Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Adults With Cochlear Implants: A Comparison With Adults With Normal Hearing
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives: To examine the maturational status of the auditory cortex in adults with cochlear implants (CIs) using the latencies of the P1, N1, and P2 components of cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs). Subjects and Methods: A total of 25 adults with CIs and 25 age-matched, normal-hearing control subjects participated in this study. Specifically, patients with CIs were divided into three groups depending on their age of deafness onset: Group A comprised patients with prelingual deafness who had received CI during early childhood (n=7), Group B comprised patients with early childhood-onset, progressive deafness who had received CI during childhood (n=6), and Group C comprised patients with adult-onset deafness (n=12). The P1, N1, and P2 latencies of their CAEPs were then compared between CI patients and normal-hearing subjects. Results: All participants showed clear CAEP responses. P1 and N1 latencies in Group A and Group C patients were significantly longer than those in the control group. Meanwhile, Group B patients had significantly longer N1 and P2 latencies, as compared with those in the control group. Conclusions: Patients with prelingual deafness and those with early-childhood onset, progressive deafness who received CI developed primary and higher-order auditory areas postoperatively when they became adults. However, their auditory cortex maturational statuses seemed to be worse than that of normal-hearing individuals. Furthermore, adult patients with late-onset deafness might experience degenerative auditory cortex changes during the auditory deprivation period between deafness onset and cochlear implantation.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To examine the maturational status of the auditory cortex in adults with cochlear implants (CIs) using the latencies of the P1, N1, and P2 components of cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs). Subjects and Methods: A total of 25 adults with CIs and 25 age-matched, normal-hearing control subjects participated in this study. Specifically, patients with CIs were divided into three groups depending on their age of deafness onset: Group A comprised patients with prelingual deafness who had received CI during early childhood (n=7), Group B comprised patients with early childhood-onset, progressive deafness who had received CI during childhood (n=6), and Group C comprised patients with adult-onset deafness (n=12). The P1, N1, and P2 latencies of their CAEPs were then compared between CI patients and normal-hearing subjects. Results: All participants showed clear CAEP responses. P1 and N1 latencies in Group A and Group C patients were significantly longer than those in the control group. Meanwhile, Group B patients had significantly longer N1 and P2 latencies, as compared with those in the control group. Conclusions: Patients with prelingual deafness and those with early-childhood onset, progressive deafness who received CI developed primary and higher-order auditory areas postoperatively when they became adults. However, their auditory cortex maturational statuses seemed to be worse than that of normal-hearing individuals. Furthermore, adult patients with late-onset deafness might experience degenerative auditory cortex changes during the auditory deprivation period between deafness onset and cochlear implantation.
참고문헌 (16)
- Sharma A, "A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants : implications for age of implantation", Ear Hear, 23, pp.532~539 (2002)
- Lee DS, "Crossmodal plasticity and cochlear implants", Nature, 409, pp.149~150 (2001)
- Sharma A, "Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation", Neuroreport, 13, pp.1365~1368 (2002)
- Eggermont JJ, "Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users", Acta Otolaryngol, 117, pp.161~163 (1997)
- Lightfoot G, "Summary of the N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potential to estimate the auditory threshold in adults", Semin Hear, 37, pp.1~8 (2016)
- Kral A, "Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation", Trends Neurosci, 35, pp.111~122 (2012)
- Wunderlich JL, "Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children", Hear Res, 212, pp.185~202 (2006)
- Sharma A, "The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants", Hear Res, 203, pp.134~143 (2005)
- Sharma A, "P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment", J Am Acad Audiol, 16, pp.564~573 (2005)
- Dorman MF, "Central auditory development : evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants", J Commun Disord, 40, pp.284~294 (2007)
- Kim JR, "Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging : effects of stimulus intensity and noise", Otol Neurotol, 33, pp.1105~1112 (2012)
- Jeong SW, "P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants; implication for the timing of second cochlear implantation", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 275, pp.1759~1765 (2018)
- Niparko JK, "Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation", JAMA, 303, pp.1498~1506 (2010)
- Sharma A, "Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants", Int J Audiol, 46, pp.494~499 (2007)
- Sharma A, "Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables", Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol, 104, pp.540~545 (1997)
- Strøm-Roum H, "Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants in children with sequential surgery", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76, pp.95~99 (2012)