본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of human and organizational deficiencies on workers’ safety behavior at a mining site in Iran

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

OBJECTIVES:Throughout the world, mines are dangerous workplaces with high accident rates. According to the Statistical Center of Iran, the number of occupational accidents in Iranian mines has increased in recent years. This study investigated and analyzed the human and organizational deficiencies that influenced Iranian mining accidents. METHODS: In this study, the data associated with 305 mining accidents were analyzed using a systems analysis approach to identify critical deficiencies in organizational influences, unsafe supervision, preconditions for unsafe acts, and workers’ unsafe acts. Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was utilized to model the interactions among these deficiencies. RESULTS: Organizational deficiencies had a direct positive effect on workers’ violations (path coefficient, 0.16) and workers’ errors (path coefficient, 0.23). The effect of unsafe supervision on workers’ violations and workers’ errors was also significant, with path coefficients of 0.14 and 0.20, respectively. Likewise, preconditions for unsafe acts had a significant effect on both workers’ violations (path coefficient, 0.16) and workers’ errors (path coefficient, 0.21). Moreover, organizational deficiencies had an indirect positive effect on workers’ unsafe acts, mediated by unsafe supervision and preconditions for unsafe acts. Among the variables examined in the current study, organizational influences had the strongest impact on workers’ unsafe acts. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational deficiencies were found to be the main cause of accidents in the mining sector, as they affected all other aspects of system safety. In order to prevent occupational accidents, organizational deficiencies should be modified first.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:Throughout the world, mines are dangerous workplaces with high accident rates. According to the Statistical Center of Iran, the number of occupational accidents in Iranian mines has increased in recent years. This study investigated and analyzed the human and organizational deficiencies that influenced Iranian mining accidents. METHODS: In this study, the data associated with 305 mining accidents were analyzed using a systems analysis approach to identify critical deficiencies in organizational influences, unsafe supervision, preconditions for unsafe acts, and workers’ unsafe acts. Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was utilized to model the interactions among these deficiencies. RESULTS: Organizational deficiencies had a direct positive effect on workers’ violations (path coefficient, 0.16) and workers’ errors (path coefficient, 0.23). The effect of unsafe supervision on workers’ violations and workers’ errors was also significant, with path coefficients of 0.14 and 0.20, respectively. Likewise, preconditions for unsafe acts had a significant effect on both workers’ violations (path coefficient, 0.16) and workers’ errors (path coefficient, 0.21). Moreover, organizational deficiencies had an indirect positive effect on workers’ unsafe acts, mediated by unsafe supervision and preconditions for unsafe acts. Among the variables examined in the current study, organizational influences had the strongest impact on workers’ unsafe acts. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational deficiencies were found to be the main cause of accidents in the mining sector, as they affected all other aspects of system safety. In order to prevent occupational accidents, organizational deficiencies should be modified first.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Bonsu J, "A systemic study of mining accident causality: an analysis of 91 mining accidents from a platinum mine in South Africa", J South Afr Inst Min Metall, 117, pp.59~66 (2017)[DOI]
  2. Bonsu J, "A systems approach to mining safety: an application of the Swiss cheese model", J South Afr Inst Min Metall, 116, pp.776~784 (2016)[DOI]
  3. "A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system"[URL]
  4. Sanmiquel L, "Analysis of work related accidents in the Spanish mining sector from 1982-2006", J Safety Res, 41, pp.1~7 (2010)[DOI]
  5. Martin JE, "A Bayesian network analysis of workplace accidents caused by falls from a height", Saf Sci, 47, pp.206~214 (2009)[DOI]
  6. Zhang M, "Investigation of haul truck-related fatal accidents in surface mining using fault tree analysis", Saf Sci, 65, pp.106~117 (2014)[DOI]
  7. Ural S, "Evaluation of occupational safety and health in surface mines", Saf Sci, 46, pp.1016~1024 (2008)[DOI]
  8. Leveson N, "A new accident model for engineering safer systems", Saf Sci, 42, pp.237~270 (2004)[DOI]
  9. Reason J, "Human error", pp.173~216 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  10. Salmon PM, "Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP", Saf Sci, 50, pp.1158~1170 (2012)[DOI]
  11. Chen ST, "A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA)", Saf Sci, 60, pp.105~114 (2013)[DOI]
  12. Wang YF, "Accident analysis model based on Bayesian Network and Evidential Reasoning approach", J Loss Prev Process Ind, 26, pp.10~21 (2013)[DOI]
  13. Mitchell RJ, "Application of a human factors classification framework for patient safety to identify precursor and contributing factors to adverse clinical incidents in hospital", Appl Ergon, 52, pp.185~195 (2016)[DOI]
  14. Diller T, "The human factors analysis classification system (HFACS) applied to health care", Am J Med Qual, 29, pp.181~190 (2014)[DOI]
  15. Zhan Q, "A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs)", Saf Sci, 91, pp.232~250 (2017)[DOI]
  16. Reinach S, "Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident", incident investigations, 2006, pp.38, 396~406
  17. Patterson JM, "Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS", Accid Anal Prev, 42, pp.1379~1385 (2010)[DOI]
  18. Lenne MG, "A systems approach to accident causation in mining: an application of the HFACS method", Accid Anal Prev, 48, pp.111~117 (2012)[DOI]
  19. Shikha Verma, "Safety of Workers in Indian Mines: Study, Analysis, and Prediction", Safety and Health at Work, 8(3), pp.267~275 (2017), 한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원[DOI]
  20. Bagherpour R, "Safety survey of Iran's mines and comparison to some other countries", Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot, 24, pp.3~9 (2017)[DOI]
  21. "Survey results of Iran's active mines in 2012"[URL]
  22. Chung JH, "Structural model of automobile demand in Korea", Transp Res Rec, 1807, pp.87~91 (2002)[DOI]
  23. Golob TF, "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research", Transport Res B Meth, 37, pp.1~25 (2003)[DOI]
  24. Sarstedt M, "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers", J Fam Bus Strategy, 5, pp.105~115 (2014)[DOI]
  25. Hair JF, "An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research", J Acad Mark Sci, 40, pp.414~433 (2012)[DOI]
  26. Wilson P, "Root cause analysis: a tool for total quality management", pp.8~17 (1993), ASQC Quality Press
  27. Zhang Y, "Analysis 320 coal mine accidents using structural equation modeling with unsafe conditions of the rules and regulations as exogenous variables", Accid Anal Prev, 92, pp.189~201 (2016)[DOI]
  28. "PLS path modeling with R"[URL]
  29. Wetzels M, "Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guide-lines and empirical illustration", MIS Q, 33, pp.177~195 (2009)[DOI]
  30. Cohen J, "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences", pp.407~465 (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  31. Hair JF, "A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)", pp.167~201 (2013), Sage Publications
  32. Goh YM, "Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture", Saf Sci, 48, pp.302~309 (2010)[DOI]
  33. Dekker S, "The complexity of failure: implications of complexity theory for safety investigations", Saf Sci, 49, pp.939~945 (2011)[DOI]
  34. Dekker SW, "Cognitive engineering and the moral theology and witchcraft of cause", Cogn Technol Work, 14, pp.207~212 (2012)[DOI]
  35. Oliver A, "The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents", J Occup Organ Psychol, 75, pp.473~488 (2002)[DOI]
  36. Brown KA, "Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: development and test of a sociotechnical model", J Oper Manag, 18, pp.445~465 (2000)[DOI]
  37. Ghasemi F, "A path analysis model for explaining unsafe behavior in workplaces: the effect of perceived work pressure", Int J Occup Saf Ergon, 24, pp.303~310 (2018)
  38. Zarei E, "Efficiency prediction of control room operators based on human reliability analysis and dynamic decision-making style in the process industry", Process Saf Prog, 35, pp.192~199 (2016)[DOI]
  39. Fugas CS, "Another look at safety climate and safety behavior: deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms", Accid Anal Prev, 45, pp.468~477 (2012)[DOI]
  40. Mullen J, "Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work", J Safety Res, 35, pp.275~285 (2004)[DOI]
  41. Choudhry RM, "Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: investigating factors on construction sites", Saf Sci, 46, pp.566~584 (2008)[DOI]
  42. Mohammadfam I, "Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces", Appl Ergon, 58, pp.35~47 (2017)[DOI]
  43. Fakhradin Ghasemi, "Surprising Incentive: An Instrument for Promoting Safety Performance of Construction Employees", Safety and Health at Work, 6(3), pp.227~232 (2015), 한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원[DOI]
  44. Ghasemi F, "Selecting strategies to reduce high-risk unsafe work behaviors using the safety behavior sampling technique and Bayesian network analysis", J Res Health Sci, 17, pp.e00372~ (2017)
  45. Ramsey JD, "Effects of workplace thermal conditions on safe work behavior", J Safety Res, 14, pp.105~114 (1983)[DOI]
  46. Zhen-Dong LI, "SEM-based study on effects of organizational and environmental factors on workers' unsafe behavior", China Saf Sci J, 11, pp.004~ (2012)
  47. Hopkins A, "Making safety work: getting management commitment to occupational health and safety", pp.117~123 (1995), Allen and Unwin
  48. Strauch B, "Can we examine safety culture in accident investigations, or should we?", Saf Sci, 77, pp.102~111 (2015)[DOI]
  49. Neal A, "The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior", Saf Sci, 34, pp.99~109 (2000)[DOI]
  50. Mirzaei Aliabadi M, "Analysis of human and organizational factors that influence mining accidents based on Bayesian network", Int J Occup Saf Ergon (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Analysis of the severity of occupational injuries in the mining industry using a Bayesian networkAli Reza Soltanian, Asghar Nikravesh, Hamed Aghaei, Mostafa Mirzaei Aliabadi, Omid Kalatpuor한국역학회 · Epidemiology and Health2019 · 제41권 SEM-based study on the impact of safety culture on unsafe behaviors in Chinese nuclear power plantsDai Licao, Liang Ziyi, Ma Li, Zhang Meihui한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2023 · 제55권 제10호The Relationships Among Occupational Safety Climate, Patient Safety Climate, and Safety Performance Based on Structural Equation ModelingHamed Aghaei, Hassan Ahmadinia, Mostafa Mirzaei Aliabadi, Zahra Sadat Asadi대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2020 · 제53권 제6호The Moderating Effect of Digital Human-Based Safety Education on the Relationship between Safety Culture, Safety Awareness, and Safety Participation Behavior of Foreign Workers*노영희, 장종화융합연구학회 · The Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies2024 · 제8권 제1호안전관리시스템 요인이 안전성과에 미치는 영향: 현장 종사자를 중심으로이동원, 조정래한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2019 · 제30권 제3호What Influences the Utilization of Personal Protective Equipment in Construction? Insights Derived from Factor Analysis and a Systematic Review누완티 산살라, 라지타 가우설야(사)위기관리이론과실천 · Journal of Safety and Crisis Management2025 · 제15권 제8호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (61건)