A Study for Composition and Comparison of the Music Perception Tests for Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implant Users
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compose the test for music perception and analyze the characteristic of cochlear implant users’ music perception. Methods: The test was made up with the pitch, melody, and timbre factors, using three low and high frequencies, six music genres, and four types of musical instruments correspondingly. The tests were conducted to 10 normal-hearing (NH) young adults and 10 young cochlear-implant (CI) users. Results: All the music perception tests showed significant differences between NH and CI group [F(1, 4) = 0.018, p = 0.019]. In the pitch test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate(51.3%) than NH group (82.7%) did with higher correction rates in low frequencies. In the melody test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate (29.7%) than NH group (95.8%) did with the highest performance in folk songs (51.7%). In the timbre test, CI group showed significantly reduced performance (22.5%) than NH group (65.8%) did. For both CI and NH groups, the pitched percussion showed the highest scores (45% and 100%) while the woodwind showed the lowest scores (13.3% and 48.3%). Conclusion: Out of three tests, CI group showed better performance in pitch perception than melody and timber perception. CI group showed better performances in low pitch sounds, melodies of familiar genre, and sound of pitched percussion instruments’ timber showing complicated music perception ability. To enhance the music perception ability for CI users by aural rehabilitation, more specified and systematic music perception test material should be developed.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compose the test for music perception and analyze the characteristic of cochlear implant users’ music perception. Methods: The test was made up with the pitch, melody, and timbre factors, using three low and high frequencies, six music genres, and four types of musical instruments correspondingly. The tests were conducted to 10 normal-hearing (NH) young adults and 10 young cochlear-implant (CI) users. Results: All the music perception tests showed significant differences between NH and CI group [F(1, 4) = 0.018, p = 0.019]. In the pitch test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate(51.3%) than NH group (82.7%) did with higher correction rates in low frequencies. In the melody test, CI group showed significantly lower correction rate (29.7%) than NH group (95.8%) did with the highest performance in folk songs (51.7%). In the timbre test, CI group showed significantly reduced performance (22.5%) than NH group (65.8%) did. For both CI and NH groups, the pitched percussion showed the highest scores (45% and 100%) while the woodwind showed the lowest scores (13.3% and 48.3%). Conclusion: Out of three tests, CI group showed better performance in pitch perception than melody and timber perception. CI group showed better performances in low pitch sounds, melodies of familiar genre, and sound of pitched percussion instruments’ timber showing complicated music perception ability. To enhance the music perception ability for CI users by aural rehabilitation, more specified and systematic music perception test material should be developed.
참고문헌 (31)
- Ahn, J., "Long-term changes in musical perception in Korean cochlear implant patients", Otology and Neurotology, 40(3), pp.312~320 (2019)
- Besson, M., "Influence of musical expertise and musical training on pitch processing in music and language", Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25(3-4), pp.399~410 (2007)
- Brown, C. J., "Effects of long-term musical training on cortical auditory evoked potentials", Ear and Hearing, 38(2), pp.e74~e84 (2017)
- Choi, J. E., "Relationship between spectrotemporal modulation detection and music perception in normal-hearing, hearingimpaired, and cochlear implant listeners", Scientific Reports, 8(1), pp.1~11 (2018)
- Crew, J. D., "Channel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implants", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(5), pp.EL429~EL435 (2012)
- Feldmann, H., "Listening to music in hearing loss with and without a hearing aid", Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie, 67(10), pp.489~497 (1988)
- Fitzgerald, D., "Musical Sounds in Cochlear Implants (MuSIC)Test" (2006), MED-EL
- Gfeller, K., "Music-based training for pediatric CI recipients:A systematic analysis of published studies", European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 133(Suppl 1), pp.S50~S56 (2016)
- Gfeller, K., "Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19(2), pp.120~134 (2008)
- Gfeller, K., "Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13(3), pp.132~145 (2002)
- Good, A., "Benefits of music training for perception of emotional speech prosody in deaf children with cochlear implants", Ear and Hearing, 38(4), pp.455~464 (2017)
- Gordon, E. E., "Music Aptitude and Related Tests" (2001), GIA Publications, Inc
- Grey, J. M., "Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), pp.1270~1277 (1977)
- Hall, J. W., "New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses" (2007), Pearson
- 한우재, "인공와우를 이용한 음악지각에 대한 고찰", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 62(4), pp.207~215 (2019), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Hutter, E., "Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study", Cochlear Implants International, 16(Suppl 3), pp.S13~S21 (2015)
- Jung, K. H., "Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners", Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 130(6), pp.716~723 (2010)
- Kang, R., "Development and validation of the University of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test", Ear and Hearing, 30(4), pp.411~418 (2009)
- Kong, Y. Y., "Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing", Ear and Hearing, 25(2), pp.173~185 (2004)
- Limb, C. J., "Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users", Hearing Research, 308, pp.13~26 (2014)
- Martin, B. A., "Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(4), pp.2155~2161 (2000)
- McDermott, H., "U.S. Patent No. 7,231,257", Patent and Trademark Office, ~ (2007)
- Moore, B. C., "Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(3), pp.1093~1101 (1988)
- Nimmons, G. L., "Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners", Otology and Neurotology, 29(2), pp.149~155 (2008)
- Nogueira, W., "Making music more accessible for cochlear implant listeners : Recent developments", IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(1), pp.115~127 (2018)
- Roy, A. T., "Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant(CI)users as a function of limited high-frequency perception", Trends in Amplification, 16(4), pp.191~200 (2012)
- Sek, A., "Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(4), pp.2479~2486 (1995)
- Sucher, C. M., "Bimodal stimulation:Benefits for music perception and sound quality", Cochlear Implants International, 10(Suppl 1), pp.96~99 (2009)
- Tervaniemi, M., "Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians : An event-related potential and behavioral study", Experimental Brain Research, 161(1), pp.1~10 (2005)
- Yang, S. Y., "Music and Art Concept Dictionary: A Clear View of Music and Art" (2010), Owlbook
- Zeng, F. G., "Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation", PLoS One, 9(2), pp.e88662~ (2014)