본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

CISG적용 국제물품매매에서 국내 강행법분쟁에 관한 연구- 물품불일치 분쟁사건 판례를 중심으로 -

Disputes on the Application of National Compulsory Law in International Sale of Goods under CISG - with a special reference to Case Law for Non-compliance -

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

Abstract

This paper deals with disputes incurred from the CISG provisions in relation with the conformity of goods with a view to finding the general way of approach made by the court and arbitration tribunal in the case laws for the interpretation of CISG based on 6(six) cases thereon. Throughout this study, it has been noted that the German Supreme Court devoted most in creating the general principle of CISG interpretation in relation with national compulsory law of regulation applicable on the conformity of goods. It was New Zealand mussels case in which the German supreme court decided that the exporting country's compulsory law of regulation would be applied in determining the conformity of goods. Furthermore, German supreme court added that CISG does not place an obligation on the exporter to supply goods, which conform to all statutory or other public provisions in force in the import state unless the same provisions exist in the export State as well, or the importer informed the exporter about such provisions existing in the import state, or the exporter had knowledge of the provisions due to special circumstances. It is stipulated in CISG that the goods conform with contract if they are fit for the purpose for which goods of the same description would ordinarily be used. When questions arise concerning matters governed by the CISG that are not expressly defined in the CISG, the question is to be settled in conformity with general principles on which the convention is based. Only when such a general principle cannot be found may the tribunal turn to other sources such as UNIDROIT Principles, Principles of European Contract Law and Lex Mercatoria, etc. Interpretation of CISG should be autonomous, in the sense that it should not depend on principles and concepts derived from any national legal system. Even where a CISG rule is directly inspired by domestic law, the court should not fall back on its domestic law, but interpret the rule by reference to the CISG with a view to its international character and to the need to promote uniformity in its application and the observance of good faith in international trade.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 석광현, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 국제연합협약(CISG)상의 본질적 계약위반", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.437~480 (2006), 법학연구소
  2. Audit,Bernard, "The Vienna Sales Convention and the Lex Mercatoria" (1998), Juris Publishing
  3. Bonell, Michael Joachim, "The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and CISG - Alternatives or Complementary Instruments?", Uniform Law Review, (26) (1996)
  4. Brodermann, Eckart, "The Practice of Excluding the CISG: time for change? Comment on the limited use of the CISG in private practice (and on why this will increasingly change), Modern Law for Global Commerce, Congress to celebrate the fortieth annual session of UNICITRAL", Vienna, 9(12) (2007)
  5. Farnsworth,E.Allan, "Review of Standard Forms or Terms under the Vienna Convention", Cornell International Law Journal, 21 (1988)
  6. Hartwig, Jeffrey R., "Schmitz-Werke & Co. v. Rockland Industries Inc. and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG): Diffidence and developing International Legal Norms", Journal of Law and Commerce, 22 (2003)
  7. Hellner,Jan, "Gap-filling by Analogy: Art. 7 of the UN Sales Convention in its Historical Context in Studies in International Law", Festskrift til Lars Hjerner, Stockholm, 1990, ~ (1990)
  8. Honnold, John O., "Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 UN Convention" (1991), Kluwer
  9. Lando, Ole, "The CISG, the Uidroit Principles and the Principles of European Contract Law in a Global Commercial Code", undated, ~
  10. Posch, Willigald, "Austrian Cases on the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", indohona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration, 6 (2002)
  11. http:, , cisgw3.law.pace.edu, 950308g
  12. http:, , www.cisg.law.pace.edu, biblio, pp.*

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)