Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This meta-analysis evaluated the benefits of single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) surgical techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) in terms of clinical outcomes. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published until September 2016. Clinical outcomes of both techniques were evaluated using Lysholm knee function scores, Tegner activity scores, side-to-side differences, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective grades. The results are presented as a risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes and a weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. There were no significant differences in the Lysholm knee function scores (WMD=1.63; 95% CI, 0.00 to 3.27; I2=0%), Tegner activity scores (WMD=0.17; 95% CI, –0.08 to 0.43; I2=20%), side-to-side differences (WMD=–0.97; 95% CI, –2.41 to 0.47; I2=78%), and IKDC objective grades (RR=1.18; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.39; I2=0%) at the final follow-up. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that both SB and DB techniques for PCLR are comparable in terms of restoration of knee stability and improvement of knee function. However, it is still unclear which technique yields better clinical outcomes. To verify and further corroborate our results, more larger-scale, high-quality RCTs are encouraged.
Abstract
Purpose: This meta-analysis evaluated the benefits of single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) surgical techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) in terms of clinical outcomes. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published until September 2016. Clinical outcomes of both techniques were evaluated using Lysholm knee function scores, Tegner activity scores, side-to-side differences, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective grades. The results are presented as a risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes and a weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. There were no significant differences in the Lysholm knee function scores (WMD=1.63; 95% CI, 0.00 to 3.27; I2=0%), Tegner activity scores (WMD=0.17; 95% CI, –0.08 to 0.43; I2=20%), side-to-side differences (WMD=–0.97; 95% CI, –2.41 to 0.47; I2=78%), and IKDC objective grades (RR=1.18; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.39; I2=0%) at the final follow-up. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that both SB and DB techniques for PCLR are comparable in terms of restoration of knee stability and improvement of knee function. However, it is still unclear which technique yields better clinical outcomes. To verify and further corroborate our results, more larger-scale, high-quality RCTs are encouraged.
참고문헌 (24)
- Fanelli GC, "Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients : part II", Arthroscopy, 11, pp.526~529 (1995)
- Amis AA, "Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 14, pp.257~263 (2006)
- Mauro CS, "Double-bundle PCL and posterolateral corner reconstruction components are codominant", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, pp.2247~2254 (2008)
- Baker CL Jr, "Acute combined posterior cruciate and posterolateral instability of the knee", Am J Sports Med, 12, pp.204~208 (1984)
- Covey DC, "Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament : anatomic and biomechanical considerations", Am J Sports Med, 24, pp.740~746 (1996)
- Hou JH, "Single-and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under arthroscopy : a prospective cohort study", Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 19, pp.3271~3275 (2015)
- Markolf KL, "Biomechanical studies of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, pp.1788~1794 (2006)
- Markolf KL, "Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation", Am J Sports Med, 38, pp.1141~1146 (2010)
- Harner CD, "Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 28, pp.144~151 (2000)
- Whiddon DR, "Double compared with single-bundle open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaver model", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, pp.1820~1829 (2008)
- Bergfeld JA, "A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single-and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques", Am J Sports Med, 33, pp.976~981 (2005)
- Apsingi S, "Control of laxity in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency : comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with modified Larson posterolateral corner reconstruction", Am J Sports Med, 36, pp.487~494 (2008)
- Apsingi S, "The role of PCL reconstruction in knees with combined PCL and posterolateral corner deficiency", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16, pp.104~111 (2008)
- Jadad AR, "Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?", Control Clin Trials, 17, pp.1~12 (1996)
- Wang CJ, "Arthroscopic single-versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft", Injury, 35, pp.1293~1299 (2004)
- Yoon KH, "A prospective randomized study comparing arthroscopic single-bundle and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions preserving remnant fibers", Am J Sports Med, 39, pp.474~480 (2011)
- Li Y, "Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft : a prospective, randomized study", Arthroscopy, 30, pp.695~700 (2014)
- Zhao JX, "Outcome of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the single-versus double bundle technique : a meta-analysis", J Int Med Res, 43, pp.149~160 (2015)
- Mannor DA, "Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vitro analysis of graft placement and tension", Am J Sports Med, 28, pp.833~845 (2000)
- Race A, "PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.173~179 (1998)
- Shearn JT, "Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how bundle tension depends on femoral placement", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86, pp.1262~1270 (2004)
- 이동영, "Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies on Anatomic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Landmarks in Anatomic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 26(4), pp.191~198 (2014), 대한슬관절학회
- 이상학, "Remnant Preservation is Helpful to Obtain Good Clinical Results in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Clinical Results of Three Techniques", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 5(4), pp.278~286 (2013), 대한정형외과학회
- Song JG, "Clinical outcome of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without remnant preservation", Arthroscopy, 31, pp.1796~1806 (2015)