본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Intraoperative Graft Isometry in Anatomic Single-­Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Intraoperative Graft Isometry in Anatomic Single­-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Little is known about the isometry of anatomic single-­bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel positions in vivo although it is closely related to graft tension throughout the range of motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraoperative graft isometry in anatomic single­-bundle ACL reconstruction in vivo. Materials and Methods: Graft length changes were assessed before bio­-screw fixation in the tibial tunnel by pulling the graft with tensions of 20 lbs and 30 lbs in full extension at flexion angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. Results: At the flexion angle of 30°, 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension showed –0.4 mm and –0.6 mm length changes, respectively. The greater the flexion angle of the knee, the shorter the graft length in the joint. At the flexion angles of 90° and 120°, there was significant difference in the graft length change between 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension. Conclusions: Anatomic single-­bundle ACL reconstruction was non-­isometric. The graft length was the longest in full extension. The tension of graft became loose in flexion. At the flexion angles of 90° and 120°, there was significant difference in the graft length change between 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension.

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about the isometry of anatomic single-­bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel positions in vivo although it is closely related to graft tension throughout the range of motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraoperative graft isometry in anatomic single­-bundle ACL reconstruction in vivo. Materials and Methods: Graft length changes were assessed before bio­-screw fixation in the tibial tunnel by pulling the graft with tensions of 20 lbs and 30 lbs in full extension at flexion angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. Results: At the flexion angle of 30°, 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension showed –0.4 mm and –0.6 mm length changes, respectively. The greater the flexion angle of the knee, the shorter the graft length in the joint. At the flexion angles of 90° and 120°, there was significant difference in the graft length change between 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension. Conclusions: Anatomic single-­bundle ACL reconstruction was non-­isometric. The graft length was the longest in full extension. The tension of graft became loose in flexion. At the flexion angles of 90° and 120°, there was significant difference in the graft length change between 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Lee DH, "Comparison of femur tunnel aperture location in patients undergoing transtibial and anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24, pp.3713~3721 (2016)[DOI]
  2. Chung JY, "Anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel by a modified transtibial technique using a large-offset femoral tunnel guide: a cadaveric study", Knee, 23, pp.659~665 (2016)[DOI]
  3. Lee MC, "Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 23, pp.771~778 (2007)[DOI]
  4. van Eck CF, "Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart", Arthroscopy, 26, pp.258~268 (2010)[DOI]
  5. Chechik O, "An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices", Int Orthop, 37, pp.201~206 (2013)[DOI]
  6. Yasuda K, "Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science", Am J Sports Med, 39, pp.1789~1799 (2011)[DOI]
  7. Abebe ES, "The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", J Biomech, 44, pp.924~929 (2011)[DOI]
  8. Lee JS, "How isometric are the anatomic femoral tunnel and the anterior tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.1504~1512 (2012)[DOI]
  9. Young Won Ko, "The Correlation of Tunnel Position, Orientation and Tunnel Enlargement in Outside-in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 27(4), pp.247~254 (2015), 대한슬관절학회
  10. 안진환, "Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of Tunnel Location during Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Transtibial and 2-Incision Tibial Tunnel-Independent Techniques", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 5(1), pp.26~35 (2013), 대한정형외과학회
  11. Bernard M, "Femoral insertion of the ACL: radiographic quadrant method", Am J Knee Surg, 10, pp.14~21 (1997)
  12. Hoser C, "Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 13, pp.256~262 (2005)[DOI]
  13. Fernandes TL, "3D computer tomography for measurement of femoral position in acl reconstruction", Acta Ortop Bras, 23, pp.11~15 (2015)[DOI]
  14. Tsuda E, "Tunnel position and relationship to postoperative knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique", Am J Sports Med, 38, pp.698~706 (2010)[DOI]
  15. Kim DH, "Reliability of 3-dimensional computed tomography for application of the bernard quadrant method in femoral tunnel position evaluation after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 32, pp.1660~1666 (2016)[DOI]
  16. Colombet P, "Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study", Arthroscopy, 22, pp.984~992 (2006)[DOI]
  17. Zantop T, "Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings", Am J Sports Med, 36, pp.65~72 (2008)[DOI]
  18. Forsythe B, "The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, pp.1418~1426 (2010)[DOI]
  19. Smith JO, "Femoral and tibial tunnel positioning on graft isometry in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study", J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 22, pp.318~324 (2014)[DOI]
  20. Lubowitz JH, "Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22, pp.1190~1195 (2014)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Anatomic Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Low Accessory Anteromedial Portal Technique: An In Vivo 3D CT Study김하용, 양대석, 이광원, 지용주, 최원식, 황윤섭대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2014 · 제26권 제2호The Correlation of Tunnel Position, Orientation and Tunnel Enlargement in Outside-in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction유재두, In Woo Kim, Seung Jun Rhee, Young Won Ko대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2015 · 제27권 제4호Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Tunnel Location and Angle in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Anteromedial Portal and Outside-in Techniques김강일, 배성혜, 배찬일, 이상학대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2017 · 제29권 제1호Kinematic Analysis of Five Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction TechniquesAli Hosseini, Guoan Li, Hemanth R Gadikota, Peter Asnis대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2015 · 제27권 제2호Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis문동규, 유준일, 황선철, Cho Sung-Hee, Kim Kun-Tae, Oh Jin-Young, Park Young-Jin, Won Hee-Chan대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2020 · 제32권 Clinical Results Comparing Transtibial Technique and Outside in Technique in Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction김전교, 김창완, 서승석, 진성엽대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2013 · 제25권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)