Comparison of Speech Perception Performance According to Prosody Change Between People With Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implant Users
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives: Cochlear implants (CIs) are well known to improve audibility and speech recognition in individuals with hearing loss, but some individuals still struggle with many aspects in communication, such as prosody. This study explores how prosodic elements are perceived by those with normal hearing (NH) and CIs.Subjects and Methods: Thirteen individuals with NH and thirteen CI users participated in this study and completed speech perception, speech prosody perception, speech prosody production, pitch difference discrimination, and melodic contour perception testing.Results: NH listeners performed significantly better than CI users on speech perception, speech prosody perception (except for words with neutral meaning and a negative prosody change and when words were repeated twice), pitch difference discrimination, and melodic contour perception testing. No statistical significance was observed for speech prosody production for both groups.Conclusions: Compared to NH listeners, CI users had limited ability to recognize prosodic elements. The study findings highlight the necessity of an assessment tool and signal processing algorithm for CIs, specifically targeting prosodic elements in clinical settings.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cochlear implants (CIs) are well known to improve audibility and speech recognition in individuals with hearing loss, but some individuals still struggle with many aspects in communication, such as prosody. This study explores how prosodic elements are perceived by those with normal hearing (NH) and CIs.Subjects and Methods: Thirteen individuals with NH and thirteen CI users participated in this study and completed speech perception, speech prosody perception, speech prosody production, pitch difference discrimination, and melodic contour perception testing.Results: NH listeners performed significantly better than CI users on speech perception, speech prosody perception (except for words with neutral meaning and a negative prosody change and when words were repeated twice), pitch difference discrimination, and melodic contour perception testing. No statistical significance was observed for speech prosody production for both groups.Conclusions: Compared to NH listeners, CI users had limited ability to recognize prosodic elements. The study findings highlight the necessity of an assessment tool and signal processing algorithm for CIs, specifically targeting prosodic elements in clinical settings.
참고문헌 (40)
- Jakobson R, "Style in Language", pp.350~377 (1960), MIT Press
- Norris D, "Shortlist : a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition", Cognition, 52, pp.189~234 (1994)
- Keightley ML, "An fMRI study investigating cognitive modulation of brain regions associated with emotional processing of visual stimuli", Neuropsychologia, 41, pp.585~596 (2003)
- Critchley H, "Explicit and implicit neural mechanisms for processing of social information from facial expressions : a functional magnetic resonance imaging study", Hum Brain Mapp, 9, pp.93~105 (2000)
- Haugen E, "Phoneme or prosodeme?", Language, 25, pp.278~282 (1949)
- Varadarajan VV, "Evolving criteria for adult and pediatric cochlear implantation", Ear Nose Throat J, 100, pp.31~37 (2021)
- Seol HY, "Hearables as a gateway to hearing health care", Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 15, pp.127~134 (2022)
- Chang SO, "Cochlear implant in children", Korean J Audiol, 1, pp.13~21 (1997)
- Cho YB, "Basic consideration for cochlear implant", Korean J Audiol, 1, pp.3~12 (1997)
- Hainarosie M, "The evolution of cochlear implant technology and its clinical relevance", J Med Life, 7(Spec No. 2), pp.1~4 (2014)
- Ketterer MC, "Binaural hearing rehabilitation improves speech perception, quality of life, tinnitus distress, and psychological comorbidities", Otol Neurotol, 41, pp.e563~e574 (2020)
- Laske RD, "Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults", Otol Neurotol, 30, pp.313~318 (2009)
- Moon IJ, "The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 269, pp.739~745 (2012)
- Chang YS, "Benefit and predictive factors for speech perception outcomes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients", Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 85, pp.571~577 (2019)
- Lee JY, "Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on electrophysiological and psychophysical measures : lateral wall versus perimodiolar types", J Audiol Otol, 23, pp.145~152 (2019)
- Tyagi P, "Clinical and social outcomes of cochlear implantation in older prelinguals", J Audiol Otol, 27, pp.63~70 (2023)
- Šantić IŠ, "Language intervention instead of speech intervention for children with cochlear implants", J Audiol Otol, 27, pp.55~62 (2023)
- Hwang K, "Feasibility of revision cochlear implant surgery for better speech comprehension", J Audiol Otol, 23, pp.112~117 (2019)
- Marx M, "Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing", Ear Hear, 36, pp.239~248 (2015)
- Green T, "Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants", J Acoust Soc Am, 116(4 Pt 1), pp.2298~2310 (2004)
- Peng SC, "Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing", Ear Hear, 29, pp.336~351 (2008)
- Peng SC, "Perception and production of mandarin tones in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants", Ear Hear, 25, pp.251~264 (2004)
- Nakata T, "Effect of cochlear implants on children’s perception and production of speech prosody", J Acoust Soc Am, 131, pp.1307~1314 (2012)
- Klieve S, "Perception of prosodic features by children with cochlear implants : is it sufficient for understanding meaning differences in language?", Deaf Educ Int, 3, pp.15~37 (2001)
- Lenden JM, "Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants", J Commun Disord, 40, pp.66~81 (2007)
- Wilkinson AS, "Speech intelligibility rating of cochlear implanted children : inter-rater reliability", Cochlear Implants Int, 4, pp.22~30 (2003)
- Archbold S, "Categories of auditory performance : inter-user reliability", Br J Audiol, 32, pp.7~12 (1998)
- The Korean Audiological Society, "Speech perception test in practice", pp.281~285 (2021), Hakjisa
- Jung KH, "Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners", Acta Otolaryngol, 130, pp.716~723 (2010)
- Galvin JJ 3rd, "Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users", Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1169, pp.518~533 (2009)
- Govaerts PJ, "Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years", Otol Neurotol, 23, pp.885~890 (2002)
- Tobey EA, "Effects of a nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children", Ear Hear, 12(4 Suppl), pp.48S~54S (1991)
- Most T, "Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing AIDS", J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, 12, pp.350~361 (2007)
- Pereira C, "Cochlear Implants", pp.343~345 (2000), Thieme
- Luo X, "Vocal emotion recognition by normalhearing listeners and cochlear implant users", Trends Amplif, 11, pp.301~315 (2007)
- Rastegarianzadeh N, "Study of phonological awareness of preschool and school aged children with cochlear implant and normal hearing", Korean J Audiol, 18, pp.50~53 (2014)
- Grossmann T, "Infants’ electric brain responses to emotional prosody", Neuroreport, 16, pp.1825~1828 (2005)
- Ahn SJ, "The perception and production of the final question intonations for the cochlear implantee", Korean J Audiol, 7, pp.136~140 (2003)
- Kim EY, "The relationship between perception of prosody, pitch discrimination, and melodic contour identification in cochlear implants recipients", J Music Hum Behav, 14, pp.1~18 (2017)
- Lee HG, "The pragmatics of the discourse particle eti in Korean", Urimalgeul : Korean Lang Lit, 44, pp.83~111 (2008)