Open Posterior Approach versus Arthroscopic Suture Fixation for Displaced Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures: Systematic Review
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes between the open posterior approach and arthroscopic suture fixation for displaced posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures.Methods: A literature search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria were as follows: papers written in English on displaced PCL avulsion fractures, clinical trial(s) with clear description of surgical technique, adult subjects, a followup longer than 12 months and modified Coleman methodology score (CMS) more than 60 points.Results: Twelve studies were included with a mean CMS value of 72.4 (standard deviation, 7.6). Overall, 134 patients underwent the open posterior approach with a minimum 12month followup, and 174 patients underwent arthroscopic suture fixation. At final followup, the range of Lysholm score was 85–100 for the open approach and 80–100 for the arthroscopic approach. Patients who were rated as normal or nearly normal in the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee assessment were 92%–100% for the open approach and 90%–100% for the arthroscopic approach. The range of sidetoside difference was 0–5 mm for both approaches.Conclusions: Both arthroscopic and open methods for the treatment of PCL tibialside avulsion injuries resulted in comparably good clinical outcomes, radiological healing, and stable knees.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes between the open posterior approach and arthroscopic suture fixation for displaced posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures.Methods: A literature search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria were as follows: papers written in English on displaced PCL avulsion fractures, clinical trial(s) with clear description of surgical technique, adult subjects, a followup longer than 12 months and modified Coleman methodology score (CMS) more than 60 points.Results: Twelve studies were included with a mean CMS value of 72.4 (standard deviation, 7.6). Overall, 134 patients underwent the open posterior approach with a minimum 12month followup, and 174 patients underwent arthroscopic suture fixation. At final followup, the range of Lysholm score was 85–100 for the open approach and 80–100 for the arthroscopic approach. Patients who were rated as normal or nearly normal in the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee assessment were 92%–100% for the open approach and 90%–100% for the arthroscopic approach. The range of sidetoside difference was 0–5 mm for both approaches.Conclusions: Both arthroscopic and open methods for the treatment of PCL tibialside avulsion injuries resulted in comparably good clinical outcomes, radiological healing, and stable knees.
참고문헌 (21)
- Sabat D, "Displaced posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures : a retrospective comparative study between open posterior approach and arthroscopic singletunnel suture fixation", Arthroscopy, 32, pp.44~53 (2016)
- Strobel MJ, "Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage lesions in posterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient knees", Arthroscopy, 19, pp.262~268 (2003)
- Chiarapattanakom P, "Isolated PCl avulsion from the tibial attachment: residual laxity and function of the knee after screw fixation", J Med Assoc Thai, 92(Suppl 6), pp.S181~S188 (2009)
- Yang CK, "Surgical treatment of avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament and postoperative management", J Trauma, 54, pp.516~519 (2003)
- Huang W, "Anterior arthroscopic-assisted fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures", Eur J Med Res, 20, pp.88~ (2015)
- Gwinner C, "All-arthroscopic treatment of tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament", GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW, 5, pp.Doc02~ (2016)
- Zhao J, "Arthroscopic treatment of acute tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament with suture fixation technique through Y-shaped bone tunnels", Arthroscopy, 22, pp.172~181 (2006)
- Gui J, "Single-tunnel suture fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture", Arthroscopy, 25, pp.78~85 (2009)
- Chen SY, "Arthroscopic suture fixation for avulsion fractures in the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament", Arthroscopy, 28, pp.1454~1463 (2012)
- Chen LB, "Arthroscopic fixation of an avulsion fracture of the tibia involving the posterior cruciate ligament : a modified technique in a series of 22 cases", Bone Joint J, 97, pp.1220~1225 (2015)
- Sasaki SU, "Open screw fixation versus arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries : a mechanical comparison", Arthroscopy, 23, pp.1226~1230 (2007)
- Coleman BD, "Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy : clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies : Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group", Scand J Med Sci Sports, 10, pp.2~11 (2000)
- Chen W, "Effects of microendoscopy-assisted reduction and screw fixation through a single mini-incision on posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 132, pp.429~435 (2012)
- Inoue M, "Primary repair of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture : the effect of occult injury in the midsubstance on postoperative instability", Am J Sports Med, 32, pp.1230~1237 (2004)
- Singer MS, "Minimally invasive open reduction and fixation of avulsed tibial insertion of posterior cruciate ligament", Eur Orthop Traumatol, 6, pp.357~361 (2015)
- Pardiwala DN, "Paper 133: comparison of open versus arthroscopic fixation for isolated PCL tibial bony avulsions: a prospective randomized study with minimum 2 year follow-up", Arthroscopy, 28(9 Suppl), pp.e413~e414 (2012)
- Abbott LC, "Surgical approaches to the knee joint", J Bone Joint Surg, 27, pp.277~310 (1945)
- Trickey EL, "Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment of early injuries and reconstruction of late instability", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (147), pp.76~81 (1980)
- Burks RT, "A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (254), pp.216~219 (1990)
- Janousek AT, "Posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint", Sports Med, 28, pp.429~441 (1999)
- Schulz MS, "Epidemiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 123, pp.186~191 (2003)