국제상사중재판정의 준거법선택에 있어서 당사자자치의 원칙- 당사자에 의한 lex mercatoria의 선택과 준거법 분할지정의 가능여부를 중심으로 -
The Party’s Autonomy Principle on the Choice of the Applicable law to International Commercial Arbitral Awards - Focus on the Choice of the Lex Rercatoria and the Possibility of Dépeçage by the Party -
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Currently, it is the general trend that the party’s autonomy principle is applicable in determining the applicable law for the international private law and the international commercial arbitration. The purpose of this article is to make research on the party's autonomy principle for the international commercial arbitral awards. For this purpose ist to analyse regal issue the applicability of the lex mercatoria and the possibility of dépeçage relating to the party autonomy. In this Article ist dealt with Art. 29 para. 1 of the Korean Arbitration Act in comparison with Art. 28 para. 1 UNCITRAL Model Law and Art. 1051 para. 1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure. The Art. 28 para. 1 UNCITRAL Model Law and Art. 1051 para. 1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure provides equally. "The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordence with such 'rules of law' as chosen by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute. Any designation of the law or legal system of a given State shall be construed, unless otherwise expressed, as directly referring to the substantive law of that State and not to its conflict of laws rules." The term 'rule of law' used to describe the applicability of the lex mercatoria and the possibility dépeçage. Unlike Art. 28 para. 1 UNCITRAL Model Law and Art. 1051 para.1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure. Act, Art. 29(1) of the Korean Arbitration Act provides that the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordence with the 'law' chosen by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute. However the majority view in Korea takes the position that the term 'law' should be interpreted broadly so as to encompass 'rules of law' at UNCITRAL Model Law and the German Code of Civil Procedure.
Abstract
Currently, it is the general trend that the party’s autonomy principle is applicable in determining the applicable law for the international private law and the international commercial arbitration. The purpose of this article is to make research on the party's autonomy principle for the international commercial arbitral awards. For this purpose ist to analyse regal issue the applicability of the lex mercatoria and the possibility of dépeçage relating to the party autonomy. In this Article ist dealt with Art. 29 para. 1 of the Korean Arbitration Act in comparison with Art. 28 para. 1 UNCITRAL Model Law and Art. 1051 para. 1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure. The Art. 28 para. 1 UNCITRAL Model Law and Art. 1051 para. 1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure provides equally. "The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordence with such 'rules of law' as chosen by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute. Any designation of the law or legal system of a given State shall be construed, unless otherwise expressed, as directly referring to the substantive law of that State and not to its conflict of laws rules." The term 'rule of law' used to describe the applicability of the lex mercatoria and the possibility dépeçage. Unlike Art. 28 para. 1 UNCITRAL Model Law and Art. 1051 para.1 of the German Code of Civil Procedure. Act, Art. 29(1) of the Korean Arbitration Act provides that the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordence with the 'law' chosen by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute. However the majority view in Korea takes the position that the term 'law' should be interpreted broadly so as to encompass 'rules of law' at UNCITRAL Model Law and the German Code of Civil Procedure.
참고문헌 (24)
- 법무부, "국제사법해설" (2001), 법무부 국제법무과
- 석광현, "개정중재법의 몇 가지 문제점", 2 (2002), 박영사
- "국제사법의 준거법에 관한 몇 가지 논점", 1 (2002), 박영사
- 윤종진, "국제상사중재법론" (1997), 한올출판사
- 이강빈, "국제중재에 있어서 중재합의의 준거법결정에 관한 연구", 15(2) (2005), 한국중재학회
- 이호원, "개정중재법에 관한 소고", (302) (2001), 대한상사중재원
- 장문철, "개정중재법 해설" (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 장문철, "국제사법총론" (1996), 홍문사
- 하용득, "중재법의 개정경과 및 주요내용", (295) (2000), 대한상사중재원
- von Bar, Christian, "Internationales Privatrecht" (2003)
- Berger, Klaus Peter, "Das neue deutsche Schiedsverfahrensrech" (1998)
- Der Fall, "Lex Mercatoria in der internationalen Wirtschaftsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit"
- Boele-Woelki, Katharina, "Die Anwendung der UNIDROIT-Principles auf internationale Handelsvertrge" (1997)
- Felix, "Internationale Schiedsgerichte und Lex Mercatoria" (1989)
- von Hoffmann, Bernd, "Internationales Privatrecht" (2002)
- Junker, Abbo, "Neuere Entwicklungen im Internationalen Privatrecht" (1998)
- Herbert, "Internationale Schiedsverfahren nach der Reform"
- Lachmann, Jens-Peter, "Handbuch fr die Schiedsgerichtspraxis" (1998)
- Lando, Ole, "The Principles of European Contract law(Part I：Performance, Non Performance and Redemies)" (1995)
- "Die objektive Anknpfung von Vertrgen nach § 1051 Abs. 2 ZPO" (2000)
- Schwab, Karl-Heinz, "Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit(Kommentar)" (2000)
- Schmitthoff, "Clive M. Export Trade：The Law and Practice of International Trade" (1990), 9th ed.
- Solomon, Dennis, "Das vom Schiedsgericht in der Sache anzuwendende Recht nach dem Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Neuregelung des Schiedsverfahrensrecht" (1997)
- Wichard, Christian, "Die Anwendung der UNIDROIT-Prinzipien fr internationale Handelsvertrge durch Schiedsgerichte und staatliche Gerichte" (1996)