신용장거래에서 연지급확약할인의 유효성에 관한 연구 -사기의 원칙 적용을 중심으로-
Analysis on Validity of Discounting the Deferred Payment Undertaking under Documentary Credit Transactions - with a Special Reference to the Application of Fraud Rule -
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to analyze the legality in which the fraud rule allow the issuer of L/C or a court to disrupt the payment to the beneficiary under the deferred payment credit when the nominated bank for deferred payment undertaking made prepayment or negotiation before the maturity date and fraud is identified to be involved. Since the function of commercial L/C is to provide absolute assurance of payment to a beneficiary, the fraud rule based on fraud exception has been known as the negative factor which lead to the disruption of "principle of independence & abstraction" under the commercial L/C transactions. As a result, the fraud rule is necessary to limit the activities of fraudsters, but its scope must be carefully circumscribed so as not to deny commercial utility to an instrument that exists to serve as an assurance of payment. But the fraud itself has not been firmly established because it is inherently pliable in its concept. There are numerous contents to describe the application of fraud to the L/C transactions as a standard such as egregious fraud, intentional fraud, L/C fraud(omitted here), flexible fraud, and constructive fraud. And so the standard applicable to the commercial transaction as the fraud rule would be high or low depending upon the various standards of fraud.
Abstract
This paper is to analyze the legality in which the fraud rule allow the issuer of L/C or a court to disrupt the payment to the beneficiary under the deferred payment credit when the nominated bank for deferred payment undertaking made prepayment or negotiation before the maturity date and fraud is identified to be involved. Since the function of commercial L/C is to provide absolute assurance of payment to a beneficiary, the fraud rule based on fraud exception has been known as the negative factor which lead to the disruption of "principle of independence & abstraction" under the commercial L/C transactions. As a result, the fraud rule is necessary to limit the activities of fraudsters, but its scope must be carefully circumscribed so as not to deny commercial utility to an instrument that exists to serve as an assurance of payment. But the fraud itself has not been firmly established because it is inherently pliable in its concept. There are numerous contents to describe the application of fraud to the L/C transactions as a standard such as egregious fraud, intentional fraud, L/C fraud(omitted here), flexible fraud, and constructive fraud. And so the standard applicable to the commercial transaction as the fraud rule would be high or low depending upon the various standards of fraud.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강원진, "신용장거래에서 사기 및 서류위조에 따른 지급이행과 지급거절에 관한 고찰", 무역상무연구, 49, pp.139~164 (2011), 한국무역상무학회
- 이제현, "양도가능신용장거래의 물품하자담보책임에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 27(1), pp.25~48 (2002), 한국무역학회
- 이종원, "신용장의 독립성의 원칙의 예외로서의 사기원칙에 관한 고찰", 무역상무연구, 34, pp.55~74 (2007), 한국무역상무학회
- 정찬형, "信用狀去來에 있어서 Fraud Rule", 고려법학, (49), pp.61~92 (2007), 법학연구원
- 최해범, "신용장거래에 있어서 Fraud Rule의 적용범위에 관한 연구", 관세학회지, 10(1), pp.255~282 (2009), 한국관세학회
- 한재필, "화환신용장 거래에서 은행의 불일치서류 거절의 적시성에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.161~189 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 한재필, "UCP 600에서의 서류심사표준에 관한 연구 -UCP 500의 관련규정과 비교하여", 국제상학, 22(2), pp.107~125 (2007), 한국국제상학회
- 한재필, "연지급확약의 할인에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 32(1), pp.211~240 (2007), 한국무역학회
- 한재필, "UCP 600을 위한 주요개정내용에 관한 연구 -2005. 11월 1차개정완결초안을 중심으로", 국제상학, 21(2), pp.45~65 (2006), 한국국제상학회
- 한재필, "한주섭 교수 원저 최신 화환신용장론" (2009), 도서출판 두남
- 한주섭, "신용장거래에서의 사기의 원칙에 관한 연구", 국제상학, 15(1) (2000), 한국국제상학회
- Barnes, James G., "A US Views: US Codified law is superior to English judgement law on the fraud exception to the independent of letter of credit", Contrasting UK and US, 6(3) (2000)
- Bertrams, R., "Bank Guarantees in International Trade, 3rd ed" (2004), Kluwer Law International
- Buckley, Ross P., "The 1993 Revision of the UCP", Journal of Banking and Financial Law and Practice, 6 (1995)
- Byrne, James E., "Negotiation in Letter of Credit Practice and Law: The Evolution of the Doctrine", Texas International Law Journal (2007)
- Dolan, John F, "The Law of Letters of Credit: Commercial and Standby Credits, 2nd ed" (1991), Warren, Gorham & Lamont
- Jack, Raymond, "Documentary Credits" (2001)
- King, R, "The Law of Bankers' Commercial Credits 8th ed" (2001)
- Langerich, Reinhard, "Should We Trust a Bankers Commitment Given under a Documentary Credit", Documentary Credit World, ~ (1999)
- Margaret L, "Moses of Counsel", Connell Folly Attorney at Law, ~
- Rowe,Michael, "Letter of Credit" (1985), Euromoney
- Tolhurst, "Greg The Assignment of Contractual Rights" (2006), Hart Publishing
- Turner,Paul S, "Revised UCC Article 5: The New U.S. Uniform Law on Letters of Credit", Banking & Financial Law Review (1996)
- Xiang, Gao, "A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law", Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law (2003)
- Xiang Gao, "Presenters Immune from the Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Cedit", LMCLQ, 10 (2002)
- John F. Dolan, "The Law of Letters of Credit: Commercial and Standby Credits, 2nd ed", Warren, Gorham & Lamont