본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Radiographic measurement of the congruence angle according to Merchant: validity, reproducibility, and limits

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

The objective of this study was to analyze the intra- and interobserver variability of this measurement according to a strict methodology and on a representative sample of the general population, as well as to identify the possible difficulties of measurement in case of patellar or trochlear dysplasia. This observational study involved radiographic analysis by three independent observers of a total of 50 patients who had a loaded patellofemoral X-ray taken with the knee flexed to 45°. An initial reading was taken to measure the angle of the trochlear sulcus, the Merchant angle, and to classify the knees according to a possible trochlear dysplasia and/or patellar dysplasia according to Wiberg. A second measurement was then performed to analyze intraobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement was measured on all radiographic measurements ( n = 100). The Merchant patellofemoral congruence angle showed good intraobserver concordance ranging from 0.925 (95% CI 0.868–0.957) to 0.942 (95% CI 0.898–0.967), as well as interobserver concordance ranging from 0.795 (95% CI 0.695–0.862) to 0.914 (95% CI 0.872–0.942). Poor results were found in terms of interobserver concordance on the measurement of the Merchant angle in case of stage 3 Wiberg patella ranging from 0.282 (95% CI −0.920 to 0.731) to 0.611 (95% CI 0.226–0.892).Congruence angle is one of most commonly used measurements for patellar tracking. However, the convexity of the patellar surface makes it difficult to identify the patellar apex on its intraarticular facet, making the measurement of the Merchant congruence angle unreliable and not very reproducible in cases of stage 3 Wiberg patella. Registration N°IRB 2021/139

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the intra- and interobserver variability of this measurement according to a strict methodology and on a representative sample of the general population, as well as to identify the possible difficulties of measurement in case of patellar or trochlear dysplasia. This observational study involved radiographic analysis by three independent observers of a total of 50 patients who had a loaded patellofemoral X-ray taken with the knee flexed to 45°. An initial reading was taken to measure the angle of the trochlear sulcus, the Merchant angle, and to classify the knees according to a possible trochlear dysplasia and/or patellar dysplasia according to Wiberg. A second measurement was then performed to analyze intraobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement was measured on all radiographic measurements ( n = 100). The Merchant patellofemoral congruence angle showed good intraobserver concordance ranging from 0.925 (95% CI 0.868–0.957) to 0.942 (95% CI 0.898–0.967), as well as interobserver concordance ranging from 0.795 (95% CI 0.695–0.862) to 0.914 (95% CI 0.872–0.942). Poor results were found in terms of interobserver concordance on the measurement of the Merchant angle in case of stage 3 Wiberg patella ranging from 0.282 (95% CI −0.920 to 0.731) to 0.611 (95% CI 0.226–0.892).Congruence angle is one of most commonly used measurements for patellar tracking. However, the convexity of the patellar surface makes it difficult to identify the patellar apex on its intraarticular facet, making the measurement of the Merchant congruence angle unreliable and not very reproducible in cases of stage 3 Wiberg patella. Registration N°IRB 2021/139

참고문헌 (26)

  1. McCrum E, "Imaging of patellofemoral instability", Clin Sports Med, 40(4), pp.693~712 (2021)
  2. White AE, "Radiologic measurements in the assessment of patellar instability : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Orthop J Sports Med, 9(5) (2021)
  3. Drew BT, "Which patellofemoral joint imaging features are associated with patellofemoral pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis", Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 24(2), pp.224~236 (2016)
  4. Mehl J, "Association between patellar cartilage defects and patellofemoral geometry : a matched-pair MRI comparison of patients with and without isolated patellar cartilage defects", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24(3), pp.838~846 (2016)
  5. Swarup I, "Patellar instability treated with distal femoral osteotomy", Knee, 24(3), pp.608~614 (2017)
  6. Barnavon T, "Medial closing-wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy:symptoms and functional impact in cases of associated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. A two-year follow-up prospective pilot study", Knee, 27(3), pp.615~623 (2020)
  7. Zhang H, "Clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with suture fixation of the gracilis tendon via transosseous tunnels", Orthop J Sports Med, 8(2) (2020)
  8. Cregar WM, "Inconsistencies in reporting risk factors for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction failure : a systematic review", Am J Sports Med, 50(3), pp.867~877 (2022)
  9. Merchant AC, "Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 56(7), pp.1391~1396 (1974)
  10. Merchant AC, "Classification of patellofemoral disorders", Arthroscopy, 4(4), pp.235~240 (1988)
  11. Merchant AC, "Patellofemoral imaging", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 389, pp.15~21 (2001)
  12. Smith TO, "The reliability and validity of radiological assessment for patellar instability. A systematic review and meta-analysis", Skeletal Radiol, 40(4), pp.399~414 (2011)
  13. Nunnally JC, "Psychometric Theory" (1994), MsGraw-Hill
  14. Lee KW, "Usefulness of three-dimensional computed tomography for patellofemoral measurement", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 30, pp.1423~ (2021)
  15. Ye Q, "Patellar instability : the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging measurement parameters", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20(1), pp.317~ (2019)
  16. Schutzer SF, "The evaluation of patellofemoral pain using computerized tomography. A preliminary study", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 204, pp.286~293 (1986)
  17. Laurin CA, "The abnormal lateral patellofemoral angle : a diagnostic roentgenographic sign of recurrent patellar subluxation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60(1), pp.55~60 (1978)
  18. Dai Y, "Association of patellofemoral morphology and alignment with the radiographic severity of patellofemoral osteoarthritis", J Orthop Surg Res, 16(1), pp.548~ (2021)
  19. Gharaibeh MA, "Evaluation of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty : validation of the weight bearing merchant radiographic view", Knee, 25(6), pp.1262~1271 (2018)
  20. Brossmann J, "Patellar tracking patterns during active and passive knee extension : evaluation with motion-triggered cine MR imaging", Radiology, 187(1), pp.205~212 (1993)
  21. Powers CM, "Patellofemoral kinematics during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee extension in persons with lateral subluxation of the patella : a preliminary study", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 33(11), pp.677~685 (2003)
  22. McWalter EJ, "The effect of load magnitude on three-dimensional patellar kinematics in vivo", J Biomech, 43(10), pp.1890~1897 (2010)
  23. Kim T-H, "Discrepancies of patellofemoral indices between supine and standing merchant views", Knee Surg Relat Res, 26(1), pp.20~26 (2014)
  24. Nord A, "Axial knee radiographs : consistency across clinic sites", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22(10), pp.2401~2407 (2014)
  25. Smith TO, "The intra-and inter-rater reliability of X-ray radiological measurements for patellar instability", Knee, 20(2), pp.133~138 (2013)
  26. Nicolaas L, "Patellofemoral evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging in 51 knees of asymptomatic subjects", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 19(10), pp.1735~1739 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)