본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Due Process, Confidentiality and Impartiality: A Study on Arbitration Principles in the Post-Pandemic Digital Environment

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

Two significant and somewhat unforeseen factors have impacted global progress in recent years: the rapid pace of digital advancements and the emergence of the pandemic. COVID-19 has accelerated the adoption of e-arbitration and digital characteristics in the field of arbitration, making them more frequently used for conducting arbitral proceedings. This study seeks to analyse the additional obstacles that have emerged during the pandemic and in post-pandemic times in the context of international arbitration, as well as the recommended remedies. The pandemic – in the era of digital technology – has both generated and intensified issues such as the utilisation of virtual guerilla tactics, the risks to cybersecurity, and the problems related to the obligation to disclose information. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how these problems have been addressed during and after the pandemic, including the already identified and potential future solutions. In order to do so, this study examines the impact of such features on three key concepts in arbitration proceedings: the principle of due process and the right to be heard, the confidentiality of arbitration proceedings, and the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator.

Abstract

Two significant and somewhat unforeseen factors have impacted global progress in recent years: the rapid pace of digital advancements and the emergence of the pandemic. COVID-19 has accelerated the adoption of e-arbitration and digital characteristics in the field of arbitration, making them more frequently used for conducting arbitral proceedings. This study seeks to analyse the additional obstacles that have emerged during the pandemic and in post-pandemic times in the context of international arbitration, as well as the recommended remedies. The pandemic – in the era of digital technology – has both generated and intensified issues such as the utilisation of virtual guerilla tactics, the risks to cybersecurity, and the problems related to the obligation to disclose information. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how these problems have been addressed during and after the pandemic, including the already identified and potential future solutions. In order to do so, this study examines the impact of such features on three key concepts in arbitration proceedings: the principle of due process and the right to be heard, the confidentiality of arbitration proceedings, and the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Ahuja, Navin G., "Taming the Guerrilla in International Commercial Arbitration: Levelling the Playing Field" (2022), Springer
  2. Andrews, Neil, "Andrews on Civil Processes, Arbitration and Mediation" (2017), Intersentia
  3. "Due Process and Procedural Irregularities" (2023)[URL]
  4. Berger, Klaus Peter, "Due process paranoia and the procedural judgment rule : a safe harbour for procedural management decisions by international arbitrators", Arbitration International, 32 (2016)
  5. "The rise of international arbitration and a comparison of arbitration procedures in the USA, England and Wales, Bermuda and Canada" (2022)[URL]
  6. "CIETAC Officially Launched Online Case Filing System on January 1, 2019" (2018)[URL]
  7. "Remote hearings and the use of technology in arbitration The Impact of Covid on International Disputes" (2023)[URL]
  8. Łągiewska, Magdalena, "International Arbitration in the Digital World", International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37, pp.821~827 (2024)
  9. Lalani, Shaheeza, "The Impact of Covid on International Disputes", ~ (2022)
  10. Markert, Lars, "Navigating the Digital Maze – Pertinent Issues in E-Arbitration", Journal of Arbitration Studies, 27(3) (2017)
  11. "Poncet disqualified from Iranian mega-case after “burkini” remarks" (2023)[URL]
  12. Piers, Maud, "Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration" (2018), Cambridge University Press
  13. Scherer, Maxi, "Remote Hearings in International Arbitration : An Analytical Framework", Journal of International Arbitration, 37(4) (2020)
  14. Scherer, Maxi, "International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution" (2020), Wolters Kluwer
  15. "It’s No Secret(?) – Two Recent Singapore Cases on Confidentiality in the Context of International Arbitrations" (2023)[URL]
  16. "What Are The Key Principles Of International Arbitration In Procurement?"[URL]
  17. Zamoff, Mitch, "Proposed Guidelines for Arbitral Disclosure of Social Media Activity", Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 23(1) (2021)
  18. "Press Release of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court" (2021)[URL]
  19. "IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (Adopted by resolution of the IBA Council on Thursday 23 October 2014)", ~ (2014)
  20. "IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (Approved by the IBA Council, 25 May 2024)" (2024)[URL]
  21. "IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration", ~ (2020)
  22. International Chamber of Commerce, "Arbitration Rules", ~ (2021)
  23. "Italian Code of Civil Procedure Seoul Protocol on Video Conferencing in International Arbitration", ~ (2020)
  24. "UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration" (1985)[URL]
  25. "UNCITRAL Secretariat Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", ~ (1958)
  26. "United Nations, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", ~ (1958)
  27. SGCA(I) 4,
  28. HKCFI 1558,
  29. HKCFI 2540,
  30. "World Anti-Doping Agency v. Mr Sun Yang & Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA), CAS 2019", A, ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)