Identifying Effective Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Intellectual Property Disputes in the International Context
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper addresses the question of what kinds of dispute resolution choices can effectively handle complex intellectual property disputes, given the rising importance of IP, the increasing frequency and complexity of IP disputes, and the lack of research on dispute resolution strategies. For this analysis, the study adopted the analytic hierarchy process approach, which covers complex, multi-criteria decision problems, to quantify the expert’s judgments on IP dispute resolution choice. Its results show that the effectiveness of resolution methods differs, depending on the type of IP dispute classified into seven issues, which are (i) requirement for validity of IP right, (ii) range and duration of IP right, (iii) transfer of IP right, (iv) licensing, (v) use of IP right, (vi) declaration of IP infringement, and (vii) estimation of damage. The disputes over IPR ownership and IP infringement remain challenging issues in due to strong requirement of the cross-border enforcement. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR), especially arbitration, is determined to be a more effective method to deal with international IP disputes, but various advanced types of ADR techniques should be further developed to deal with the increasing complexity of IP disputes.
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of what kinds of dispute resolution choices can effectively handle complex intellectual property disputes, given the rising importance of IP, the increasing frequency and complexity of IP disputes, and the lack of research on dispute resolution strategies. For this analysis, the study adopted the analytic hierarchy process approach, which covers complex, multi-criteria decision problems, to quantify the expert’s judgments on IP dispute resolution choice. Its results show that the effectiveness of resolution methods differs, depending on the type of IP dispute classified into seven issues, which are (i) requirement for validity of IP right, (ii) range and duration of IP right, (iii) transfer of IP right, (iv) licensing, (v) use of IP right, (vi) declaration of IP infringement, and (vii) estimation of damage. The disputes over IPR ownership and IP infringement remain challenging issues in due to strong requirement of the cross-border enforcement. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR), especially arbitration, is determined to be a more effective method to deal with international IP disputes, but various advanced types of ADR techniques should be further developed to deal with the increasing complexity of IP disputes.
참고문헌 (50)
- Albayrakoglu, M.M, "Justification of New Manufacturing Technology: A Strategic Approach Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process", Production and Inventory Management Journal, 37(1), pp.71~76 (1996)
- Ansson Jr., R.J, "International intellectual property rights, the United States, and the People's Republic of China", Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 13, pp.1~26 (1999)
- Arnold, T, "Managing patent disputes through arbitration", Arbitration Journal, 46(3), pp.1~5 (1991)
- Bernstein, D, "A case for mediating trademark disputes in the age of expanding brands", Cardozo Journal of Dispute Resolution, 6(2,), pp.139~162 (2005)
- Barney, J.B, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99~120 (1991)
- Barsky, N.P, "The most valuable resource - measuring and managing intellectual capital", Strategic Finance, 81(8), pp.58~62 (2000)
- Chesbrough, H, "The era of open innovation", MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), pp.35~41 (2003)
- Delerue, H, "Managerial secrecy and intellectual asset protection in SMEs:the role of institutional environment", Journal of International Management, 17(2), pp.130~142 (2011)
- Delios, A, "Survival and profitability: the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance", Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), pp.1028~1038 (2001)
- Fainshmidt, S, "Legal Distance, Cognitive Distance, and Coflict Resolution in International Business Intellectual Property Disputes", Journal of International Management, 20(2), pp.188~200 (2014)
- Falkner, C. H, "Multi-Attribute Decision Models in the Justification of CIM Systems", The Engineering Economist, 35(2), pp.91~114 (1990)
- Fey, C.F, "Joint venture conflict: the case of Russian international joint ventures", International Business Review, 9(2), pp.139~162 (2000)
- Folsom, R.H, "International Business Transactions: A Problem Oriented Coursebook" (2002), West Group Publishing
- Forman, E, "The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition", OperationsResearch, 49(4), pp.469~486 (2001)
- Grantham, W, "The Arbitrability of International Intellectual Property Disputes", Berkeley Journal of International Law, 14(1), pp.175~221 (1996)
- Hanel, P, "Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature", Technovation, 26(8), pp.895~931 (2008)
- Ho, W, "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications. A literature review", European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), pp.211~228 (2008)
- Jabaly, P, "IP litigation or ADR", Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 5(10), pp.730~735 (2010)
- Kamiyama, S, "Valuation and Exploitation of Intellectual Property" (2006)[DOI]
- Kumar, S, "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications", European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), pp.1~29 (2006)
- 이주연, "국제 지식재산권 분쟁해결을 위한 중재의 활성화 방안 - 국내 ADR 기관의 발전방안을 중심으로-", 중재연구, 23(2), pp.165~190 (2013), 한국중재학회
- Lee, S, "Using AHP to determine intangible priority factors for technology transfer adoption", Expert Systems with Applications, 39(7), pp.6388~6395 (2012)
- Levine, R. E, "Using alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve patent disputes", Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 7(2), pp.119~125 (2012)
- Lewicki, R.J, "Essentials of Negotiation" (2004), McGraw-Hill Publishing
- Liberatore, M, "The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review", European Journal of Operational Research, 18(1), pp.194~207 (2008)
- LoVoi, J, "Competing interests: anti-piracy efforts triumph under TRIPS but new copying technology undermines success", Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 25, pp.445~482 (1999)
- Martin, J, "Arbitrating in the Alps rather than litigating in Los Angeles: The advantages of international intellectual property-specific alternative dispute resolution", Stanford Law Review, 49(4), pp.917~970 (1997)
- Mattli, W, "Private justice in a global economy: from litigation to arbitration", International Organization, 55(4), pp.919~947 (2001)
- Mattli, W, "Law and politics in the European Union: A reply to Garrett", International Organization, 49(1), pp.183~190 (1995)
- McConnaughay, P, "ADR of Intellectual Property Disputes", SOFTIC SYMPOSIUM, 1 (2002)
- Nixon, A, "Arbitration – a better way to resolve intellectual-property disputes?", Trends in Biotechnology, 15(12), pp.484~486 (1997)
- Omkarprasad, V, "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications", European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), pp.1~29 (2006)
- Riahi-Belkaoui, A, "Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: a study of the resource-based and stakeholder views", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), pp.215~226 (2003)
- Satty, T. L, "Multi-criteria Decision Making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh" (1988), RWS Publications
- Saaty, T.L, "Decision Making for Leaders" (1995), RWS Publication
- Satty, T.L, "Model, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process" (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Schimmel, D, "Resolving international intellectual property disputes in arbitration", Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 21(2), pp.1~6 (2009)
- Smith, M, "Mediation as an alternative to litigation in patent infringement disputes", ADR Bulletin, 11(6), pp.113~119 (2009)
- 손경한, "지적재산의 국제적 분쟁해결합의", 중재연구, 14(2), pp.199~241 (2004), 한국중재학회
- Taylor III, B. W, "Management Science" (2002), Pearson Prentice-Hall, Inc
- Terpstra, V, "Global Environment of Business" (2005), North coast Publishers
- Tiefenbrun, S, "Piracy of intellectual property in China and the former Soviet Union and its effects upon international trade: a comparison", Buffalo Law Review, 46, pp.1~69 (1998)
- Tjosvold, D, "The conflict-positive organization: it depends upon us", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), pp.19~28 (2008)
- Tsang, E. W. K, "Motives for strategic alliance: A resource-based perspective. Scandinavian", Journal of Management, 14(3), pp.207~221 (1998)
- Yang, J, "An AHP Decision Model for Facility Location Selection", Facilities, 15(9), pp.241~254 (1997)
- Yanga, J, "Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process in Firm's Overall Performance Evaluation: A Case Study in China", Interational Journal of Business, 7(1), pp.29~46 (2002)
- 윤선희, "ADR에서의 지적재산권분쟁", 중재연구, 13(1), pp.125~167 (2003), 한국중재학회
- Wang, C.L, "Conflict handling styles in international joint ventures: a cross-cultural and cross-national comparison", Management International Review, 45(1), pp.3~21 (2005)
- Wilson, M, "TRIPS agreement implications for ASEAN protection of computer technology", Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law, 4, pp.18~55 (1997)
- WIPO, "Introduction to intellectual property: Theory and practice, London: Kluwer Law International" (1997), Kluwer Law International, the World Intellectual Property Organization