论子产治国理政思想特质— 以『左传』和『韩非子』的文体和观念为中心
On Zichan’s Thoughts on Governing the Country: Centered on the Style and Concept of Zuozhuan and Han Feizi
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
左传』是一部集经学、史学和文学于一体的重要典籍。左丘明在创作『左传』时似乎没有明确的文体意识，但实际撰写中灵活运用了多种文体。从文体学的角度分析『左传』的文风可以更深刻地认识『左传』一书的性质与风貌。 『韩非子』在先秦诸子中具有独特的风格，思想犀利，逻辑严密。但是与其他诸子相比较,文体不具有十分明显的特点。学术界对 『韩非子』和『左传』文体特点分析较少，笔者在深入分析 『韩非子』和『左传』及相关文献的基础上，主要运用文体学理论，采用文献分析法、比较研究法，并与中国传统文化某些特点相融合，从文体演变和文化学的角度通过考察『左传』来论述『韩非子』中关于子产的内容， 从文体和观念的角度考察 『韩非子』 的学术思想特质和与 『左传』 的差异。并对『韩非子』是如何记述子产的言行， 『韩非子』和 『左传』两书之间的关系进行探讨？通过深入分析与严密论证，笔者认为『左传』与 『韩非子』属于并列关系。左丘明和韩非所记述史事基本相同，但由于两人不同的观念，论着文体也大为不同。在两书中描写子产史事并未有太大差别，然而由于儒家和法家的观念差异，以及论赞、预言、辞令与经说、论辩、难的文体差异， 竟然呈现了两个面貌不同的子产。『左传』和『韩非子』的文体特征及其文化意蕴具有巨大的文学批评价值。
Abstract
Zuo Zhuan is an important classic that integrates classics， history and literature. Zuo Qiuming didn't seem to have a clear sense of style when he created Zuo Zhuan ， but he used a variety of styles flexibly in his actual writing. Analyzing the writing style of Zuo Zhuan from the perspective of stylistics can give a deeper understanding of the nature and style of Zuo Zhuan . Han Feizi has a unique style among the pre-Qin scholars， with sharp thinking and strict logic. But compared with other philosophers， the style does not have very obvious characteristics. The academic circles have seldom analyzed the style characteristics of Han Feizi and Zuo Zhuan . On the basis of in-depth analysis of Han Feizi and Zuo Zhuan and related documents，Mainly use the theory of stylistics， adopt the method of literature analysis and comparative research， and integrate with some characteristics of Chinese traditional culture， from the perspective of stylistic evolution and cultural studies， discuss Zuo Zhuan about Zichan in Han Feizi From the perspective of style and concept， it examines the academic and ideological characteristics of Han Feizi and the differences with Zuo Zhuan .And discuss how HanFeizi records Zichan's words and deeds， and the relationship between Han Feizi and Zuo Zhuan ?Through in-depth analysis and rigorous demonstration， the author believes that Zuo Zhuan and Han Feizi belong to a parallel relationship. The historical events described by Zuo Qiuming and Han Fei are basically the same， but due to their different concepts， the writing styles are also quite different.There is not much difference in the description of Zuo Zhuan’s historical events in the two books. However， due to the differences in the concepts of Confucianism and Legalism， as well as the differences in the style of praise， prophecy， rhetoric and scriptures， debates， and difficulties， there are actually two faces. different offspring. The stylistic features and cultural connotations of Zuo Zhuan and Han Feizi have great literary criticism value.
참고문헌 (22)
- 程荣纂辑, "汉魏丛书 (明万历新安程氏刊本影印)" (1992), 吉林大学出版社
- 傅亚庶, "孔丛子校释" (2011), 中华书局
- 黄晖, "论衡校释" (1990), 中华书局
- 蒋礼鸿, "商君书锥指" (1986), 中华书局
- 李炳海, "｢国风｣郑诗的结集及其时代特征", 中州学刊, (04) (2010)
- 林永光, "子产政治观评析", 烟台师范学院学报, (03) (1999)
- 阮元校刻, "十三经注疏" (1980), 中华书局
- 史念海, "郑韩故城溯源", 中国历史地理论丛, (04) (1998)
- 萧统编, "文选" (1986), 上海古籍出版社
- 王先慎, "韩非子集解" (1998), 中华书局
- 王先慎, "韩非子集解" (2003), 中华书局
- 王先慎, "左传" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
- 卫军, "左传集评" (2016), 北京大学出版社
- 向宗鲁, "说苑校证" (1987), 中华书局
- 徐坚, "初学记" (2004), 中华书局
- 徐团辉, "韩国迁都宜阳、阳翟考辨", 华夏考古, (02) (2015)
- 许维遹, "吕氏春秋集释" (2009), 中华书局
- 杨伯峻, "春秋左传注 (修订本)" (1990), 中华书局
- 杨伯峻, "春秋左传注" (2016), 中华书局
- 张亮采, "中国风俗史" (1996), 东方出版社
- 章太炎, "章太炎全集" (2014), 上海人民出版社
- 周勋初, "韩非子札记" (2021), 凤凰出版社