본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ~0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ~3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ~15% of experimental data

Abstract

To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ~0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ~3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ~15% of experimental data

참고문헌 (34)

  1. G. Saji, "Safety for seismic and tsunami risks : lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi disaster", Nucl. Eng. Des, 280, pp.449~463 (2014)
  2. N. R. C. Us, "Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century:the Near Term Task Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident" (2011), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  3. Seismic Fragility Test of a 6-inch Diameter Pipe System, "W. P. Chen", ~, pp.NUREG (1987), CR-4859
  4. Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES, "NUPEC Ultimate Strength Piping Test Program", G. DeGrassi, 1987, NUREG[DOI]
  5. A. Ravikiran, "Experimental and numerical studies of ratcheting in a pressurized piping system under seismic load", J. Pressure Vessel Technol, 137, pp.031011~ (2015)
  6. I. Nakamura, "Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis part 3 e variation in elastic-plastic analysis results on carbon steel pipes from the benchmark analysis and the parametric analysis", Proceedings of ASME PVP (2017)
  7. J. W. Kim, "Evaluation of deformation and failure behaviors of nuclear piping components under beyond design basis seismic loads using a simulated specimen", J. Pressure Vessel Technol, 142, pp.051305~ (2020)
  8. ASME, "Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, ASME BPVC Section III", ~ (2019)
  9. S. Vishnuvardhan, "Fatigue ratcheting studies on TP304 LN stainless steel straight pipes", Procedia Eng, 2, pp.2209~2218 (2010)
  10. S. Vishnuvardhan, "Ratcheting studies on type 304LN stainless steel elbows subjected to combined internal pressure and in-plane bending moment", J. Pressure Vessel Technol, 134, pp.041203~ (2012)
  11. T. Hassan, "Low-cycle fatigue and ratcheting responses of elbow piping components", J. Pressure Vessel Technol, 137, pp.031010~ (2015)
  12. A. Otani, "Consideration on seismic design margin of elbow in piping", Proceedings of ASME PVP (2011)
  13. "JSME S NC1-2005 in Japanese", ~
  14. G. E. Varelis, "Pipe elbows under strong cyclic loading", J. Pressure Vessel Technol, 135, pp.011207~ (2013)
  15. ASME, "Process Piping, vol. 3, ASME standard B31", ~ (2006)
  16. Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities e Rules on Design and Construction for Nuclear Power Plant: Alternative Design for Seismic Design of Seismic S Class Steel Piping Based on Elastic-Plastic Response Analysis, "JSME", ~, pp.NCCC-008 (2019)
  17. 김종성, "Precise dynamic finite element elastic-plastic seismic analysis considering welds for nuclear power plants", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(7), pp.2550~2563 (2022), 한국원자력학회[DOI]
  18. G. H. Koo, "Shaking table tests to validate inelastic seismic analysis method applicable to nuclear metal components", Appl. Sci, 11, pp.9264~ (2021)
  19. J. S. Kim, "An efficient simplified elastic-plastic analysis procedure using engineering formula for strain-based fatigue assessment of nuclear safety class 1 piping system subjected to severe seismic loads", Int. J. Fatig, 151, pp.106390~ (2021)
  20. ASME, "Alternative Rules for Level D Service Limit of Class 1, 2 and 3 Piping System, ASME BPVC Code Case N-900", ~ (2019)
  21. G. H. Koo, "Feasibility study on strain-based seismic design criteria for nuclear components", Energies, 13, pp.4435~ (2020)
  22. 장동주, "Effect of damage evaluation method and cyclic hardening models on strain-based fatigue assessment to a piping system under seismic loads", Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34(7), pp.2833~2844 (2020), 대한기계학회[DOI]
  23. ASME, "Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, ASME BPVC Section VIII", ~ (2019)
  24. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, "ASTM", American Society for Testing and Materials, ~, pp.E8-15 (2015)
  25. W. Prager, "A new method of analyzing stresses and strains in work hardening plastic solids", J. Appl. Mech, 23, pp.493~496 (1956)
  26. ASME, "Materials, ASME BPVC Section II", New York, ~ (2019)
  27. ABAQUS Version 2018, "ABAQUS", Dassault Systems, ~ (2018)
  28. S. Bari, "Anatomy of coupled constitutive models for ratcheting simulation", Int. J. Plast, 16, pp.381~409 (2000)
  29. J. R. Rice, "On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields", J. Mech. Phys. Solid, 17, pp.201~217 (1969)
  30. A. M. Kanvinde, "Cyclic void growth model to assess ductile fracture initiation in structural steels due to ultra-low cycle fatigue", J. Eng. Mech, 133(6), pp.701~712 (2007)
  31. Effects of LWR Coolant Environments on the Fatigue Life of Reactor Materials, "O.K. Chopra", Argonne National Laboratory, ~, pp.NUREG (2007), CR-6909, ANL-06[DOI]
  32. W. D. Callister, "Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering:an Integrated Approach" (2018), John Wiley & Sons
  33. N. Kasahara, "Structural analysis approach for risk assessment under BDBE", Proceedings of ASME PVP (2018)
  34. N. Kasahara, "Contribution to safety enhancement for BDBE in structure and material fields", Proceedings of ASME PVP (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

변형각의 측정 위치에 따른 6인치 탄소강관엘보의 파괴기준김성완, 박동욱, 윤다운, 장성진, 전법규한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2022 · 제26권 제1호Round Robin Analysis to Investigate Sensitivity of Analysis Results to Finite Element Elastic-Plastic Analysis Variables for Nuclear Safety Class 1 Components under Severe Seismic Load구경회, 김윤재, 김종성, 김종인, 김준영, 남일권, 박준근, 안상원, 이봉희, 이종민, 조민기, 허남수한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제1호Low-cycle fatigue evaluation for girth-welded pipes based on the structural strain method considering cyclic material behavior김명현, 이진호, Pingsha Dong대한조선학회 · International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering2020 · 제12권 4인치 강재 배관 엘보의 저주기 피로에 대한 한계상태평가김성완, 박동욱, 윤다운, 장성진, 전법규한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 · 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집2025 · 제29권 제2호다지점 진동대를 이용한 원자력발전소 배관계통의 내진 성능실험계만수, 김민규, 서영득, 정진환, 최형석한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2013 · 제17권 제1호Stress evaluation method of reinforced wall-thinned Class 2/3 nuclear pipes for structural integrity assessment김윤재, 김재윤, 장제훈, 황진하한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2024 · 제56권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (41건)