본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is three-piece maxillary segmentation surgery a stable procedure?

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The number of three-piece maxillary osteotomies has increased over the years; however, the literature remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability of this surgical modality compared with that of one-piece maxillary osteotomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 39 individuals who underwent Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies and were divided into two groups: group 1 (three pieces, n = 22) and group 2 (one piece, n = 17). Three cone-beam computed tomography scans from each patient (T1, pre-surgical; T2, post-surgical; and T3, follow-up) were used to evaluate the three-dimensional skeletal changes. Results: The differences within groups were statistically significant only for group 1 in terms of surgical changes (T2-T1) with a mean difference in the canine region of 3.09 mm and the posterior region of 3.08 mm. No significant differences in surgical stability were identified between or within the groups. The mean values of the differences between groups were 0.05 mm (posterior region) and –0.39 mm (canine region). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that one- and three-piece maxillary osteotomies result in similar post-surgical skeletal stability.

Abstract

Objective: The number of three-piece maxillary osteotomies has increased over the years; however, the literature remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability of this surgical modality compared with that of one-piece maxillary osteotomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 39 individuals who underwent Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies and were divided into two groups: group 1 (three pieces, n = 22) and group 2 (one piece, n = 17). Three cone-beam computed tomography scans from each patient (T1, pre-surgical; T2, post-surgical; and T3, follow-up) were used to evaluate the three-dimensional skeletal changes. Results: The differences within groups were statistically significant only for group 1 in terms of surgical changes (T2-T1) with a mean difference in the canine region of 3.09 mm and the posterior region of 3.08 mm. No significant differences in surgical stability were identified between or within the groups. The mean values of the differences between groups were 0.05 mm (posterior region) and –0.39 mm (canine region). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that one- and three-piece maxillary osteotomies result in similar post-surgical skeletal stability.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Bell WH, "Bone healing and revascularization after total maxillary osteotomy", J Oral Surg, 33, pp.253~260 (1975)
  2. Proffit WR, "The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation : an update and extension", Head Face Med, 3, pp.21~ (2007)[DOI]
  3. Kretschmer WB, "Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in bimaxillary osteotomies : single-piece versus 3-piece maxilla", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68, pp.372~380 (2010)[DOI]
  4. Kretschmer WB, "Transverse stability of 3-piece Le Fort I osteotomies", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, pp.861~869 (2011)[DOI]
  5. Blæhr TL, "Stability of the anterior maxillary segment and teeth after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy and postoperative skeletal elastic fixation with or without occlusal splint", J Oral Maxillofac Res, 5, pp.e4~ (2014)[DOI]
  6. Tai W, "Le Fort I osteotomy with segmentation for the treatment of maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion : a single-centre, 10-year outcome study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, pp.1197~1204 (2022)[DOI]
  7. Kahnberg KE, "The approach to dentofacial skeletal deformities using a multisegmentation technique", Clin Plast Surg, 34, pp.477~484 (2007)[DOI]
  8. Morgan TA, "Effects of the multiple-piece maxillary osteotomy on the periodontium", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 16, pp.255~265 (2001)
  9. Reyneke JP, "Surgical", orthodontic correction of transverse maxillary discrepancies, 2020, pp.32, 53~69
  10. Posnick JC, "Segmental maxillary osteotomies in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery : indications-safety-outcome", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 74, pp.1422~1440 (2016)[DOI]
  11. Haas Junior OL, "Stability and surgical complications in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 46, pp.1071~1087 (2017)[DOI]
  12. Kramer FJ, "Intra-and perioperative complications of the LeFort I osteotomy : a prospective evaluation of 1000 patients", J Craniofac Surg, 15, pp.971~977 (2004)
  13. Kahnberg KE, "Complications associated with segmentation of the maxilla : a retrospective radiographic follow up of 82 patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 34, pp.840~845 (2005)[DOI]
  14. Rodrigues DB, "Maxillary interdental osteotomies have low morbidity for alveolar crestal bone and adjacent teeth : a cone beam computed tomography-based study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 76, pp.1763~1771 (2018)[DOI]
  15. Venugoplan SR, "Discharge patterns of orthognathic surgeries in the United States", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.e77~e86 (2012)[DOI]
  16. Jodeh DS, "Le Fort 1 and bimaxillary osteotomies increase the length of stay but not postoperative morbidity compared to mandibular osteotomies and single jaw procedures", J Craniofac Surg, 31, pp.1734~1738 (2020)[DOI]
  17. Perez MM, "The long-term stability of LeFort I maxillary downgrafts with rigid fixation to correct vertical maxillary deficiency", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112, pp.104~108 (1997)[DOI]
  18. Hoppenreijs TJ, "Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability of Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies and bimaxillary osteotomies in anterior open bite deformities. A retrospective three-centre study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 26, pp.161~175 (1997)[DOI]
  19. Bailey LJ, "Stability following superior repositioning of the maxilla by Le Fort I osteotomy : five-year follow-up", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 9, pp.163~173 (1994)
  20. Arpornmaeklong P, "A comparison of the stability of single-piece and segmental Le Fort I maxillary advancements", J Craniofac Surg, 14, pp.3~9 (2003)[DOI]
  21. Parizotto JOL, "Can palatal splint improve stability of segmental Le Fort I osteotomies?", Orthod Craniofac Res, 23, pp.486~492 (2020)[DOI]
  22. Bailey L', "Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.273~277 (2004)
  23. Proffit WR, "Orthognathic surgery : a hierarchy of stability", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 11, pp.191~204 (1996)
  24. Bailey LJ, "Segmental LeFort I osteotomy for management of transverse maxillary deficiency", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 55, pp.728~731 (1997)[DOI]
  25. Lele S, "Euclidean distance matrix analysis : a coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data", Am J Phys Anthropol, 86, pp.415~427 (1991)[DOI]
  26. Wolford LM, "Modification of the mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 64, pp.146~155 (1987)[DOI]
  27. Bennett MA, "The maxillary step osteotomy and Steinmann pin stabilization", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 43, pp.307~311 (1985)[DOI]
  28. Yushkevich PA, "User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures : significantly improved efficiency and reliability", Neuroimage, 31, pp.1116~1128 (2006)[DOI]
  29. Cevidanes LH, "Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 34, pp.369~375 (2005)[DOI]
  30. Ruellas AC, "Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.645~656 (2016)[DOI]
  31. Ruellas AC, "3D mandibular superimposition : comparison of regions of reference for voxel-based registration", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0157625~ (2016)[DOI]
  32. Casko JS, "Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.589~599 (1998)[DOI]
  33. Wolford LM, "Soft tissue healing after parasagittal palatal incisions in segmental maxillary surgery : a review of 311 patients", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60, pp.20~25 (2002)
  34. Haas Junior OL, "Hierarchy of surgical stability in orthognathic surgery : overview of systematic reviews", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, pp.1415~1433 (2019)[DOI]
  35. Starch-Jensen T, "Transverse expansion and stability after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy versus surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion : a systematic review", J Oral Maxillofac Res, 7, pp.e1~ (2016)[DOI]
  36. Marchetti C, "Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion vs. segmental Le Fort I osteotomy : transverse stability over a 2-year period", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 37, pp.74~78 (2009)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of the stability of maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion김훈, 차경석대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2018 · 제48권 제1호Postoperative Stability of a LeFort I Osteotomy: A Literature Review김수관, 오지수, 이계준치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2011 · 제35권 제1호Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction김수관, 김원기, 마득현, 오지수, 유경환, 유재식, 정서윤대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2017 · 제43권 제1호Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgeryBaek Seung-Hak, Cho Heon Jae, Hong Mihee, Kim Myung-Jin, Shin Hye Jung대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2020 · 제50권 제5호Le Fort I 골절단술을 통한 상악의 후상방 회전에 따른 상순과 비부의 연조직 변화이원, 권영욱, 박재억, 표성운대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2011 · 제37권 제6호A comparison of fixation methods using three-dimensional finite element analysis following anterior segmental osteotomy박명균, 박재억, 윤경인, Min-Kyu Park대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2012 · 제38권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)