A Study on the Development of the Arbitration System based on the Prosecution and Police Investigation Mediation Right
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of the arbitration system, such as the establishment of the arbitration industry and expanding the scope of arbitration fields. The solution method of arbitration differs greatly from that of the court's trial process. This can be seen in the way of autonomous conflict resolution. Therefore, the role of arbitrator is a very important function. In this sense, it seems necessary to establish a professional arbitrator system. Now the Arbitration Promotion Act has been enacted and interest in the arbitration industry is also rising. It is necessary to deal effectively with new incidents according to changes in the legal environment internationally. In order to do this, it is imperative to train professional arbitrators. A training plan for arbitration manager to assist this is now under consideration. The coming of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) technology will simply stop the uniform way of determining winners by lawsuits. Even in new companies entering new markets as well as overseas companies, assistance from arbitration experts is indispensable in order to effectively deal with international trade disputes that will develop in the future. In addition to fostering the arbitration industry, it is necessary to train experts in domestic and foreign arbitration and arbitration practitioners to provide high-quality legal services. For these human resource development measures, we will explore the subject and procedural methods. The Arbitrators Association should concentrate on these matters and be cautious when focusing on the training of arbitrators and arbitration managers through the selection process. The Arbitrators Association must strengthen the level of new education (designation / consignment). Measures must be taken in order to grant such procedures as well as subsequent steps.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of the arbitration system, such as the establishment of the arbitration industry and expanding the scope of arbitration fields. The solution method of arbitration differs greatly from that of the court's trial process. This can be seen in the way of autonomous conflict resolution. Therefore, the role of arbitrator is a very important function. In this sense, it seems necessary to establish a professional arbitrator system. Now the Arbitration Promotion Act has been enacted and interest in the arbitration industry is also rising. It is necessary to deal effectively with new incidents according to changes in the legal environment internationally. In order to do this, it is imperative to train professional arbitrators. A training plan for arbitration manager to assist this is now under consideration. The coming of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) technology will simply stop the uniform way of determining winners by lawsuits. Even in new companies entering new markets as well as overseas companies, assistance from arbitration experts is indispensable in order to effectively deal with international trade disputes that will develop in the future. In addition to fostering the arbitration industry, it is necessary to train experts in domestic and foreign arbitration and arbitration practitioners to provide high-quality legal services. For these human resource development measures, we will explore the subject and procedural methods. The Arbitrators Association should concentrate on these matters and be cautious when focusing on the training of arbitrators and arbitration managers through the selection process. The Arbitrators Association must strengthen the level of new education (designation / consignment). Measures must be taken in order to grant such procedures as well as subsequent steps.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강수미, "중재판정의 효력에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 27(1), pp.59~84 (2017), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 강수미, "미국에서의 중재인의 권한판단권한(Competence-Competence)에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 22(2), pp.53~77 (2012), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 김도훈, "캐나다 브리티시 컬럼비아 주 민사분쟁해결심판소법에 관한 연구", 법학논집, 19(3), pp.93~119 (2015), 법학연구소
- 김영주, "중재인의 근로자성과 자격요건 - 영국 대법원의 2011년 Jivraj v Hashwani 판결을 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 26(1), pp.29~51 (2016), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 김용길, "중재합의의 효력범위에 관한 고찰 - 대법원 2011.12.22. 선고 2010다76573 판결을 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 23(2), pp.1~35 (2013), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 김용길, "우리나라에서 외국중재판정의 승인과 집행에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 20(3), pp.3~24 (2010), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 남선모, "한국중재의 분야별 확산에 관한 검토 - 형사중재의 도입을 중심으로 -", 중재연구, 22(3), pp.1~23 (2012), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 신군재, "한․중․미 중재인의 선정 및 기피에 관한 비교연구", 중재연구, 21(1), pp.183~214 (2011), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 신승남, "미국법 상의 중재인의 고지 의무: 판례법상 명백한 편파성을 중심으로", 중재연구, 26(2), pp.45~66 (2016), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 안건형, "비변호사 중재인 활용의 문제점과 개선방안", 중재연구, 25(1), pp.47~64 (2015), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 양영식, "블록체인 스마트계약의 상용화 대비를 위한 법적 과제", 법학연구, 18(2), pp.105~130 (2018), 한국법학회
- 홍석모, "국제중재에서 변호사의 비윤리적 행위 규제에 대한 연구", 중재연구, 25(2), pp.3~17 (2015), 한국중재학회[DOI]
- 8674, "ch-db.tistory.com", pp.8674
