A scoping review of cephalometric normative data in children
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Understanding the orofacial characteristics and growth patterns in children is essential for both orthodontics and research on children with orofacial abnormalities. However, a concise resource of normative data on the size and relative position of these structures in different populations is not available. Our objective was to aggregate normative data to assess the growth of the orofacial skeletal structures in children with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included longitudinal and cross-sectional studies on cephalometric measurement of skeletal tissues and a study population ≤ 18 years with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion. Key study parameters were extracted, and knowledge was synthesized. A quality appraisal was performed using a 10-point scale. Results: The final selection comprised of 12 longitudinal and 33 cross-sectional studies, the quality of which ranged from good to excellent. Our results showed that from childhood to adulthood, the length of the cranial base increased significantly while the cranial base angle remained constant; both the maxilla and mandible moved forward and downward. The profile becomes straighter with age. Conclusions: Growth patterns in children with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion follow accepted theories of growth.
Abstract
Objective: Understanding the orofacial characteristics and growth patterns in children is essential for both orthodontics and research on children with orofacial abnormalities. However, a concise resource of normative data on the size and relative position of these structures in different populations is not available. Our objective was to aggregate normative data to assess the growth of the orofacial skeletal structures in children with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included longitudinal and cross-sectional studies on cephalometric measurement of skeletal tissues and a study population ≤ 18 years with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion. Key study parameters were extracted, and knowledge was synthesized. A quality appraisal was performed using a 10-point scale. Results: The final selection comprised of 12 longitudinal and 33 cross-sectional studies, the quality of which ranged from good to excellent. Our results showed that from childhood to adulthood, the length of the cranial base increased significantly while the cranial base angle remained constant; both the maxilla and mandible moved forward and downward. The profile becomes straighter with age. Conclusions: Growth patterns in children with a well-balanced face and normal occlusion follow accepted theories of growth.
참고문헌 (73)
- Bishara SE, "Changes in facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.238~252 (1984)[DOI]
- Ursi WJ, "Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth", Angle Orthod, 63, pp.47~56 (1993)
- Bartzela TN, "Update on 13 syndromes affecting craniofacial and dental structures", Front Physiol, 8, pp.1038~ (2017)[DOI]
- Jacobson A, "Radiographic cephalometry: from basics to 3-D imaging" (2006), Quintessence Pub Co
- Jodeh DS, "Adding depth to cephalometric analysis : comparing two-and three-dimensional angular cephalometric measurements", J Craniofac Surg, 30, pp.1568~1571 (2019)[DOI]
- Thordarson A, "Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age-a longitudinal study", Eur J Orthod, 28, pp.152~165 (2006)[DOI]
- Björk A, "Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years", Eur J Orthod, 5, pp.1~46 (1983)[DOI]
- "An Atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University school growth study, the University of Michigan" (1974)[URL]
- Thompson GW, "A longitudinal evaluation of the Burlington growth centre data", J Dent Res, 56(Spec No), pp.C71~C78 (1977)[DOI]
- Sherman SL, "The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.429~436 (1988)
- Enlow DH, "Essentials of facial growth" (2008), Needham Press
- Burr DB, "Basic and applied bone biology" (2014), Academic Press
- Afrand M, "Anterior cranial-base time-related changes : a systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.21~32 (2014)
- Currie K, "Posterior cranial base natural growth and development : a systematic review", Angle Orthod, 87, pp.897~910 (2017)[DOI]
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics" (2018), Mosby
- Costello BJ, "Growth and development considerations for craniomaxillofacial surgery", Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 24, pp.377~396 (2012)[DOI]
- Liu YP, "Mandibular growth, remodeling, and maturation during infancy and early childhood", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.97~105 (2010)[DOI]
- Broadbent BH, "Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth", Mosby
- Arksey H, "Scoping studies : towards a methodological framework", Int J Soc Res Methodol, 8, pp.19~32 (2005)[DOI]
- Levac D, "Scoping studies : advancing the methodology", Implement Sci, 5, pp.69~ (2010)[DOI]
- Tricco AC, "PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews(PRISMA-ScR) : checklist and explanation", Ann Intern Med, 169, pp.467~473 (2018)[DOI]
- Ouzzani M, "Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews", Syst Rev, 5, pp.210~ (2016)[DOI]
- "Study quality assessment tools" (2021)[URL]
- Pan XG, "McNamara cephalometric analysis for Shanghai adolescents and adults", Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue, 5, pp.195~197 (1996)
- Sobreira CR, "Comparative study of facial proportions between Afro Brazilian and White Brazilian children from 8 to 10 years of age", Dental Press J Orthod, 16, pp.85~93 (2011)[DOI]
- AlShayea EI, "Skeleto-dental features among a sample of Saudi female children compared to British standards : a cephalometric study", Niger J Clin Pract, 25, pp.454~465 (2022)[DOI]
- Chuang SY, "Craniofacial growth changes of Mongolian children with normal occlusion from 8 to 12 years", Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 16, pp.400~413 (2000)
- Jiménez I, "Facial growth changes in a Colombian Mestizo population : an 18-year follow-up longitudinal study using linear mixed models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 157, pp.365~376 (2020)[DOI]
- Chang HP, "A study of the growth changes in facial configuration", Eur J Orthod, 15, pp.493~501 (1993)[DOI]
- Baccetti T, "Lateral cephalometric standards of Germans with normal occlusion from 6 to 17 years of age", J Orofac Orthop, 74, pp.236~256 (2013)[DOI]
- Moldez MA, "Linear and angular Filipino cephalometric norms according to age and sex", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.800~805 (2006)
- Humerfelt A, "A roentgenographic cephalometric investigation of Norwegian children with normal occlusion", Scand J Dent Res, 78, pp.117~143 (1970)[DOI]
- Obloj B, "Cephalometric standards for Polish 10-year-olds with normal occlusion", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.262~269 (2008)[DOI]
- Bishara SE, "Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97, pp.413~421 (1990)[DOI]
- Aleksić E, "Cephalometric standards for 9 year-old Serbian children with neutroocclusion", Acta Stomatol Naissi, 28, pp.1155~1163 (2012)[DOI]
- El-Batran M, "The relationship between cranial base and maxillo-facial morphology in Egyptian children", Homo, 59, pp.287~300 (2008)[DOI]
- Zhao XG, "Comparison of Chinese and white Bolton standards at age 13", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.809~816 (2013)[DOI]
- Barter MA, "Cephalometric analysis of a Sotho-Tswana group", J Dent Assoc S Afr, 50, pp.539~544 (1995)
- Thilander B, "Roentgen-cephalometric standards for a Swedish population. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years", Eur J Orthod, 27, pp.370~389 (2005)[DOI]
- Al-Taai N, "Craniofacial changes from 13 to 62 years of age", Eur J Orthod, 44, pp.556~565 (2022)[DOI]
- Ogaard B, "Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between the ages of 6 and 18 years", Eur J Orthod, 16, pp.501~509 (1994)[DOI]
- Thilander B, "Roentgencephalometric standards for the facial skeleton and soft tissue profile of Swedish children and young adults. II. Comparisons with earlier Scandinavian normative data", Swed Dent J Suppl, 15, pp.219~228 (1982)
- Jamison JE, "Longitudinal changes in the maxilla and the maxillary-mandibular relationship between 8 and 17 years of age", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.217~230 (1982)[DOI]
- Hamamci N, "Longitudinal study of untreated skeletal Class I subject's growth and development with Mc Namara cephalometric analysis", Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip, 20, pp.175~183 (2006)[DOI]
- Alió-Sanz J, "Retrospective study of maxilla growth in a Spanish population sample", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 16, pp.e271~e277 (2011)[DOI]
- Taneja JR, "Steiner's norms for North Indian pre-school children", J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 8, pp.36~37 (1991)
- Ajayi EO, "Cephalometric norms of Nigerian children", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.653~656 (2005)[DOI]
- Huang WJ, "Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasians and African Americans in Birmingham", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.503~511 (1998)
- Kapila S, "Selected cephalometric angular norms in Kikuyu children", Angle Orthod, 59, pp.139~144 (1989)
- de Freitas LM, "Facial height comparison in young white and black Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.706~ (2007)
- Bishara SE, "Cephalometric comparisons of the dentofacial relationships of two adolescent populations from Iowa and northern Mexico", Am J Orthod, 88, pp.314~322 (1985)[DOI]
- Janson G, "Craniofacial characteristics of Caucasian and Afro-Caucasian Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion", J Appl Oral Sci, 19, pp.118~124 (2011)[DOI]
- Hassan AH, "Cephalometric norms for the Saudi children living in the western region of Saudi Arabia : a research report", Head Face Med, 1, pp.5~ (2005)[DOI]
- Gleis R, "Israeli cephalometric standards compared to Downs and Steiner analyses", Angle Orthod, 60, pp.35~40 (1990)
- Kilic N, "McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion", Aust Orthod J, 26, pp.33~37 (2010)[DOI]
- Singh I, "Cephalometric evaluation of natural head position in Lingayat population of Karnataka", J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 11(Suppl 1), pp.S59~S66 (2019)[DOI]
- Storniolo-Souza JM, "McNamara analysis cephalometric parameters in White-Brazilians, Japanese and Japanese-Brazilians with normal occlusion", Dental Press J Orthod, 26, pp.e2119133~ (2021)[DOI]
- Vieira FP, "Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion", Dental Press J Orthod, 19, pp.54~66 (2014)[DOI]
- Folaranmi N, "Anterior face height values in a Nigerian population", Ann Med Health Sci Res, 3, pp.583~587 (2013)[DOI]
- Singh Rathore A, "Cephalometric norms for Mewari children using Steiner's analysis", Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 5, pp.173~177 (2012)[DOI]
- Bishara S, "Dentofacial changes in Norwegian and Iowan populations between 6 and 18 years of age", Eur J Orthod, 17, pp.241~249 (1995)[DOI]
- Hamdan AM, "Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population", J Orthod, 28, pp.297~300 (2001)[DOI]
- Alexander TL, "Cephalometric standards for American Negro children", Am J Orthod, 74, pp.298~304 (1978)[DOI]
- Beugre JB, "Comparative cephalometric study of three different ethnic groups of black Africa with normal occlusion", Odontostomatol Trop, 30, pp.34~44 (2007)
- de Freitas LM, "A comparison of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue characteristics in white and black Brazilian subjects", J Appl Oral Sci, 18, pp.135~142 (2010)[DOI]
- Gu Y, "Differences in dentofacial characteristics between southern versus northern Chinese adolescents", Aust Orthod J, 27, pp.155~161 (2011)[DOI]
- Barbosa LAG, "Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.914~920 (2017)[DOI]
- Björk A, "Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method", Acta Odontol Scand, 24, pp.109~127 (1966)[DOI]
- Lowrey GH, "Growth and development of children" (1973), Year Book Medical Publishers
- Hardin AM, "Clinical implications of age-related change of the mandibular plane angle", Orthod Craniofac Res, 23, pp.50~58 (2020)[DOI]
- "Growth-related change in the mandibular plane angle with clinical implications" (2018)[URL]
- Nahhas RW, "Variation in timing, duration, intensity, and direction of adolescent growth in the mandible, maxilla, and cranial base : the Fels longitudinal study", Anat Rec(Hoboken), 297, pp.1195~1207 (2014)[DOI]
- Marchiori GE, "Pleasantness of facial profile and its correlation with soft tissue cephalometric parameters : perception of orthodontists and lay people", Eur J Dent, 9, pp.352~355 (2015)[DOI]
