미국중재에서의 임시처분에 관한 고찰
Interim Measures in the United States' Arbitration
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
This paper investigates what are the types and legal grounds for interim measures in the U.S. arbitration practices. The statutory ground for the interim measures is the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act. Another ground, probably the most important, is the parties' own intentions to adopt the interim measures in their arbitration proceeding. Most typical interim measures in arbitration include preliminary injuction, attachment and antisuit injunction. In the U.S ex parte motion for interim measure is rarely allowed while the Revised UNCITRAL Model Law specified an ex parte interim measure. In launching the interim measures, the US courts have demanded several requirements including imparability, probability of success and passing of the balance test. In general, the U.S. courts have properly interfered with the procedural issues in arbitration unreined but leaving the substantive issues untouched. It is believed that such interference has helped to enhance the credibility in arbitration with respect to fairness and justice
참고문헌 (52)
- 윤진기, "중국 CIETAC 중재규칙상의 보전신청에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 13(2), pp.47~68 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 이강빈, "국제상사중재에서 중재판정부의 권한과 임시적 처분에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 18(2), pp.103~127 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 하충룡, "최근 미연방대법원의 판례를 통한 중재합의조항 분리원칙(Doctrine of Separability)의 재평가", 국제상학, 21(3), pp.155~177 (2006), 한국국제상학회
- "한국중재법", ~
- Gilleran Michael C., "Massachusetts Prejudgement Security Devices: Attachment, Trustee Process, and Reach and Apply", 69 Mass L. Rev., 156 (1984)
- Monestier Tanya J., "Nothing Comes of Nothing ...", 12 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb, 223 (2001)
- Rau Alan Scott, "Integrity in Private Judging", 38 S. Tex. L. Rev., 484 (1997)
- Rau Alan Scott, "Provisional Relief in Arbitration: How Things Stand in the United States", Journal of International Arbitration, 22(1) (2005)
- Sugg Jeremy, "INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION IN NORTH CAROLINA: WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE WE SHOULD BE LOOKING", 30 Campbell L. Rev., 389 (2008)
- Wong Jarrod, "THE ISSUANCE OF INTERIM MEASURES IN INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES: A PROPOSAL REQUIRING A REASONABLE POSSIBILITY OF SUCCESS ON THE UNDERLYING MERITS", 33 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 605 (2005)
- "Aerojet-General Corporation v. American Arbitration Association, 478 F.2d 248, 251 (9th Cir. 1973)", ~ (1973)
- "AT & T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643", ~ (1986)
- "Automated Waste Disposal, Inc. v. Mid-Hudson Waste, Inc. 50 A.D.3d 1072", ~ (2008)
- "Banco de Seguros del Estado v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc., 344 F.3d 255", ~ (2003)
- "Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 126 S.Ct. 1204", ~ (2006)
- "Caulfield v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, 583 F.2d 605", ~ (1978)
- "Cavanaugh v. McDonnell & Co., 357 Mass., 452, 457, 258 N.E.2d 561 (Mass. 1970)", ~ (1970)
- "Chastain v. Robinson-Humphrey Co, Inc., 957 F.2d 851, 855 (11th Cir. 1992)", ~ (1992)
- "Daye Nonferrouse Metals Company v. Trafigura Beheer B.V., 1997 WL 375680", 5~ (1997)
- "Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency v. St. Joseph's Hospital, 81 A.D.2d 403", ~ (1981)
- "First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938", ~ (1995)
- "Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308, 338", ~
- "Island Creek Coal Sales Co. v. City of Gainesville, Fla., 729 F.2d 1046, 1049 C.A", ~ (1984)
- "Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., 596 F.2d 70 (C.A. 1979)", ~ (1979)
- "Lyons Hollis Associates, Inc. v. New Technology Partners, Inc., 278 F.Supp.2d 236", ~ (2003)
- "Merrill Lynch v. Salvano, 999 F.2d 211, 211 (7th Cir. 1993)", ~ (1993)
- "Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. DeCaro, 577 F.Supp. 616", ~ (1983)
- "Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hovey, 726 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1984)", ~ (1984)
- "Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Patinkin, 1991 WL 83163", ~ (1991)
- "Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Salvano, 999 F.2d 211 C.A.7 (Ill.)", ~ (1993)
- "Newbridge Acquisition I, L.L.C. v. Grupo Corvi, S.A. de D.V., 2003 WL 42007 (S.D.N.Y.,2003)", ~ (2003)
- "Prima Paint Corp. v Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Co. 388 U.S. 395", ~ (1967)
- "Salvucci v. Sheehan, 212 N.E.2d 243, Mass", ~ (1965)
- "Sandvik AB v. Advent Int'l Corp., 220 F.3d 99 (3rd Cir. 2000)", ~ (2000)
- "Shearman Lehman Brothers v. Crisp, 646 So.2d 613 (S.C. Ala. 1994)", ~ (1994)
- "Sphere Drake Insurance Limited v. Clarendon National Insurance Company, 263 F.3d 26, 32 (2nd Cir. 2001)", ~ (2001)
- "Three Valleys Municipal Water District v. E.F. Hutton, 925 F.2d 1136 (9th Cir. 1991)", ~ (1991)
- "Triebwasser & Katz v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 535 F.2d 1356", ~ (1976)
- "9 U.S.C.A", ~
- "American Arbitration Association Commercial Arbitration Rules", ~
- "ARBITRAL AWARDS", ~
- "California International Commercial Arbitration and Conciliation Act", ~
- "ICC Rules for Pre-Arbitral Referee Procedure", ~
- "New York Civil Practice Law and Rules", ~
- "NY CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN R. UNCITRAL 모델중재법", ~
- "REVISED UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT", ~ (2000)
- "U.S.C.A. Const. Art. VI cl. 2", ~
- "Unif. Arbitration Act", ~ (2000)
- "구 UNCITRAL 모델중재법", ~
- "American Arbitration Association Commercial Arbitration Rules"[URL]
- "ICC"[URL]
- "UNCITRAL"[URL]
