본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Quantitative evaluation of uncertain parameters for thermal-hydraulic experiments based on the COSINE code

6

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

Identifying important phenomena and parameters of LBLOCAs is an important step in nuclear power safety evaluation. Traditional identification processes are based on experience and incorporate important phenomena and parameters without quantifying specific aspects of the models. To accurately identify physical effects, this paper presents the use of multiphase field subchannel code for simulation analysis as applied to numerical examples and specific reactor thermal-hydraulic problems. The results indicate that the code can simulate the relevant phenomena, and the calculation band of the refill stage is narrow, while the calculation band of the reflood stage is wide. In addition, the key impact models are captured. The radiation model most significantly impacts the cladding temperature in the core, and the heat transfer model of transition boiling to the gas phase is most strongly influenced by the quenching time. The interfacial heat transfer model of the large bubble regime for the liquid plays a major role in influencing the water inventory of the lower plenum in the downcomer

Abstract

Identifying important phenomena and parameters of LBLOCAs is an important step in nuclear power safety evaluation. Traditional identification processes are based on experience and incorporate important phenomena and parameters without quantifying specific aspects of the models. To accurately identify physical effects, this paper presents the use of multiphase field subchannel code for simulation analysis as applied to numerical examples and specific reactor thermal-hydraulic problems. The results indicate that the code can simulate the relevant phenomena, and the calculation band of the refill stage is narrow, while the calculation band of the reflood stage is wide. In addition, the key impact models are captured. The radiation model most significantly impacts the cladding temperature in the core, and the heat transfer model of transition boiling to the gas phase is most strongly influenced by the quenching time. The interfacial heat transfer model of the large bubble regime for the liquid plays a major role in influencing the water inventory of the lower plenum in the downcomer

참고문헌 (33)

  1. J. Sugimoto, "Experimental study of effect of initial clad temperature on reflood phenomena during PWR-LOCA", J. Nucl. Sci. Technol, 20(8), pp.645~657 (1983)
  2. R. P. Martin, "Progress in international best estimate plus uncertainty analysis methodologies", Nucl. Eng. Des, 374, pp.111033~ (2021)
  3. H. Luo, "Quantified PIRT and Uncertainty Quantification for Computer Code Validation", ~ (2012)
  4. W. Jaeger, "Uncertainty and sensitivity study in the frame of TRACE validation for reflood experiment", Nucl. Technol, 184(3), pp.333~350 (2017)
  5. Q. Xiong, "Global sensitivity analysis for nuclear reactor LBLOCA with timedependent outputs", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 221, pp.108337~ (2022)
  6. J. M. Yoo, "Analysis of the effect of liquid droplet models on the reflood heat transfer using the CUPID code", Nucl. Eng. Des, 354, pp.110148~ (2019)
  7. Q. Xiong, "Optimization of sensitivity analysis in best estimate plus uncertainty and the application to large break LOCA of a three-loop pressurized water reactor", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 126, pp.103396~ (2020)
  8. G. Perret, "Global sensitivity analysis and bayesian calibration on a series of reflood experiments with varying boundary conditions", Nucl. Technol, 208(4), pp.711~722 (2021)
  9. X. Wu, "A comprehensive survey of inverse uncertainty quantification of physical model parameters in nuclear system thermal–hydraulics codes", Nucl. Eng. Des, 384, pp.111460~ (2021)
  10. J. Yang, "Best estimate plus uncertainty analysis of a large break LOCA on generation III reactor with RELAP5", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 127, pp.326~340 (2019)
  11. M. Ionescu-Bujor, "A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems—I : deterministic methods", Nucl. Sci. Eng, 147, pp.189~203 (2004)
  12. D. G. Cacuci, "A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems—II : statistical methods", Nucl. Sci. Eng, 147, pp.204~217 (2004)
  13. D. Li, "Comparison of local and global sensitivity analysis methods and application to thermal hydraulic phenomena", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 158, pp.104612~ (2023)
  14. Q. Xiong, "Global sensitivity analysis of LOFT large break loss of coolant accident with optimized moment-independent method", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 139, pp.107289~ (2020)
  15. C. S. Brown, "Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis with CASL Core Simulator VERA-CS", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 95, pp.188~201 (2016)
  16. V. Nicoulaud-Gouin, "Sensitivity analysis in a radiological impact assessment of a nuclear power plant discharge. A comparison of the Morris, Spearman and Sobol’ approaches", J. Environ. Radioact, 242, pp.106770~ (2022)
  17. R. A. Shaw, "Phenomena Identification and Ranking Tables (PIRT) for LBLOCA", ~ (1987)
  18. L. Chen, "Development of multiphase subchannel code with new numerical method in COSINE code package", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 191, pp.109902~ (2023)
  19. W.R. Zwick, "A Comparison of Five Rules for Determining the Number of Components in Complex Patterns", ~ (1983)
  20. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, "W. K. H¨ardle", ~ (2003)
  21. E. C. Fieller, "Tests for rank correlation coefficients. I", Biometrika, 44, pp.470~481 (1957)
  22. C. Spearman, "The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman", Am. J. Psychol, 100(3–4), pp.441~471 (1987)
  23. T. W. Anderson, "A test of goodness of fit", J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 49, pp.765~769 (1954)
  24. T. W. Anderson, "Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness of fit" criteria based on stochastic processes", Ann. Math. Stat, 23, pp.193~212 (1952)
  25. P. Weiss, "UPTF experiment : a synopsis of full scale test results", Nucl. Eng. Des, 122, pp.219~234 (1990)
  26. P. S. Damerell, "Reactor Safety Issues Resolved by the 2D", 3D Program Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1993
  27. X. Li, "Analysis of RELAP5 prediction of countercurrent flow limitation in downcomer at upper plenum test facility", Prog. Nucl. Energy, 158, pp.104608~ (2023)
  28. P. Ihle, "Feba - flooding experiments with blocked arrays, Evaluation report", Test series V-VIII (1984) KFK-3659, ~ (1984)
  29. D. Wicaksono, "Global sensitivity analysis of transient code output applied to a reflood experiment model using the TRACE code", Nucl. Sci. Eng, 184(3), pp.400~429 (2017)
  30. A. Kovtonyuk, "PREMIUM BenchmarkPhase II: Identification of Influential Input Parameters" (2012)
  31. Z. J. A. Belmonte, "The acceptance of nuclear energy as an alternative source of energy among Generation Z in the Philippines : an extended theory of planned behavior approach", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 55(8), pp.3054~3070 (2023)
  32. M. S. Islam, "An empirical study of the risk-benefit perceptions between the nuclear and non-nuclear groups towards the nuclear power plant in Bangladesh", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 55(12), pp.4617~4627 (2023)
  33. S. -W. Kim, "PWSCC growth rate model of alloy 690 for head penetration nozzles of Korean PWRs", Nucl. Eng. Technol, 51(4), pp.1060~1068 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (49건)