본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명작의 탄생: 20세기 석굴암의 신화

The Birth of a Masterpiece: The Myth of Seokguram in the 20th Century

5

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류미술

초록

석굴암은 어떻게 명작이 되었을까? 본 논문은 조선시대까지 선비, 묵객들이 유람하던 경승지였던 석굴암이 이전과는 다른 감상의 대상이 되어 민족의 명작이 된 과정을 고찰한 글이다. 일제강점기에 새로이 문화재라는 위치에 놓인 석굴암은 조선 민족의 우수성을 보여주는 상징으로 조선미술사의 핵심이 되었다. 일제가 일본어 교과서에 석굴암을 실은 이후, 현대까지 각종 교과서에 실린 석굴암에 대한 감상문은 민족의 정체성을 확립하고, 신생 독립국가 대한민국의 민족정신을 고취시키는 명작으로 교육되었다.

Abstract

How did Seokguram become a Masterpiece? This research argues that the idea of Seok-Gul-Am as a masterpiece was not developed a priori. The historical value of the Seokguram Grotto in Korean art history is undeniable. Seokguram has been well acknowledged for its architectural and technical excellence not to mention its artistic value. However, its significance may have not been recognized properly if no one had paid any attention to it. It was during the Japanese colonial period when Seokguram earned its status as masterpiece and its historical importance was highly emphasized. It is interesting to note that the people who made Seokguram the most representative masterwork and glorious monument of Korean Buddhist art were not Korean but Japanese. However, in the 1930s, Korean intellectuals began to glorify Seokguram as their proud cultural heritage. For them, Seokguram was the historical monument embodying national essence and spirit. As a result, Seokguram came to be designated as national masterwork. In order to educate Korean people as Japanese civilians, Imperial Japan included discussions and photos of Seokguram in Japanese school textbooks. The Republic of Korea, a newly established nation, also made efforts to highlight the significance of Seokguram in school textbooks for Korean language and Korean history classes. Although school curriculums have been revised many times, the significance of Seokguram as one of the greatest masterpieces in Korean art that represents national pride and spirit has not been changed. What is the significance of the facts that the writings about Seokguram have mostly been included in Korean language textbooks and that these writings are, in nature, emotional literary works rather than scholarly accounts? This has mainly been influenced by the textbook compliers who took nationalist approaches to the value of Seokguram. For them, Seokguram was the most important symbolic capital evoking the glorious past of the nation. As a result, the historical and art historical meanings of Seokguram had rarely been discussed. Due to this fervor of ethnic nationalism coupled with the dominance of political authoritarianism, Seokguram was used as a means of promoting national consciousness and identity in educational fields in Korea. Since the 1990s, when the ideological conflicts of the Cold War era came to an end, writings about Seokguram have been hardly seen in newly revised textbooks. This phenomenon coincided with the situation of the period when world-wide globalization was accelerated and fervent nationalism lost its appeal. During the 1950s when the Korea was under the tight control of Japanese influence, and the 1970s, when the Cold War between South and North Korea was intensified, both countries asserted the legitimacy of their own nations. Until the 1970’s when nationalism was emphasized and the 1980’s when the slogan of “our own” was overstressed, the education of ethnic nationalism through textbooks was fully devoted to highlighting Seokguram as national treasure. In the nationalist education system, Seokguram stood somewhere between a masterpiece and an ideological product.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 강희정, "식민지 조선의 表象: 석굴암의 公論化", 동악미술사학, (10), pp.115~135 (2009), 동악미술사학회
  2. 강희정, "나라의 정화, 조선의 표상 -일제강점기 석굴암론" (2012), 서강대학교 출판부
  3. 考古美術同人會, "慶州古蹟詩文錄" (1962), 고고미술동인간행회
  4. 고정선, "임학수 시 연구" (1997), 한국문학도서관
  5. 關野貞, "조선미술사" (2003), 동문선
  6. 권덕규, "경주행", 개벽 (1921)
  7. 기노시타 나가히로, "岡倉天心과 美術史", 미술사논단, 9, pp.307~325 (1999), 한국미술연구소
  8. 김상현, "石窟庵에 관한 文獻資料의 檢討, In 石窟庵의 諸問題" (1991), 한국정신문화연구원
  9. 전개, "한국 현대경향시의 형성", pp.2002, 김용직
  10. 민족문화추진회, "국역 신증동국여지승람" (1969), 민족문화추진회
  11. 박혜숙, "한국 현대시 흐름의 양면 탐구" (2001), 국학자료원
  12. 사토 도신, "‘近代 日本美術史’의 形成과 그 硏究動向", 미술사논단, 10, pp.211~228 (2000), 한국미술연구소
  13. 상허학회, "한국 근대문학 재생산 제도의 구조" (2007), 깊은 샘
  14. 安廓, "朝鮮의 美術", 學之光, (5), pp.47~52 (1915), 學之光發行所
  15. 오세영, "유치환" (2000), 건국대학교 출판부
  16. 柳宗悅, "石佛寺の彫刻に就いて", 藝術, 2(5) (1919)
  17. 윤여탁, "국어교육 100년사 2" (2006), 서울대학교 출판부
  18. 정시한, "산중일기" (2005), 혜안
  19. "『朝鮮古蹟圖譜: 解說篇』 5" (1917), 朝鮮總督府
  20. 趙喆濟, "慶州文集 解題(6)", 경주문화, 6, pp.311~347 (2000)
  21. 최경봉, "우리말의 탄생" (2005), 책과함께
  22. 허재영, "일제강점기 교과서 정책과 조선어과 교과서" (2009), 경지
  23. 현길언, "현진건 산문집" (2003), 한양대학교 출판부
  24. "『경향신문』 1987년 2월 17일자", 경향신문, ~ (1987)
  25. [URL]
  26. [URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)