본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Enhancing the Effectiveness of the Counter-Terrorism Regime : A Need for Setting Two Distinct Counter-Terrorism Regimes

안태희
법학연구소 (The Institute of Legal Studies Konkuk University)|2014.03|가천법학 (Gachon Law Review)|제7권 제1호|pp. 151-188

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

테러리즘terrorisminternational terrorismcounter-terrorism국제테러convention on international terrorism대테러 체제포괄적 국제테러협약국제테러협약
주제분류법학

초록

The ongoing debate centered around the scope of the currentcounter-terrorism regime and lack of the effectiveimplementation of specific counter-terrorism conventions are theresult of the discrepancy between the Arab states group and theWestern states group on the exclusion of the exercise ofpeople’s right to self-determination and/or of state’s armedforces from the scope of international terrorism. Especially, inthe course of negotiating the Comprehensive Convention onInternational Terrorism (CCIT), the two groups have failed tocompromise their different stances, rather still engagingthemselves in an early stage debate over which and whose actsare to be excluded from the CCIT. This intense discord pointsus towards the desirable role of the CCIT: to provide a door toset a clear-cut boundary between a peacetime counter-terrorismregime and a counter-terrorism regime during armed conflict. States can limit the scope of the CCIT to peacetime terrorismonly, while terrorism during armed conflict is governed byinternational humanitarian law (IHL). A high-level conference, aneed for which was raised in the course of the discussion on theCCIT, would be the best place for addressing the issue ofenhancing effectiveness of both regimes respectively.

Abstract

The ongoing debate centered around the scope of the currentcounter-terrorism regime and lack of the effectiveimplementation of specific counter-terrorism conventions are theresult of the discrepancy between the Arab states group and theWestern states group on the exclusion of the exercise ofpeople’s right to self-determination and/or of state’s armedforces from the scope of international terrorism. Especially, inthe course of negotiating the Comprehensive Convention onInternational Terrorism (CCIT), the two groups have failed tocompromise their different stances, rather still engagingthemselves in an early stage debate over which and whose actsare to be excluded from the CCIT. This intense discord pointsus towards the desirable role of the CCIT: to provide a door toset a clear-cut boundary between a peacetime counter-terrorismregime and a counter-terrorism regime during armed conflict. States can limit the scope of the CCIT to peacetime terrorismonly, while terrorism during armed conflict is governed byinternational humanitarian law (IHL). A high-level conference, aneed for which was raised in the course of the discussion on theCCIT, would be the best place for addressing the issue ofenhancing effectiveness of both regimes respectively.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Bassiouni, M. Cherif, "International Terrorism: A Compilation of U.N. Documents (1972-2001)" (2001)
  2. Higgins, Rosalyn, "Terrorism and International Law" (1997)
  3. Polaine, Martin, "Counter-Terrorism Law and Practice: An International Handbook", ~ (2009)
  4. Rehman, Javaid, "Islamic State Practices, International Law and the Threat from Terrorism" (2005)
  5. Saul, Ben, "Defining Terrorism in International Law" (2006)
  6. Van Leewen, M, "Confronting Terrorism 207" (2003)
  7. Dugard, John, "International Terrorism: Problems of Definition", Int’l Aff, 50, pp.67~ (1974)
  8. Hakimi, Monica, "A Functional Approach to Targeting and Detention", Michigan Law Review, 110, pp.1366~ (2012)
  9. Weiss, Peter Ulrich, "Terrorism, Counterterrorism and International Law", Arab Stud. Q., No. 2002, ~ (2002)
  10. "International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings", Dec. 15, 1997, 2149 U.N.T.S. 256, ~ (1997)
  11. "International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism", Dec. 9, 1999, 2178 U.N.T.S. 197, ~ (1999)
  12. "International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism", Apr. 13, 2005, 2445 U.N.T.S. 89, ~ (2005)
  13. "Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft", Sept. 14, 1963, 704 U.N.T.S. 219, ~ (1963)
  14. "Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft", Dec. 16, 1970, 860 U.N.T.S. 105, ~ (1970)
  15. "Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation", Sept. 23, 1971, 974 U.N.T.S. 177, ~ (1971)
  16. "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, Including Diplomatic Agents", Dec. 14, 1973, 1035 U.N.T.S. 167, ~ (1973)
  17. "International Convention against the Taking of Hostages", Dec. 17, 1979, 1316 U.N.T.S. 205, ~ (1979)
  18. "Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation", Mar. 10, 1988, 1678 U.N.T.S. 201, ~ (1988)
  19. "Convention of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference on Combating International Terrorism", Jul. 1, 1999, Annex to Res. No. 59, 1999
  20. "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts", June 8, 1977, 1125 U.N.T.S. 3, ~ (1977)
  21. "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)", June 8, 1977, 1125 U.N.T.S. 609, ~ (1977)
  22. "Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (First Geneva Convention)", Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 31, ~ (1949)
  23. "Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea (Second Geneva Convention)", Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 85, ~ (1949)
  24. "Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Third Geneva Convention)", Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, ~ (1949)
  25. "Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention)", Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 287, ~ (1949)
  26. "G.A. Res. 3034 (XXVII), U.N. Doc. A", RES, pp.1972, ~
  27. "G.A. Res. 51", 210, U.N. Doc. A, 51, pp.210[DOI]
  28. "G.A. Res. 60", 288, U.N. Doc. A, 60, pp.288[DOI]
  29. "General Assembly, 6th Comm., Rep. of the Working Grp., Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism", UN. Doc. A, 55, pp.L.2, 2000[DOI]
  30. "General Assembly, 6th Comm., Rep. of the Working Grp., Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism, Annex", UN. Doc. A, 65, pp.L.10, 2010[DOI]
  31. "Rep. of the Ad Hoc Committee established by General Assembly resolution 51", 210 of 17 December 1996, 58, pp.37;U.N. GAOR, 7th Sess., Supp. No. 37, 2003[DOI]
  32. "Rep. of the Ad Hoc Committee established by General Assembly resolution 51", 210, 59, pp.37; U.N. GAOR, 59th Sess., Supp. No. 37, 2004[DOI]
  33. "Rep. of the Ad Hoc Committee Established by General Assembly Resolution 51", 210, 66, pp.37; U.N. GAOR, 15th Sess., Supp. No. 37, 2011[DOI]
  34. "Press Release, General Assembly, Legal Committee Hears Calls for Global Collaboration in Fight against International Terrorism", U.N. Press Release GA, 3167, pp.2000, ~
  35. "General Assembly, Letter dated 11 October 2001 from the Permanent Representative of Qatar to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, Annex II", U.N. Doc. A, 462-S, pp.2001, 962[DOI]
  36. Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate, "Global Survey of the Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) by Member states, Sec. Council", U.N. Doc. S, 463, pp.2011 (2011), ~
  37. "Analysis of the punishments applicable to international crimes (war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide) in domestic law and practice", Int’l Rev. Red Cross, (870) (2008)
  38. Int’l Comm. of the Red Cross, "Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949", ~ (1987)
  39. Int’l Comm. of the Red Cross, "International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts", 31IC, 5.1.2, pp.2011, ~
  40. "Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force"[URL]
  41. "Int’l Civil Aviation Org."[URL]
  42. "International Legal Instruments to Counterterrorism, UN Action to Counter Terrorism"[URL]
  43. "Status of Ratification Database, U.N. Office on Drugs & Crime", ~
  44. "Iraq Faces Massive U.S. Missile Barrage" (2009)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

Peaceful Resolution of Disputes vis-à-vis Counter‐terrorism and the Use of Force Peaceful Resolution of Disputes vis-à-vis Counter‐terrorism and the Use of Force전광호국제지역연구원 · 아태연구2007 · 제14권 제2호국제 반테러(Counter-Terroism) 레짐의 현황과 전망박상현국가안보전략연구원 · 국가안보와 전략2008 · 제8권 제3호Legal Aspects of the Prevention and Suppression of Maritime Terrorism in the Asia-Pacific RegionHongsheng Sheng한국국방연구원 · The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis2012 · 제24권 제1호A Comparative Examination of Counter-Terrorism Law and PolicyJohn Yoo, Laurent Mayali아시아태평양법연구소 · Journal of Korean Law2016 · 제16권 제1호國際法上 테러의 規制制度와 우리 나라의 테러 規制方案에 관한 考察김영석대한변호사협회 · 인권과 정의2005 · 제350호국제테러리즘과 국제법성재호법학연구원 · 성균관법학2002 · 제14권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

지방의회 우수 조례의 조건에 관한 일 고찰 - 우수조례 심사 소감을 토대로 하여 -김영진pp. 1-222013년 타결된 WTO “발리 패키지(the Bali Package)”에 대한 연구김상만pp. 23-46FDI and Labor Market Flexibility on the Employee’s Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of Civil and Common Law신동윤pp. 47-88부당한 공동행위로 인한 손해배상청구권 -공정거래법상 성립요건과 손해액 산정을 중심으로-장윤순pp. 89-126사회적기업의 활성화 방안 관한 연구하재관, 박강익pp. 127-150
원문 보기