본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Estrategia Clientelar de Compra de Voto y Niveles de Marginación: Evidencia para el Caso de un Municipio de México

Clientelistic Strategy of Vote Buying and Levels of Marginalization: Evidence from a Case of a Mexican Municipality

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

The analysis focuses on the effect of voter poverty levels (measured through approximation by the level of marginality of the area where they live), in relation to the probability of receiving an offer from a broker or political party in the manner of a clientelistic exchange (the trade of votes for goods or other favors). The association is usually an important assumption in research about clientelism and in its theoretical approaches, however, it has been scarcely studied empirically. The analysis was carried out using a post-electoral survey in a municipality of the urban area of Jalisco, Mexico. The results support the assertion that marginalization level is an important predictor of the clientelistic supply.

Abstract

The analysis focuses on the effect of voter poverty levels (measured through approximation by the level of marginality of the area where they live), in relation to the probability of receiving an offer from a broker or political party in the manner of a clientelistic exchange (the trade of votes for goods or other favors). The association is usually an important assumption in research about clientelism and in its theoretical approaches, however, it has been scarcely studied empirically. The analysis was carried out using a post-electoral survey in a municipality of the urban area of Jalisco, Mexico. The results support the assertion that marginalization level is an important predictor of the clientelistic supply.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Ansolabehere, S., "Party Control of State Government and the Distribution of Public Expenditures", Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(4), pp.547~569 (2006)
  2. Aparicio, R., "El perfil del votante clientelar en México durante las elecciones de 2000", Estudios sociológicos, 23(68), pp.375~396 (2005)
  3. Auyero, J., "Poor People’s Politics" (2000), Duke University Press
  4. Auyero, J., "Poor People’s Lives and Politics: The Things a Political Ethnographer Knows (and doesn’t Know) after 15 Years of Fieldwork", New Perspectives on Turkey, 46, pp.95~127 (2012)
  5. Calvo, E., "Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in Argentine Electoral Market", American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), pp.742~757 (2004)
  6. Case, A., "Election Goals and Income Redistribution: Recent Evidence from Albania", European Economic Review, 45, pp.405~423 (2001)
  7. Cornelius, W., "La eficiencia de la compra y coacción del voto en las elecciones mexicanas de 2000", Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 20, pp.11~31 (2002)
  8. Cox, G., "Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game", Journal of Politics, 48, pp.370~389 (1986)
  9. Dixit, A., "Redistributive Politics and Economic Efficiency", American Journal of Political Science, 89, pp.856~866 (1995)
  10. Hernández, E., "El clientelismo en México: los usos políticos de la pobreza", Espacios públicos, pp.118~140 (2006)
  11. Hevia, F., "Uso político de programas sociales y nuevos intermediarios institucionales: el Programa Progresa", Oportunidades en el sur de Veracruz, 2010, 119~132
  12. Hevia, F., "Relaciones Sociedad-Estado, participación ciudadana y clientelismo político en programas contra la pobreza. El caso de Bolsa Familia en Brasil", América Latina Hoy, pp.205~238 (2011)
  13. Lindbeck, A., "Balanced Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition", Public Choice, 52, pp.273~297 (1987)
  14. Magaloni, B., "Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  15. Magaloni, B., "Patrons Clients and Policies" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  16. Palma, E., "Problemas para la construcción de ciudadanía: un análisis de los beneficiarios del programa de Oportunidades", PNUD México Serie ENAPP, ~ (2007)
  17. Peroni, A., "Implementación de la política social: espacio de intermediación clientelar. Análisis de caso, La Plata, Argentina", Revista de Sociología, pp.89~116 (2016)
  18. Piattoni Simona, "Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation", pp.1~30 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  19. Schedler, A., "‘El voto es nuestro’: Cómo los ciudadanos mexicanos perciben el clientelismo electoral", Revista Mexicana de Sociología, pp.57~97 (2004)
  20. Schröter, Bárbara, "Clientelismo Político: existe el fantasma y cómo se viste?", Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 72(1), pp.141~175 (2010)
  21. Stokes, "The Puzzle of Distributive Politics" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  22. Tapia, C., "Determinantes de la demanda clientelar en México: un análisis de la identidad del ‘cliente’ en procesos electorales recientes", Estudios Sociológicos, 34(102), pp.503~535 (2016)
  23. Vilalta Carlos, "Compra y coacción del voto en México: variaciones estatales y diferencias de opinión entre beneficiarios y no beneficiarios de programas sociales", PNUD México Serie ENAPP, ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)