본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국의 기업가정신 활동: 2010년 글로벌기업가정신연구(GEM)를 중심으로

Entrepreneurship in Korea: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Korea 2010

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) is to build and enhance global understanding about the attitudes, activity, and aspiration of entrepreneurs. By providing greater knowledge about entrepreneurship, GEM can help governments, businesses, and educators around the world design policies, develop programs, and provide assistance to help these enterprising individuals thrive in an increasing global business environment. GEM is a consortium of national academic teams and a central coordination team. Working together, this consortium administers an adult population survey (APS) of at least 2,000individuals from 18-64 years old in each participating country. In addition, GEM conducts National Expert Surveys (NES) of at least 36 experts, to provide information about particular factors influencing entrepreneurship in each country. The analysis of NES was based on the answers from 55 experts in the 9 specified fields. This paper based on the GEM Korea 2010 report. GEM 2010 organized the 59 countries into three groups based on different economic development levels: factor-driven,efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven. Korea is among the 22 higher-income innovation-driven economies. Many of the comparisons made in this report with respect to Korea are within this group of countries. Korea ranked 7th in the TEA level in the group (ranked 8th in the TEA level in GEM 2009). In measuring entrepreneurial activity, GEM includes four phases: potential, nascent, new, and established entrepreneurs. This report focuses primarily on nascent and new entrepreneurs,which make up the Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) rate. This rate in 2010 was 6.6% of the adult population in Korea, which were lower than 7% of 2009. One distinct quality of entrepreneurship in Korea is the ratio of male to female participation in entrepreneurship. While this varies among countries across the entire sample,the innovation-driven countries generally have a male-to-female entrepreneurship ratio of two to one, with some (U.S., Germany) having a much lower ratio. Korea, however, has about a five-to-one ratio. The ratio in TEA (11.0% of men to 2.2% of women). National Expert Survey (NES) reveal that government policies and programs, market openness, physical infrastructure, culture and social norms, entrepreneurial opportunity, and social image of entrepreneur has dominant position compare with the innovation-driven economies, but financial environment, commercial infrastructures and women entrepreneurship are relatively poor.

Abstract

The purpose of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) is to build and enhance global understanding about the attitudes, activity, and aspiration of entrepreneurs. By providing greater knowledge about entrepreneurship, GEM can help governments, businesses, and educators around the world design policies, develop programs, and provide assistance to help these enterprising individuals thrive in an increasing global business environment. GEM is a consortium of national academic teams and a central coordination team. Working together, this consortium administers an adult population survey (APS) of at least 2,000individuals from 18-64 years old in each participating country. In addition, GEM conducts National Expert Surveys (NES) of at least 36 experts, to provide information about particular factors influencing entrepreneurship in each country. The analysis of NES was based on the answers from 55 experts in the 9 specified fields. This paper based on the GEM Korea 2010 report. GEM 2010 organized the 59 countries into three groups based on different economic development levels: factor-driven,efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven. Korea is among the 22 higher-income innovation-driven economies. Many of the comparisons made in this report with respect to Korea are within this group of countries. Korea ranked 7th in the TEA level in the group (ranked 8th in the TEA level in GEM 2009). In measuring entrepreneurial activity, GEM includes four phases: potential, nascent, new, and established entrepreneurs. This report focuses primarily on nascent and new entrepreneurs,which make up the Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) rate. This rate in 2010 was 6.6% of the adult population in Korea, which were lower than 7% of 2009. One distinct quality of entrepreneurship in Korea is the ratio of male to female participation in entrepreneurship. While this varies among countries across the entire sample,the innovation-driven countries generally have a male-to-female entrepreneurship ratio of two to one, with some (U.S., Germany) having a much lower ratio. Korea, however, has about a five-to-one ratio. The ratio in TEA (11.0% of men to 2.2% of women). National Expert Survey (NES) reveal that government policies and programs, market openness, physical infrastructure, culture and social norms, entrepreneurial opportunity, and social image of entrepreneur has dominant position compare with the innovation-driven economies, but financial environment, commercial infrastructures and women entrepreneurship are relatively poor.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 배종태, "기업가정신의 확장과 활성화", 중소기업연구, 31(1), pp.109~128 (2009), 한국중소기업학회
  2. 조영복, "부산지역 사회적기업가를 위한 사회적기업 육성에 대한 연구", 인적자원관리연구, 16(2), pp.231~244 (2009), 한국인적자원관리학회
  3. 2009년 11월중 신설법인 동향, "중소기업청", ~ (2009)
  4. 창업지원체계 수립, "차민석", 창업진흥원, ~ (2010)
  5. Acs, Z. J., "Geography and American Economic Growth" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  6. Acs, Z. J., "Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Dynamics in Latin America", Small Business Economics, 31(3), pp.305~322 (2008)
  7. Acs, Z .J., "The Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEINDEX)", Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 5(5), pp.341~435 (2009)
  8. Acs, Z. J., "Entrepreneurship, Agglomeration and Technological change", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.323~343 (2005)
  9. Acs, Z. J., "Foundations of High Impact Entrepreneurship", Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 4(6), pp.535~620 (2008)
  10. Acs, Z. J., "How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth", Innovations, 1(1), pp.97~107 (2006)
  11. Audretsch, D. B., "Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Growth", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(1), pp.63~78 (2007)
  12. Autio, E., "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 Global Report on High Growth Entrepreneurship" (2007), London Business School and Babson Park
  13. Baumol, W. J., "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive", Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp.893~921 (1990)
  14. Baumol, W. J., "Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs" (1993), MITPress
  15. Bergmann, H., "The Changing Face of Entrepreneurship in Germany", Small Business Economics, 28(2), pp.205~221 (2007)
  16. Bosma, N. S., "The Geography of Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Economic Development. Multilevel Analysis for Dutch and European Regions", 박사, pp.2009
  17. Bosma, N., "“Intrapreneurship: An International study,” EIM Research Report, forthcoming, Zoetermeer" (2010), EIM
  18. Bosma, N. S., "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2008 Executive Report" (2009), Babson College;Universidad del Desarollo and London;London Business School
  19. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2009 Executive Report, "Bosma, N. S.", Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, ~ (2010)
  20. Brock, D. D., "Social Entrepreneurship Teaching Resources Handbook" (2008), Ashoka
  21. Social Enterprise Action Plan: Scaling New Height, "Cabinet Office", ~ (2006)
  22. Carree, M., "The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth, In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research", pp.437~471 (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  23. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, "Donna K.", 2010, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, ~ (2010)
  24. Gartner, W. B., "A Framework for Describing and Classifying the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation", Academy of Management Review, 10(4), pp.696~706 (1985)
  25. Entrepreneurship and Structural Economic Transformation, "Gries, T.", UNUWider Research Papers, ~ (2008)
  26. Henley, A., "Entrepreneurial Aspiration and Transition into Self-Employment: Evidence from British Longitudinal Data", Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(3), pp.245~280 (2007)
  27. Kao, J. J., "The Entrepreneurial Organization" (1991), Prentice Hall
  28. Kihlstrom, R. E., "A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion", Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp.719~749 (1979)
  29. Entrepreneurship and the Business Cycle, "Koellinger P.", Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University, ~, pp.Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2009-032 (2009), 3
  30. EIM Business and Policy Research, "Rotterdam", Tinbergen Institute, ~
  31. Levie, J, "A Theoretical Grounding and Test of the GEM Model", Small Business Economics, 23, pp.5~263 (2008)
  32. Lucas, R. E., Jr., "On the Size Distribution of Business Firms", Bell Journal of Economics, 9, pp.508~523 (1978)
  33. Lumpkin, G. T., "Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance", Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135~172 (1996)
  34. Mair, J., "Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction and Delight", Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.36~44 (2006)
  35. Parker, S. C., "The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  36. Executive Summary: Competitiveness and Stages of Economic Development, "Porter, M. E.", 16~25, pp.The Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2 (2002)
  37. Reynolds, P., "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation, 1998-2003", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.205~231 (2005)
  38. Schumpeter, J. A., "The Theory of Economic Development" (1934), Harvard University Press
  39. Schumpeter, J. A., "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" (1942), Harper and Row
  40. "World Economic Forum"[URL]
  41. Shane, S., "A General Theory of Entrepreneurship; The Individual-Opportunity Nexus" (2003), Edward Elgar
  42. Shane, S., "The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research", Academy of Management Review, 25, pp.217~226 (2000)
  43. Short, J. C., "Research in Social Entrepreneurship: Past Contributions and Future Opportunities", Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, pp.161~194 (2009)
  44. The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010, "Schwab, Klaus", World Economic Forum, ~ (2010)
  45. Sternberg, R., "The Determinants and Effects of New Business Creation Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.193~203 (2005)
  46. Van DeVen, A., "Entrepreneurial Pursuits of Self- and Collective Interests", Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3), pp.353~370 (2008)
  47. Van Stel, A. J., "The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.311~321 (2005)
  48. Wennekers, A. R. M., "Nascent Entrepreneurship and the Level of Economic Development", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.293~309 (2005)
  49. Zahra, S. A., "A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes and Ethical Challenges", Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), pp.519~532 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)