Comparison of Revision Rates Due to Aseptic Loosening between High-Flex and Conventional Knee Prostheses
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate and compare the revision rate due to aseptic loosening between a high-flex prosthesis and a conventional prosthesis.Materials and Methods: Two thousand seventy-eight knees (1,377 patients) with at least 2 years of follow-up after total knee arthroplasty were reviewed. Two types of implants were selected (LPS-Flex and LPS, Zimmer) to compare revision and survival rates and sites of loosened prosthesis component. Results: The revision rate of the LPS-Flex (4.9%) was significantly higher than that of the conventional prosthesis (0.6%) (p<0.001). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 98.9%, 96.2% and 92.0%, respectively, for the LPS-Flex and 99.8%, 98.5% and 93.5%, respectively, for the LPS. The survival rate of the high-flex prosthesis was significantly lower than that of the conventional prosthesis, especially in the mid-term period (range, 5 to 10 years; p=0.002). The loosening rate of the femoral component was significantly higher in the LPS-Flex prosthesis (p=0.001). Conclusions: The LPS-Flex had a higher revision rate due to aseptic loosening than the LPS prosthesis in the large population series with a long follow-up. The LPS-Flex should be used carefully considering the risk of femoral component aseptic loosening in the mid-term (range, 5 to 10 years) follow-up period after initial operation.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate and compare the revision rate due to aseptic loosening between a high-flex prosthesis and a conventional prosthesis.Materials and Methods: Two thousand seventy-eight knees (1,377 patients) with at least 2 years of follow-up after total knee arthroplasty were reviewed. Two types of implants were selected (LPS-Flex and LPS, Zimmer) to compare revision and survival rates and sites of loosened prosthesis component. Results: The revision rate of the LPS-Flex (4.9%) was significantly higher than that of the conventional prosthesis (0.6%) (p<0.001). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 98.9%, 96.2% and 92.0%, respectively, for the LPS-Flex and 99.8%, 98.5% and 93.5%, respectively, for the LPS. The survival rate of the high-flex prosthesis was significantly lower than that of the conventional prosthesis, especially in the mid-term period (range, 5 to 10 years; p=0.002). The loosening rate of the femoral component was significantly higher in the LPS-Flex prosthesis (p=0.001). Conclusions: The LPS-Flex had a higher revision rate due to aseptic loosening than the LPS prosthesis in the large population series with a long follow-up. The LPS-Flex should be used carefully considering the risk of femoral component aseptic loosening in the mid-term (range, 5 to 10 years) follow-up period after initial operation.
참고문헌 (23)
- Endres S, "High-flexion versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a 5-year study", J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 19, pp.226~229 (2011)[DOI]
- Miner AL, "Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure?", J Arthroplasty, 18, pp.286~294 (2003)[DOI]
- Bellemans J, "Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84, pp.50~53 (2002)[DOI]
- Li G, "Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86, pp.1721~1729 (2004)
- Long WJ, "High-flexion total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 23(7 Suppl), pp.6~10 (2008)[DOI]
- Moro-oka T, "Patellar tracking and patellofemoral geometry in deep knee flexion", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (394), pp.161~168 (2002)
- Arirachakaran A, "Clinical outcomes after highflex versus conventional total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23, pp.1610~1621 (2015)[DOI]
- Fu H, "No clinical benefit of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.573~579 (2015)[DOI]
- Li C, "Do patients really gain outcome benefits when using the high-flex knee prostheses in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.580~586 (2015)[DOI]
- Nieuwenhuijse MJ, "Fixation of high-flexion total knee prostheses: five-year followup results of a four-arm randomized controlled clinical and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, pp.e1411~e1411 (2013)
- Radetzki F, "High flex total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study with results after 10 years", Acta Orthop Belg, 79, pp.536~540 (2013)
- 최영준, "고도굴곡형 인공관절을 이용한 슬관절 전치환술 후 조기에 발생한 무균성 해리의 양상", 대한정형외과학회지, 47(1), pp.35~40 (2012), 대한정형외과학회
- Han HS, "Brief followup report: does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty allow deep flexion safely in Asian patients?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.1492~1497 (2013)[DOI]
- Han HS, "High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.1457~1461 (2007)
- King TV, "Femoral component loosening in total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (194), pp.285~290 (1985)
- Ewald FC, "The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (248), pp.9~12 (1989)
- Insall JN, "Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (248), pp.13~14 (1989)
- Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33, pp.159~174 (1977)[DOI]
- Cho SD, "Three- to six-year follow-up results after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: can we allow passive deep knee bending?", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 19, pp.899~903 (2011)[DOI]
- Zelle J, "Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty promote early loosening of the femoral component?", J Orthop Res, 29, pp.976~983 (2011)[DOI]
- Ranawat CS, "Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (416), pp.174~176 (2003)
- Ritter MA, "High-flexion knee designs: more hype than hope? In the affirmative", J Arthroplasty, 21(4 Suppl 1), pp.40~41 (2006)[DOI]
- Nakayama K, "Contact stress at the post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87, pp.483~488 (2005)