Development of classification criteria for non-reactor nuclear facilities in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Non-reactor nuclear facilities are increasing remarkably in Korea combined with advanced technologies such as life and space engineering, and the diversification of the nuclear industry. However, the absence of a basic classification guideline related to the design of non-reactor nuclear facilities has created confusion whenever related projects are carried out. In this paper, related domestic and international technical guidelines are reviewed to present the classification criteria of non-reactor nuclear facilities in Korea. Based on these criteria, the classification of structures, systems and components (SSCs) for safety controls is presented. Using the presented classification criteria, classification of a hot cell facility, a representative non-reactor nuclear facility, was performed. As a result of the classification, the hot cell facility is classified as the hazard category 3, accordingly, the safety class was classified as non-nuclear safety, the seismic category as non-seismic (RW-IIb), and the quality class as manufacturers’ standards (S).
Abstract
Non-reactor nuclear facilities are increasing remarkably in Korea combined with advanced technologies such as life and space engineering, and the diversification of the nuclear industry. However, the absence of a basic classification guideline related to the design of non-reactor nuclear facilities has created confusion whenever related projects are carried out. In this paper, related domestic and international technical guidelines are reviewed to present the classification criteria of non-reactor nuclear facilities in Korea. Based on these criteria, the classification of structures, systems and components (SSCs) for safety controls is presented. Using the presented classification criteria, classification of a hot cell facility, a representative non-reactor nuclear facility, was performed. As a result of the classification, the hot cell facility is classified as the hazard category 3, accordingly, the safety class was classified as non-nuclear safety, the seismic category as non-seismic (RW-IIb), and the quality class as manufacturers’ standards (S).
참고문헌 (15)
- "NSSC Notice 2018-6 “The Regulations on the Reactor Safety Classes and the Corresponding Specifications", The Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, ~ (2018)
- "NSSC Notice 2017-15, Technical Standard for the Location of the Nuclear Facilities", The Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, ~ (2017)
- "NSSC Notice 2017-16 the Technical Standard for the Location of Nuclear Reactor Facilities", The Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, ~ (2017)
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, “Energy,” Part 100.11", Determination of Exclusion Area, Low Population Zone and Population Center Distance, US NRC, ~
- Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Report, "U.S. Department of Energy", ~, pp.US DOE, DOE-STD-1027 (1992)
- Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Non-reactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analyses, "U. S. Department of Energy", US DOE, ~, pp.DOE-STD-3009 (1994)
- American Nuclear Society, "American National Standard Safety Categorization and Design Criteria for Non-reactor Nuclear Facilities vol. 16", ANS, ANSI, 2014, pp.58~
- Design guidance for radioactive waste management systems, structures and components installed in light-watercooled nuclear power plants, "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission", US NRC, ~, pp.Regul. Guide 1.143, Rev 2 (2001)
- seismic design classification, "U.S. Nuclear regulatory commission", ~, pp.US NRC Regulatory Guide 1 (29) (2007)
- IAEA, "Safety Assessment for Decommissioning" (2013)
- U.S. Department of Energy, "Hazard and Accident Analysis Handbook" (2018), US DOE
- Long-lived activation product in reactor materials, "J.C. Evans", US NRC, ~, pp.NUREG (1984), CR- 3474
- Categorization of Nuclear Facility Structures, Systems, and Components for Seismic Design, vol. 26, "American Nuclear Society", ANS, ~, pp.ANSI (2004), ANS-2
- U.S. Department of Energy, "Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities" (2002), US DOE
- Hot Cell Facility (HCF) Safety Analysis Report, "G.W. Mitchell", Sandia National Laboratories, ~, pp.SAND2000-2355 (2000)