본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A prospective randomized study of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with adjustable- versus fixed-loop device for femoral side fixation

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Suspensory devices are extensively used in the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. They include fixed- and adjustable-loop devices. There are only a few studies comparing the efficacy of these two devices in the available literature. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between the adjustable-loop device (group I) and fixed-loop device (group II).This was a prospective randomized study. Both groups were equivalent in demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables. Twenty-three patients underwent femoral side graft fixation with adjustable-loop and 20 with fixed-loop devices. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Assessment of clinical outcome was done with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and knee stability tests (Lachman test and pivot shift test). Patient evaluation was performed preoperatively and finally postoperatively 2 years after surgery. Postoperative IKDC scores of group I and II were 91.9 ± 3.6 and 91.5 ± 3.6, respectively, and Lysholm scores were 91.0 ± 3.6 and 91.4 ± 3.5, respectively, after 2 years; however, the difference in the outcomes was statistically insignificant ( p > 0.05). Twenty patients (87%) in group I and 17 patients (85%) in group II had a negative Lachman test ( p = 0.8). Twenty-two patients (95.7%) in group I and 19 patients (95%) in group II had a negative pivot shift test ( p = 0.9). ACL reconstruction with fixed- and adjustable-loop suspensory devices for graft fixation gives equivalent and satisfactory clinical results.1.

Abstract

Suspensory devices are extensively used in the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. They include fixed- and adjustable-loop devices. There are only a few studies comparing the efficacy of these two devices in the available literature. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between the adjustable-loop device (group I) and fixed-loop device (group II).This was a prospective randomized study. Both groups were equivalent in demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables. Twenty-three patients underwent femoral side graft fixation with adjustable-loop and 20 with fixed-loop devices. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Assessment of clinical outcome was done with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and knee stability tests (Lachman test and pivot shift test). Patient evaluation was performed preoperatively and finally postoperatively 2 years after surgery. Postoperative IKDC scores of group I and II were 91.9 ± 3.6 and 91.5 ± 3.6, respectively, and Lysholm scores were 91.0 ± 3.6 and 91.4 ± 3.5, respectively, after 2 years; however, the difference in the outcomes was statistically insignificant ( p > 0.05). Twenty patients (87%) in group I and 17 patients (85%) in group II had a negative Lachman test ( p = 0.8). Twenty-two patients (95.7%) in group I and 19 patients (95%) in group II had a negative pivot shift test ( p = 0.9). ACL reconstruction with fixed- and adjustable-loop suspensory devices for graft fixation gives equivalent and satisfactory clinical results.1.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Fu FH, "Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations", Am J Sports Med, 28, pp.124~130 (2000)
  2. Zeng C, "Methods and devices for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013)[DOI]
  3. Eguchi A, "Mechanical properties of suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : comparison of the fixed-length loop device versus the adjustable-length loop device", Knee, 21, pp.743~748 (2014)
  4. Barrow AE, "Femoral suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : do adjustable loops lengthen?", Am J Sports Med, 42, pp.343~349 (2014)
  5. Lubowitz JH, "All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique : second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, 27, pp.717~727 (2011)
  6. Choi N-H, "Clinical and radiological outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions : comparison between fixed-loop and adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices", Am J Sports Med, 45, pp.826~831 (2017)
  7. Johnson JS, "A biomechanical comparison of femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under high loads", Am J Sports Med, 43, pp.154~160 (2015)
  8. Petre BM, "Femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a comparative biomechanical study", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.416~422 (2013)
  9. Noonan BC, "Biomechanical evaluation of an adjustable loop suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation device : the value of retensioning and knot tying", Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, 32, pp.2050~2059 (2016)
  10. Ranjan R, "In vivo comparison of a fixed loop(EndoButton CL)with an adjustable loop(TightRope RT)device for femoral fixation of the graft in ACL reconstruction : a prospective randomized study and a literature review", J Orthop Surg, 26 (2018)
  11. 안진환, "Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Results of Outside-in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Fixed- and Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Fixation", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 10(2), pp.157~166 (2018), 대한정형외과학회
  12. Lanzetti RM, "Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study", Knee, 23, pp.837~841 (2016)
  13. Sheth H, "Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using fixed suspensory device versus adjustable suspensory device for femoral side graft fixation : what are the outcomes?", J Clin Orthop Trauma, 10, pp.138~142 (2019)
  14. Kohn MD, "Classifications in brief : Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis", Clin Orthop, 474(8), pp.1886~1893 (2016)
  15. Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan, "Does Second-Generation Suspensory Implant Negate Tunnel Widening of First-Generation Implant Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 30(4), pp.341~347 (2018), 대한슬관절학회
  16. Gamboa JT, "Graft retensioning technique using an adjustable-loop fixation device in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", Arthrosc Tech, 7(2), pp.e185~e191 (2018)
  17. Collins N, "Measures of knee function", Arthritis Care Res, 63, pp.S208~S228 (2011)
  18. Mulligan EP, "The reliability and diagnostic accuracy of assessing the translation endpoint during the Lachman test", Int J Sports Phys Ther, 10, pp.52~61 (2015)
  19. 서승석, "Clinical Results Comparing Transtibial Technique and Outside in Technique in Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 25(3), pp.133~140 (2013), 대한슬관절학회
  20. Asif N, "Prediction of quadruple hamstring graft diameter for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by anthropometric measurements", Indian J Orthop, 50, pp.49~54 (2016)
  21. Pocock S, "A practical approach", pp.123~141 (1998), Wiley
  22. Julious SA, "Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data", Stat Med, 23(12), pp.1921~1986 (2004)
  23. Tsoukas D, "No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24(9), pp.2953~2959 (2016)
  24. Boyle MJ, "Does adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspension loosen after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A retrospective comparative study", Knee, 22, pp.304~308 (2015)
  25. Lubowitz J, "Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length : cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique", Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, 26, pp.1357~1362 (2010)
  26. Geethan Iyyampillai, "Determinants of Femoral Tunnel Length in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: CT Analysis of the Influence of Tunnel Orientation on the Length", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 25(4), pp.207~214 (2013), 대한슬관절학회
  27. Kim S-H, "Optimal condition to create femoral tunnel considering combined influence of knee flexion and transverse drill angle in anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction using medial portal technique: 3D simulation study", BioMed Res Int (2018)[DOI]
  28. Kadija M, "Length of the femoral tunnel in anatomic ACL reconstruction comparison of three techniques", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25, pp.1606~1612 (2015)
  29. Wein F, "Anteversion and length of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction : in-vivo comparison between rigid and flexible instrumentation", J Exp Orthop, 6, pp.26~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

Does Second-Generation Suspensory Implant Negate Tunnel Widening of First-Generation Implant Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?Ajay Singh, Balaji Sambandam, Ramakanth Rajagopalakrishnan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제4호ACL Reconstruction with Autologous Hamstring Tendon: Comparison of Short Term Clinical Results between Rigid-fix and PINN-ACL Cross Pin서승석, Chang-Wan Kim, Sang-Yeong Choi, Tae-Seok Nam대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2011 · 제23권 제4호Comparison between Single and Dual Femoral Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Hamstring AutograftJin Goo Kim, Nam Ki Kim, Yong Seuk Lee대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2011 · 제23권 제3호Outcome Differences of Remnant-Preserving versus Non-Preserving Methods in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis with Subgroup analysis권세원, 김용범, 김준범, 서기원, 원성훈, 최형석, Byung-Il Lee, Jae-Hyung Kim, Kyung-Dae Min, Su Yeon Park대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2020 · 제32권 Arthroscopic Control for Safe and Secure Seating of Suspensory Devices for Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three Different Techniques강서규, 이용석대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2017 · 제29권 제1호A Comparison between Clinical Results of Selective Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction김윤상, 서영진, 송시영, 양철중, 유연식, 하종문연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (46건)