Effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium versus superelastic nickel-titanium aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium (SmartArch) and superelastic nickel-titanium (SENT) archwires in aligning teeth and inducing root resorption and pain experienced by patients. Methods: Two-arm parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio were used. The participants were patients aged 11.5 years and older with 5–9 mm of mandibular anterior crowding who were indicated for non-extraction treatment. The primary outcome was alignment effectiveness, assessed using Little’s irregularity index (LII) over 16 weeks with a single wire (0.016-inch) in the SmartArch group and 2 wires (0.014- and 0.018-inch) in the SENT group (8 weeks each). Secondary outcomes included root resorption evaluated by pre- and post-intervention periapical radiographs and pain levels recorded by the participants during the first week. Results: A total of 40 participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups; 33 completed the study and were analyzed (16 in the SmartArch group and 17 in the SENT group, aged 16.97 ± 4.05 years). The total LII decrease for the SmartArch and SENT groups was 5.63 mm and 5.29 mm, respectively, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant. Root resorption was not significantly different between the groups. The difference in pain levels was not statistically significant for the first 5 days following wire placement; however, there was a significant difference favoring the SENT group in the final 2 days. Conclusions: SmartArch and SENT archwires were similarly effective during the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment. Root resorption should be observed throughout the treatment with either wire. SmartArch wires demonstrated higher pain perception than SENT wires.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium (SmartArch) and superelastic nickel-titanium (SENT) archwires in aligning teeth and inducing root resorption and pain experienced by patients. Methods: Two-arm parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio were used. The participants were patients aged 11.5 years and older with 5–9 mm of mandibular anterior crowding who were indicated for non-extraction treatment. The primary outcome was alignment effectiveness, assessed using Little’s irregularity index (LII) over 16 weeks with a single wire (0.016-inch) in the SmartArch group and 2 wires (0.014- and 0.018-inch) in the SENT group (8 weeks each). Secondary outcomes included root resorption evaluated by pre- and post-intervention periapical radiographs and pain levels recorded by the participants during the first week. Results: A total of 40 participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups; 33 completed the study and were analyzed (16 in the SmartArch group and 17 in the SENT group, aged 16.97 ± 4.05 years). The total LII decrease for the SmartArch and SENT groups was 5.63 mm and 5.29 mm, respectively, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant. Root resorption was not significantly different between the groups. The difference in pain levels was not statistically significant for the first 5 days following wire placement; however, there was a significant difference favoring the SENT group in the final 2 days. Conclusions: SmartArch and SENT archwires were similarly effective during the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment. Root resorption should be observed throughout the treatment with either wire. SmartArch wires demonstrated higher pain perception than SENT wires.
참고문헌 (26)
- Wang Y, "Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, pp.CD007859~ (2018)[DOI]
- Jian F, "Initial arch wires for tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, pp.CD007859~ (2013)[DOI]
- Abdelrahman RSh, "A clinical comparison of three aligning archwires in terms of alignment efficiency : a prospective clinical trial", Angle Orthod, 85, pp.434~439 (2015)[DOI]
- Rodrigues PF, "Thermo-mechanical characterization of NiTi orthodontic archwires with graded actuating forces", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 107, pp.103747~ (2020)[DOI]
- Viecilli RF, "Ideal orthodontic alignment load relationships based on periodontal ligament stress", Orthod Craniofac Res, 18(Suppl 1), pp.180~186 (2015)[DOI]
- Abaas HD, "Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires", J Bagh Coll Dent, 27, pp.154~157 (2015)
- "NEW SMARTARCH Laser Engineered CuNiTi® brochure" (2019)[URL]
- Modi N, "Newer orthodontic archwires-a review", Int J Appl Dent Sci, 6, pp.90~94 (2020)[DOI]
- Shah B, "Bending and phase transformation properties of a force gradient nickel-titanium orthodontic wire", MS, pp.2021
- Jain S, "Comparison of two different initial archwires for tooth alignment during fixed orthodontic treatment-a randomized clinical trial", J Orthod Sci, 10, pp.13~ (2021)[DOI]
- Azizi F, "Tooth alignment and pain experience with A-NiTi versus Cu-NiTi : a randomized clinical trial", BMC Oral Health, 21, pp.431~ (2021)[DOI]
- Nabbat SA, "A clinical comparison of the effectiveness of two types of orthodontic aligning archwire materials : a multicentre randomized clinical trial", Eur J Orthod, 42, pp.626~634 (2020)[DOI]
- Atik E, "A comparative assessment of clinical efficiency between premium heat-activated copper nickel-titanium and superelastic nickel-titanium archwires during initial orthodontic alignment in adolescents : a randomized clinical trial", Prog Orthod, 20, pp.46~ (2019)[DOI]
- Phermsang-Ngarm P, "Tooth and bone changes after initial anterior dental alignment using preformed vs customized nickel titanium archwires in adults : a randomized clinical trial", Angle Orthod, 88, pp.425~434 (2018)[DOI]
- Little RM, "The irregularity index : a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment", Am J Orthod, 68, pp.554~563 (1975)[DOI]
- Malmgren O, "Root resorption after orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.487~491 (1982)[DOI]
- Moher D, "CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration : updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials", BMJ, 340, pp.c869~ (2010)[DOI]
- Mahmoudzadeh M, "Clinical comparison of two initial arch wires(A-NiTi and Heat Activated NiTi)for amount of tooth alignment and perception of pain : a randomized clinical trial", Int Orthod, 16, pp.60~72 (2018)[DOI]
- Aydın B, "Evaluation of the alignment efficiency of nickel-titanium and copper-nickel-titanium archwires in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment over a 12-week period : a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial", Korean J Orthod, 48, pp.153~162 (2018)[DOI]
- Abdaljawwad AA, "Effects of various analgesics on pain perception and rate of tooth movement : a randomized controlled clinical study", J Baghdad Coll Dent, 34, pp.37~51 (2022)
- Serafim CM, "Clinical efficiency of two sequences of orthodontic wires to correct crowding of the lower anterior teeth", ScientificWorldJournal, 2015, pp.690280~ (2015)[DOI]
- Gok F, "Comparison of arch width and depth changes and pain", discomfort with conventional and copper Ni-Ti archwires for mandibular arch alignment, 2018, pp.7, 24~28
- Luppanapornlarp S, "Interleukin-1beta levels, pain intensity, and tooth movement using two different magnitudes of continuous orthodontic force", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.596~601 (2010)[DOI]
- Yassir YA, "Orthodontic treatment and root resorption : an overview of systematic reviews", Eur J Orthod, 43, pp.442~456 (2021)[DOI]
- Weiland F, "Constant versus dissipating forces in orthodontics : the effect on initial tooth movement and root resorption", Eur J Orthod, 25, pp.335~342 (2003)[DOI]
- Currell SD, "Orthodontic mechanotherapies and their influence on external root resorption : a systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 155, pp.313~329 (2019)[DOI]