The Influence of Feedback in the Simulated Patient Case-History Training among Audiology Students at the International Islamic University Malaysia
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives: There is a scant evidence on the use of simulations in audiology (especially in Malaysia) for case-history taking, although this technique is widely used for training medical and nursing students. Feedback is one of the important components in simulations training; however, it is unknown if feedback by instructors could influence the simulated patient (SP) training outcome for case-history taking among audiology students. Aim of the present study is to determine whether the SP training with feedback in addition to the standard role-play and seminar training is an effective learning tool for audiology case-history taking. Subjects and Methods: Twenty-six second-year undergraduate audiology students participated. A cross-over study design was used. All students initially attended two hours of seminar and role-play sessions. They were then divided into three types of training, 1) SP training (Group A), 2) SP with feedback (Group B), and 3) a non-additional training group (Group C). After two training sessions, the students changed their types of training to, 1) Group A and C: SP training with feedback, and 2) Group B: non-additional training. All the groups were assessed at three points: 1) pre-test, 2) intermediate, and 3) post-test. The normalized median score differences between and within the respective groups were analysed using non-parametric tests at 95% confidence intervals. Results: Groups with additional SP trainings (with and without feedback) showed a significantly higher normalized gain score than no training group (p<0.05). Conclusions: The SP training (with/ without feedback) is a beneficial learning tool for history taking to students in audiology major.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There is a scant evidence on the use of simulations in audiology (especially in Malaysia) for case-history taking, although this technique is widely used for training medical and nursing students. Feedback is one of the important components in simulations training; however, it is unknown if feedback by instructors could influence the simulated patient (SP) training outcome for case-history taking among audiology students. Aim of the present study is to determine whether the SP training with feedback in addition to the standard role-play and seminar training is an effective learning tool for audiology case-history taking. Subjects and Methods: Twenty-six second-year undergraduate audiology students participated. A cross-over study design was used. All students initially attended two hours of seminar and role-play sessions. They were then divided into three types of training, 1) SP training (Group A), 2) SP with feedback (Group B), and 3) a non-additional training group (Group C). After two training sessions, the students changed their types of training to, 1) Group A and C: SP training with feedback, and 2) Group B: non-additional training. All the groups were assessed at three points: 1) pre-test, 2) intermediate, and 3) post-test. The normalized median score differences between and within the respective groups were analysed using non-parametric tests at 95% confidence intervals. Results: Groups with additional SP trainings (with and without feedback) showed a significantly higher normalized gain score than no training group (p<0.05). Conclusions: The SP training (with/ without feedback) is a beneficial learning tool for history taking to students in audiology major.
참고문헌 (27)
- Goulious H, "Audiology education and practice from an international perspective", Int J Audiol, 47, pp.647~664 (2008)
- Bosse HM, "Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training:a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect", BMC Med Educ, 10, pp.27~ (2010)
- Hughes J, "A tool for assessing case history and feedback skills in audiology students working with simulated patients", Int J Audiol, 55, pp.765~774 (2016)
- Hughes J, "Simulated patients versus seminars to train case history and feedback skills in audiology students: a randomized controlled trial", Int J Audiol, 55, pp.758~764 (2016)
- Lane C, "Teaching motivational interviewing:using role play is as effective as using simulated patients", Med Educ, 42, pp.637~644 (2008)
- Grenness C, "Communication patterns in audiologic rehabilitation history-taking:audiologists, patients, and their companions", Ear Hear, 36, pp.191~204 (2015)
- Bays AM, "Interprofessional communication skills training for serious illness: evaluation of a small-group, simulated patient intervention", J Palliat Med, 17, pp.159~166 (2014)
- Kruijver IP, "Communication skills of nurses during interactions with simulated cancer patients", J Adv Nurs, 34, pp.772~779 (2001)
- Beigzadeh A, "Standardized patients versus simulated patients in medical education: are they the same or different", J Emerg Pract Trauma, 2, pp.25~28 (2016)
- Berg K, "A comparison of medical students’ self-reported empathy with simulated patients’ assessments of the students’ empathy", Med Teach, 33, pp.388~391 (2011)
- Gisondi MA, "Assessment of resident professionalism using high-fidelity simulation of ethical dilemmas", Acad Emerg Med, 11, pp.931~937 (2004)
- Cleland JA, "The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No 42", Med Teach, 31, pp.477~486 (2009)
- Wilson WJ, "Student audiologists’ impressions of a simulation training program", Aus and N Z J Audiol, 32, pp.19~30 (2010)
- English K, "Informing parents of their child’s hearing loss “Breaking bad news” guidelines for audiologists", Audiology Today, 16, pp.10~12 (2004)
- English K, "Development of an instrument to evaluate audiologic counseling skills", J Am Acad Audiol, 18, pp.675~687 (2007)
- Naeve-Velguth S, "Simulated patients in audiology education: student reports", J Am Acad Audiol, 24, pp.740~746 (2013)
- Issenberg SB, "Simulation in health care education", Perspect Biol Med, 51, pp.31~46 (2008)
- Bokken L, "Feedback by simulated patients in undergraduate medical education:a systematic review of the literature", Med Educ, 43, pp.202~210 (2009)
- Bokken L, "Strengths and weaknesses of simulated and real patients in the teaching of skills to medical students: a review", Simul Healthc, 3, pp.161~169 (2008)
- Arafeh JM, "Debriefing in simulated-based learning: facilitating a reflective discussion", J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 24, pp.302~309 (2010)
- Ryoo EN, "The importance of debriefing in simulation-based learning: comparison between debriefing and no debriefing", Comput Inform Nurs, 33, pp.538~545 (2015)
- Grant JS, "Using video-facilitated feedback to improve student performance following high-fidelity simulation", Clin Simul Nurs, 6, pp.e177~e184 (2010)
- Schwid HA, "Screen-based anesthesia simulation with debriefing improves performance in a mannequin-based anesthesia simulator", Teach Learn Med, 13, pp.92~96 (2001)
- Allen S, "A method for collaboratively developing and validating a rubric", IJ-SoTL, 3, pp.n2~ (2009)
- "Drama: contrasting monologues unit and rubric individual performance and rubric"[URL]
- Hill AE, "An investigation of the standardised patient interview rating scale (SPIRS) for the assessment of speech pathology students in a simulation clinic", Int J Pract Learn Health Social Care, 3, pp.58~76 (2015)
- Meltzer DE, "The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: a possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores", Am J Phys, 70, pp.1259~1268 (2002)