국제상사중재에 있어서 중재지의 의미
The meaning of the place of arbitration on the international commercial arbitration
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to make research on the meaning and function of the place of arbitration for the international commercial arbitration. For this purpose is to analyse regal issue the meaning and function of the place of arbitration on the international commercial arbitration relating to the arbitration law and the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In this Article is dealt with Art. 2 para. 1 of the Korean Arbitration Act(KAA). The KAA corresponds with the connection to the place of arbitration, the internationally prevailing ‘the principle of territoriality’. The place of arbitration is therefore great practical relevance, as there is not only the existing legal supplements on the arbitration procedure applies, but also in the state courts rule for the support and control of the tribunal are responsible. In this context, this article first intends the importance of the place of arbitration for determination of the applicable procedural law. Secondly, this article intends the importance of the place of arbitration for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under “the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards(New York Convention)”. In conclusion, this article stresses, that the place of arbitration setting under Article 21 para. 1 KAA determine not only the applicable arbitration law, but also the jurisdiction of state courts in lawsuit for repeal of arbitration and qualification as a domestic or foreign arbitration award.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to make research on the meaning and function of the place of arbitration for the international commercial arbitration. For this purpose is to analyse regal issue the meaning and function of the place of arbitration on the international commercial arbitration relating to the arbitration law and the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. In this Article is dealt with Art. 2 para. 1 of the Korean Arbitration Act(KAA). The KAA corresponds with the connection to the place of arbitration, the internationally prevailing ‘the principle of territoriality’. The place of arbitration is therefore great practical relevance, as there is not only the existing legal supplements on the arbitration procedure applies, but also in the state courts rule for the support and control of the tribunal are responsible. In this context, this article first intends the importance of the place of arbitration for determination of the applicable procedural law. Secondly, this article intends the importance of the place of arbitration for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under “the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards(New York Convention)”. In conclusion, this article stresses, that the place of arbitration setting under Article 21 para. 1 KAA determine not only the applicable arbitration law, but also the jurisdiction of state courts in lawsuit for repeal of arbitration and qualification as a domestic or foreign arbitration award.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강병근, "국제중재의 기본문제" (2000), 소화
- 고범준, "국제상사중재법 해의" (1985), 대한상사중재원
- 김홍규, "중재판정의 국적(춘제 현승종박사 화갑기념 법사상과 민사법)" (1979), 국민서관
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2001), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제상사중재에서 중재판정의 취소", 국제거래법연구, 16(1) (2007), 국제거래법학회
- 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구" (2007), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제상사중재에서 분쟁의 실체에 적용될 준거법", 법학논총, 23(1) (2006), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 송상현, "국제상사중재에 적용될 절차법에 관한 일고", 민사재판의 제문제, 7 (1993), 한국사법행정학회
- 오석웅, "국제상사중재판정의 준거법선택에 있어서 당사자자치의 원칙", 중재연구, 17(1) (2007), 한국중재학회
- 이강빈, "국제중재에 있어서 중재합의의 준거법결정에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 15(2) (2005), 한국중재학회
- 양병회, "주석중재법" (2006), 대한상사중재원
- 이호원, "개정중재법에 관한 소고" (2001), 대한상사중재원
- 이호원, "외국중재판정의 승인과 집행, 「섭외사건의 제문제(하)」" (1986), 법원행정처
- 장문철, "현대중재법의 이해" (2000), 세창출판사
- "대한상사중재원 홈페이지"[URL]
- "Basedow, J?rgen, "Vertragsstatut und Arbitrage nach neuem IPR", JPS 1 1987", ~ (1987)
- "Berger, Kalus Peter, “Das neue deutsche Schiedsverfahrensrech”, DZWiR 1998", ~ (1998)
- "Berger, Kalus Peter, Internationale Wirtschaftsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit: verfahrens- and materiellrechtliche Grundprobleme im Spiegel moderner Schiedsgesetze and Schiedspraxis, K?ln", Berlin, pp.1991, ~
- B?ckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, "Die Bestimmung des anwendbaren Rechts in der Praxis internationales Schiedsgerichtsverfahren" (1979), FS Beitzke
- Bucher, Andreas, "Die neue interantionale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in der Schweiz" (1989), Verlag Helbing & Lichtenhahn
- "Calavros, Constantin, Das UNCITRAL-Modellgesetz ?ber die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit(Diss. Bielefeld), 1988", ~ (1988)
- Drobnig, Ulrich, "Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und wirtschaftsrechtliche Eingriffsnormen" (1987), FS Kegel
- "Husslein-Stich, Gabriel, Das UNCITRAL-Modellgesetz ?ber die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit(Diss. K?ln), 1990", ~ (1990)
- "von Hoffmann, Bernd, Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit(Diss. Frankfurt", M.), Berlin 1970, 1970
- Kronke, Herbert, "Internationale Schiedsverfahren nach der Reform" (1988), RIW
- "Labes, Hubertus W.", L?rcher, Torsten, "Das neue deutsche Recht der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit- Zur bevorstehenden Neufassung des 10. Buches der ZPO (㎣1025 ff.) -", MDR 1997, 1997
- "L?rcher, Hieke, Das internationale Handelsschiedsverfahren in Frankreich(Diss. K?ln), 1977", ~ (1977)
- Sandrock, Otto, "Welches Kollisionsrecht hat ein internationales Schiedsgericht anzuwenden" (1992), RIW
- "Schlosser, Peter, Das Recht der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, 2. Aufl., T?bingen, 1989", ~ (1989)
- Schwab, Karl-Heinz, "Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit" (1995), C.H.Beck
- Triebel, Volker, "Das neue englische Schiedsgerichtsgesetz" (1997), Bertiebs-Berater