M, "Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III patients who underwent orthodontic treatment and two-jaw orthognathic surgery", Korean J Orthod, 52, pp.287~297 (2022)[DOI]
- Muraev AA, "Frontal cephalometric landmarking : humans vs artificial neural networks", Int J Comput Dent, 23, pp.139~148 (2020)
- Gil SM, "Accuracy of auto-identification of the posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolution neural network algorithm and cephalometric images of different quality from nationwide multiple centers", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 161, pp.e361~e371 (2022)[DOI]
- Lin TY, "Focal loss for dense object detection", IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 42, pp.318~327 (2020)[DOI]
- Ronneberger O, "Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - MICCAI 2015", pp.234~241 (2015), Springer
- He K, "Deep residual learning for image recognition", Paper presented at: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2016), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Lee HJ, "A comparative study of the deviation of the menton on posteroanterior cephalograms and three-dimensional computed tomography", Imaging Sci Dent, 46, pp.33~38 (2016)[DOI]
- Major PW, "Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.447~454 (1994)
- Na ER, "A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans", Korean J Orthod, 49, pp.41~48 (2019)[DOI]