Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Tunnel Location and Angle in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Anteromedial Portal and Outside-in Techniques
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the geometry and position of the femoral tunnel between the anteromedial portal (AMP) and outside-in (OI) techniques after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 82 patients undergoing single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts using either the AMP (n=40) or OI (n=42) technique. The locations of the tunnel apertures were assessed by postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging. The femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel aperture shape, femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were also measured. results: The mean femoral tunnel position parallel to the Blumensaat line was more caudally positioned in the AMP group than in the OI group (p=0.025) The mean femoral graft angle in the OI group (99.6°±7.1°) was significantly more acute than that of the AMP group (108.9°±10.2°, p<0.001). The mean height/width ratio of the AMP group (1.21±0.20) was significantly more ellipsoidal than that of the OI group (1.07±0.09, p<0.001). conclusions: The mean femoral tunnel position was significantly shallower in the AMP technique than in the OI technique. The OI technique might be more disadvantageous than the AMP technique in terms of the more acute bending angle.
Abstract
purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the geometry and position of the femoral tunnel between the anteromedial portal (AMP) and outside-in (OI) techniques after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 82 patients undergoing single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts using either the AMP (n=40) or OI (n=42) technique. The locations of the tunnel apertures were assessed by postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging. The femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel aperture shape, femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were also measured. results: The mean femoral tunnel position parallel to the Blumensaat line was more caudally positioned in the AMP group than in the OI group (p=0.025) The mean femoral graft angle in the OI group (99.6°±7.1°) was significantly more acute than that of the AMP group (108.9°±10.2°, p<0.001). The mean height/width ratio of the AMP group (1.21±0.20) was significantly more ellipsoidal than that of the OI group (1.07±0.09, p<0.001). conclusions: The mean femoral tunnel position was significantly shallower in the AMP technique than in the OI technique. The OI technique might be more disadvantageous than the AMP technique in terms of the more acute bending angle.
참고문헌 (29)
- Chang MJ, "Anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique for creating femoral tunnels in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions", Arthroscopy, 29, pp.1533~1539 (2013)
- Shin YS, "Location of the femoral tunnel aperture in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : comparison of the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.2533~2539 (2013)
- Takeda Y, "Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography", Arthroscopy, 29, pp.195~204 (2013)
- Ahn JH, "Creation of an anatomic femoral tunnel with minimal damage to the remnant bundle in remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an outside-in technique", Arthrosc Tech, 3, pp.e175~e179 (2014)
- Gelber PE, "Effectiveness of a footprint guide to establish an anatomic femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : computed tomography evaluation in a cadaveric model", Arthroscopy, 27, pp.817~824 (2011)
- Chang CB, "Comparisons of femoral tunnel position and length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques", Arthroscopy, 27, pp.1389~1394 (2011)
- Lubowitz JH, "Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket : pitfalls and solutions", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.95~101 (2009)
- Kim JG, "Femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel geometry of transportal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : an in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.1682~1694 (2012)
- de Abreu-e-Silva GM, "Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23, pp.770~776 (2015)
- 안진환, "Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of Tunnel Location during Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Transtibial and 2-Incision Tibial Tunnel-Independent Techniques", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 5(1), pp.26~35 (2013), 대한정형외과학회
- Sung Rak Lee, "Evaluation of Femoral Tunnel Positioning Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Radiographs after Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Modified Transtibial Technique", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 5(3), pp.188~194 (2013), 대한정형외과학회
- Bernard M, "Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty : a radiologic measuring method(quadrant method)", Unfallchirurg, 99, pp.332~340 (1996)
- Fleiss JL, "Statistical methods for rates and proportions", pp.598~626 (2003), John Wiley
- Ho JY, "Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.464~472 (2009)
- Larson AI, "Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.972~979 (2012)
- Bird JH, "Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis", Arthroscopy, 27, pp.1259~1267 (2011)
- Driscoll MD, "Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a biomechanical study", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.1481~1489 (2012)
- Tsukada H, "Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints", J Orthop Sci, 13, pp.122~129 (2008)
- Lubowitz JH, "Technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket : optimizing femoral footprint anatomic restoration using outside-in drilling", Arthroscopy, 29, pp.522~528 (2013)
- Robin BN, "Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a systematic review", Arthroscopy, 31, pp.1412~1417 (2015)
- Kopf S, "Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, pp.1427~1431 (2010)
- Lee YS, "Comparative analysis of femoral tunnels between outside-in and transtibial double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a 3-dimensional computed tomography study", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.1417~1423 (2012)
- Robert HE, "Coverage of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint using 3 different approaches in single-bundle reconstruction : a cadaveric study analyzed by 3-dimensional computed tomography", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.2375~2383 (2013)
- Kim JG, "Computed tomography analysis of the femoral tunnel position and aperture shape of transportal and outside-in ACL reconstruction: do different anatomic reconstruction techniques create similar femoral tunnels?", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.2512~2520 (2013)
- Park JS, "Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques", Arthroscopy, 31, pp.83~91 (2015)
- Lubowitz JH, "Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length : cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique", Arthroscopy, 26, pp.1357~1362 (2010)
- Nakamura M, "Potential risks of femoral tunnel drilling through the far anteromedial portal : a cadaveric study", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.481~487 (2009)
- 서승석, "Clinical Results Comparing Transtibial Technique and Outside in Technique in Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 25(3), pp.133~140 (2013), 대한슬관절학회
- Gadikota HR, "The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint", Am J Sports Med, 40, pp.882~888 (2012)
