Preventing Disputes under Free Trade Agreements with Advance Ruling System
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to explore ways to prevent disputes arising from ‘Origin Procedure’ under FTAs through 'advance ruling system'. To achieve the aims of this article, this paper examines advance ruling systems operated by Korea and the United States to implement the Korea-US FTA, and analyzes whether the systems are realizing the original purpose of preventing disputes in terms of legal certainty and accessibility. The results show that the advance ruling system for origin in Korea has the same high level of laws and institutions as that of the United States. However, it is necessary to further provide institutional support for staffs that operate the system, so that expertise knowledge can be consolidated and accumulated. Also the accessibility of the system requires improvements.
Abstract
This article aims to explore ways to prevent disputes arising from ‘Origin Procedure’ under FTAs through 'advance ruling system'. To achieve the aims of this article, this paper examines advance ruling systems operated by Korea and the United States to implement the Korea-US FTA, and analyzes whether the systems are realizing the original purpose of preventing disputes in terms of legal certainty and accessibility. The results show that the advance ruling system for origin in Korea has the same high level of laws and institutions as that of the United States. However, it is necessary to further provide institutional support for staffs that operate the system, so that expertise knowledge can be consolidated and accumulated. Also the accessibility of the system requires improvements.
참고문헌 (19)
- 안태건, "한미 FTA 발효 후 무역구조 변화에 대한 분석", 통상정보연구, 20(1), pp.25~46 (2018), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
- US Trade Policy: The Infatuation with FTAs, "Bhagwati, J.", ~, pp.Discussion Paper Series No. 726 (1995)
- Chen, S. -C., "In the Name of Legal Certainty? Comparison of Advance Ruling for Tariff Classification Systems in the European Union, China and Taiwan", World Customs Journal, 10(2), pp.47~64 (2016)[DOI]
- Estevadeordal, A, "Multilateralzing Preferential Rules of Origin around the World", HEI, SECO, NCCR Conference (2007)
- "미 신행정부 무역정책 기조와 통관환경 변화" (2017)[URL]
- 김구태, "품목분류 사전심사제도의 적용과 한계에 관한 사례 연구", 무역통상학회지, 15(3), pp.295~321 (2015), 한국무역통상학회
- "Trade Statistics Portal" (2019)[URL]
- "한미 FTA 재협정 타결의 파급효과와 통상정책 방향" (2018)[URL]
- Lee, Sangyup, "Customs Study (Vol. 14)" (2014), Seoul
- Act on Special Cases of the Customs Act for the Implementation of Free Trade Agreements, "Ministry of Economy and Finance", ~ (2016)
- Customs Act, "Ministry of Economy and Finance", ~ (2019)
- FTA체결 상대국 품목분류 ( HS ) 사전심사제도 운영 현황, "Ministry of Trade, Industry, and E", ~ (2014)
- "Protocol Between the Government of The Republic of Korea And the Government of United States of America Amending the Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America" (2018)[URL]
- Enforcement Decree of the Act on Special Cases of the Customs Act for the Implementation of Free Trade Agreements, "Presidential Decree", ~, pp.Pub. L. No. 28836 (2018)
- Best Practices in Application of Advance Rulings by United States, "UNECE", UNECE, ~ (2012)
- "Advance Rulings" (2012)[URL]
- Yi, J., "Rules of origin and the use of free trade agreements: a literature review", The World Customs Journal, 9 (2015)
- 이지수, "A Study on the Dispute Settlement Procedure for the Preferential Rules of Origin", 중재연구, 26(3), pp.3~26 (2016), 한국중재학회[DOI]