한국의 기업가정신 활동: 2011년 글로벌기업가정신연구(GEM)를 중심으로
Entrepreneurship in Korea: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Korea 2011
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
All over the globe policy makers and academics agree that entrepreneurship plays a critical role for the development and well-being of society. The purpose of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) is to build and enhance global understanding about the attitudes, activity, and aspiration of entrepreneurs. GEM was conceived in 1997 by Michael Hay of London Business School (LBS) and Bill Bygrave of Babson College. LBS and Babson funded a prototype study that year. Ten national teams conducted the first GEM Global study in 1999. GEM is a consortium of national academic teams and a central coordination team. Working together, this consortium administers an adult population survey (APS) of at least 2,000 individuals from 18-64 years old in each participating country. In addition, GEM conducts National Expert Surveys (NES) of at least 36 experts, to provide information about particular factors influencing entrepreneurship in each country. The analysis of NES in Korea was based on the answers from 41 experts in the 9 specified fields. This paper was based on the GEM Korea 2011 report. GEM 2011 organized the 55 countries into three groups based on different economic development levels: factor-driven, efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven. Korea is among the 23 higher-income innovation-driven economies. Many of the comparisons made in this report with respect to Korea are within this group of countries. Korea ranked 6th in the TEA level in the group (ranked 7th among 22 countries in the TEA level in GEM 2010). In measuring entrepreneurial activity, GEM includes four phases: potential, nascent, new, and established entrepreneurs. This report focuses primarily on nascent and new entrepreneurs, which make up the Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) rate. This rate in 2011 was 7.8% of the adult population in Korea, which were higher than 6.6% of 2010. One distinct quality of entrepreneurship in Korea is the ratio of male to female participation in entrepreneurship. While this varies among countries across the entire sample, the innovation-driven countries generally have a male-to-female entrepreneurship ratio of two to one, with some (U.S., Australia, etc.) having a much lower ratio. Korea, however, has about a three-to-one ratio. The ratio in TEA (11.7% of men to 3.8% of women). Entrepreneurial profile of Republic of Korea has different outlook with innovation-driven economies and the reference group especially in terms of perceived opportunities, perceived capabilities and necessity-driven TEA rate. Perceived opportunities and perceived capabilities are much lower than the comparative groups, and necessity-driven TEA is much higher than the groups. It is noteworthy that TEA rate is a little higher than the comparative groups despite the low entrepreneurial attitudes. And entrepreneurial Employee Activity Rate (EEA) of the adult population in Korea was 2,4%, which were much lowe ratio than 4.6% average of innovation driven countries. Looking into the TEA sector structure of Republic of Korea, consumer oriented services comprise the most part, and transforming sector and business oriented services follow. Extractive sector comprises the least. You can observe the similar pattern with established business sector structure. In established business activity, transforming sector is much bigger than the TEA and consumer oriented services are smaller than the TEA. National Expert Survey (NES) reveal that Korea has an outstanding physical infrastructure and internal market dynamics in the entrepreneurial environment. In contrast, the professional & commercial sector has been weak in the past few years.
Abstract
All over the globe policy makers and academics agree that entrepreneurship plays a critical role for the development and well-being of society. The purpose of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) is to build and enhance global understanding about the attitudes, activity, and aspiration of entrepreneurs. GEM was conceived in 1997 by Michael Hay of London Business School (LBS) and Bill Bygrave of Babson College. LBS and Babson funded a prototype study that year. Ten national teams conducted the first GEM Global study in 1999. GEM is a consortium of national academic teams and a central coordination team. Working together, this consortium administers an adult population survey (APS) of at least 2,000 individuals from 18-64 years old in each participating country. In addition, GEM conducts National Expert Surveys (NES) of at least 36 experts, to provide information about particular factors influencing entrepreneurship in each country. The analysis of NES in Korea was based on the answers from 41 experts in the 9 specified fields. This paper was based on the GEM Korea 2011 report. GEM 2011 organized the 55 countries into three groups based on different economic development levels: factor-driven, efficiency-driven, and innovation-driven. Korea is among the 23 higher-income innovation-driven economies. Many of the comparisons made in this report with respect to Korea are within this group of countries. Korea ranked 6th in the TEA level in the group (ranked 7th among 22 countries in the TEA level in GEM 2010). In measuring entrepreneurial activity, GEM includes four phases: potential, nascent, new, and established entrepreneurs. This report focuses primarily on nascent and new entrepreneurs, which make up the Total Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) rate. This rate in 2011 was 7.8% of the adult population in Korea, which were higher than 6.6% of 2010. One distinct quality of entrepreneurship in Korea is the ratio of male to female participation in entrepreneurship. While this varies among countries across the entire sample, the innovation-driven countries generally have a male-to-female entrepreneurship ratio of two to one, with some (U.S., Australia, etc.) having a much lower ratio. Korea, however, has about a three-to-one ratio. The ratio in TEA (11.7% of men to 3.8% of women). Entrepreneurial profile of Republic of Korea has different outlook with innovation-driven economies and the reference group especially in terms of perceived opportunities, perceived capabilities and necessity-driven TEA rate. Perceived opportunities and perceived capabilities are much lower than the comparative groups, and necessity-driven TEA is much higher than the groups. It is noteworthy that TEA rate is a little higher than the comparative groups despite the low entrepreneurial attitudes. And entrepreneurial Employee Activity Rate (EEA) of the adult population in Korea was 2,4%, which were much lowe ratio than 4.6% average of innovation driven countries. Looking into the TEA sector structure of Republic of Korea, consumer oriented services comprise the most part, and transforming sector and business oriented services follow. Extractive sector comprises the least. You can observe the similar pattern with established business sector structure. In established business activity, transforming sector is much bigger than the TEA and consumer oriented services are smaller than the TEA. National Expert Survey (NES) reveal that Korea has an outstanding physical infrastructure and internal market dynamics in the entrepreneurial environment. In contrast, the professional & commercial sector has been weak in the past few years.
참고문헌 (30)
- 글로벌기업가정신 연구(GEM)2010 연구보고서, "반성식", 경남과학기술대학교, 2011
- 글로벌기업가정신 연구(GEM)2011 연구보고서, "반성식", 경남과학기술대학교, 2012
- 휴먼네트워크와 기업경영, "정명호", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2005)
- "조선일보(2011), 2011년 1월 20일", ~ (2011)
- 한국벤처투자, "VCPE Monthly", 5~ (2012)
- 한종희, "모험기업에 대한 모험자본회사의 관리", 지원활동 효과에 관한 상황적 분석, 韓國科學技術院, 1992
- Acs, Z. J., "Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Dynamics in Latin America", Small Business Economics, 31(3), pp.305~322 (2008)
- Acs, Z. J., "The Global Entrepreneurship Index(GEINDEX)", Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 5(5), pp.341~435 (2009)
- Acs, Z. J., "Entrepreneurship, Agglomeration and Technological hange", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.323~343 (2005)
- Aldrich, H. E., "The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: A longitudinal study, In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research", pp.154~168 (1987), Babson College
- Baumol, W. J., "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive", Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp.893~921 (1990)
- Birley, S., "The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process", Journal of Business Venturing, 1, pp.107~117 (1985)
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2008 Executive Report, "Bosma, N. S.", Universidad del Desarollo and London, ~ (2009)
- Bosma, N., "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011", ~ (2012)
- Extended Report: Entrepreneurs and Entrepreneurial Employees Across the Globe, , Global Entrepreneurship Research Association(GERA), ~
- Bruderl, J., "Network Support and the Sucess of Newly Founded Business", Small Business Economics, 10, pp.213~225 (1998)
- Granovetter, M., "Economic action and social structure : The problem of embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481~510 (1982)
- "Harvard Business Review (2011), 2011. 1", 2, 2011
- Jarillo, J., "Entrepreneurship and Growth : the Strategic Use of External Resources", Journal of Business Venturing, 4, pp.133~147 (1987)
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2010, "Kelley, D.", Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, ~ (2010)
- Kelly, D. J., "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011 Global Report" (2012), Global Entrepreneurship Research Association
- Entrepreneurship and the Business Cycle, "Koellinger P.", Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, EIM Business and Policy Research, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands, Tinbergen Institute, ~, pp.Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2009-032 (2009), 3
- Littunen, H., "Networking and Local Environmental Characteristics in the Survival of New Firms", Small Business Economics, 15, pp.59~71 (2000)
- Ostgarrd, T. A., "Personal Network and Firm Competitive Strategies-a strategic or coincidential match?", Journal of Business Venturing, 9, pp.281~305 (1994)
- Porter, M. E., "Executive Summary: Competitiveness and Stages of Economic Development, In The Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2002", pp.16~25 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Reynolds, P., "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor : Data Collection Design and Implementation, 1998-2003", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.205~231 (2005)
- "Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010" (2009)[URL]
- Sternberg, R., "The Determinants and Effects of New Business Creation Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data", Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp.193~203 (2005)
- Watson, J., "Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance", Journal of Business Venturing, 21, pp.1~6 (2006)
- Zhao, L., "Networking and Growth of Young Technology-Intensive Ventures in China", Journal of Business Venturing, 10, pp.349~370 (1995)
