ESG 경영을 위한 해외 조림사업의 경제성과 한계: 파라과이 시범 조림사업을 중심으로
Overseas Afforestation Projects for ESG Management: Focusing on the Paraguay Pilot Afforestation Project
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Overseas afforestation projects have recently been attracting attention due to various needs such as climate change response, ecosystem recovery, and sustainable resource management. In particular, for Korea, which is short on resources, overseas afforestation projects are necessary in terms of economic feasibility, such as stable supply of overseas wood resources. Nevertheless, the know-how accumulated domestically regarding overseas afforestation is limited. Paraguay’s overseas afforestation project, the subject of this study, is meaningful in securing all the data and know-how necessary to implement full-scale overseas afforestation projects in the future. As a result of the profitability analysis of the pilot project, there was a large difference in the mean annual increment (MAI) of the planted trees depending on the tree species and the planting area, which resulted in a large difference in the return on investment. In addition, as a result of sensitivity analysis, it was analyzed that when the planted area is expanded, the distribution effect of general management costs occurs, thereby improving profitability. These results show that selection of a plantation site with an appropriate growth environment is the most important factor in determining the success or failure of an afforestation project. In addition, the economy of scale effect through expansion of the planted area is also a factor that must be considered to improve the profitability of the afforestation project.
Abstract
Overseas afforestation projects have recently been attracting attention due to various needs such as climate change response, ecosystem recovery, and sustainable resource management. In particular, for Korea, which is short on resources, overseas afforestation projects are necessary in terms of economic feasibility, such as stable supply of overseas wood resources. Nevertheless, the know-how accumulated domestically regarding overseas afforestation is limited. Paraguay’s overseas afforestation project, the subject of this study, is meaningful in securing all the data and know-how necessary to implement full-scale overseas afforestation projects in the future. As a result of the profitability analysis of the pilot project, there was a large difference in the mean annual increment (MAI) of the planted trees depending on the tree species and the planting area, which resulted in a large difference in the return on investment. In addition, as a result of sensitivity analysis, it was analyzed that when the planted area is expanded, the distribution effect of general management costs occurs, thereby improving profitability. These results show that selection of a plantation site with an appropriate growth environment is the most important factor in determining the success or failure of an afforestation project. In addition, the economy of scale effect through expansion of the planted area is also a factor that must be considered to improve the profitability of the afforestation project.
참고문헌 (45)
- 권혜정, "국내 물류 기업ESG 경영 활성화를 위한 연구 : 심층 인터뷰를 통한ESG 경영 도입 현황 및 문제점 파악을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 31(1), pp.43~55 (2023)
- 김동현, "COVID 19Pandemic 이후 국내 목재시장 영향 분석 : 침엽수 원목, 침엽수 제재목, 합판을 중심으로", NIFOS 국제산림정책토픽, 107 (2021)
- 김병찬, "중소기업의 공동물류정책을 통한 물류합리화에 관한 연구", 한국SCM학회지, 14(2), pp.35~44 (2014)
- 김선식, "해외직접투자이론의 여러 접근방법에 대한체계적 고찰", 전문경영인연구, 13(2), pp.49~70 (2010)
- 김선식, "해외직접투자이론의 연구동향에 대한 소고", Journal of Business Economics, 42(2), pp.118~140 (2014)
- 라민툰, "한국기업의 해외직접투자 성과결정요인에 대한 종합적 메타분석 : 국내 발표논문들을대상으로", 국제경영리뷰, 22(2), pp.141~163 (2018)
- 박영렬, "한국기업의 해외직접투자 결정요인 분석", 국제지역연구, 15(3), pp.429~449 (2011)
- 한국의 대아프리카 환경개발협력 추진방안, "박영호", 대외경제정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- 변종립, "기후변화대응정책의 정책네트워크 연구 : 탄소배출권거래제 도입결정 과정을 중심으로", 에너지경제연구, 9(1), pp.151~180 (2010)
- 해외산림자원개발 종합계획(2020∼2024), "산림청", ~ (2019)
- 산림청, "임산물 수출입통계", ~ (2023)
- 서영완, "피지공화국의 해외조림 투자분석에 관한 연구", 한국사진지리학회지, 25(4), pp.27~37 (2015)
- 성연주, "한국 기업의 해외직접투자 결정요인 : TPP 국가를 중심으로", 국제경영리뷰, 21(1), pp.49~68 (2017)
- 소순진, "해외조림투자의 경제적 타당성 분석 : 파라과이 동부지역 Caaguazu 주를 중심으로", 농업생명과학연구, 51(5), pp.69~80 (2017)
- 수역훤, "중력모형을 이용한 한국의 해외직접투자 결정요인 분석", 국제경영리뷰, 18(2), pp.147~163 (2014)
- 신원섭, "해외산림자원개발 현황과 투자활성화 전략", 통상법률, 10, pp.457~467 (2015)
- 염성규, "군수 실무자의 ESG 인식이 지속가능성에 미치는 영향 : 미래⋅즉각적 결과고려의 조절효과를 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 31(1), pp.57~76 (2023)
- 유소미, "해외조림사업 방향성 모색을 위한 인도의 A", R CDM 사업현황분석 및 평가, 2021, pp.12(5), 443~460
- 이상엽, "해외조림 CDM 사업 추진을 위한 접근방안", 농업경영⋅정책연구, 34(2), pp.402~421 (2007)
- 이상윤, "물류기업의ESG 경영이 기업가치와 부도가능성에 미치는 영향", 로지스틱스연구, 32(1), pp.79~90 (2024)
- 이정숙, "한⋅베트남 임업(林業)분야 협력 실태 및전망연구", 베트남연구, 9, pp.95~128 (2009)
- 장혜지, "해외직접투자의 성과요인에 관한 연구 : 중국 진출 한국기업을 중심으로", 국제경영연구, 16(3), pp.27~64 (2005)
- 전주성, "한국의 해외직접투자가 수출에미치는 영향", 무역학회지, 40(4), pp.287~309 (2015)
- 전태영, "해외직접투자 규모의 결정에 영향을 미치는 요인", 경영학연구, 33(3), pp.865~889 (2004)
- 채종오, "한국의 탄소배출권 거래제 시행1년 후 현황과 개선방안 : EU 배출권 거래제와 비교를통하여", 한국기후변화학회지, 7(1), pp.41~ (2016)
- 최승필, "탄소배출권 제도설계에 대한 법제도적 검토 : 유럽의 탄소배출권제도를 통한 고찰을 중심으로", 환경법연구, 31(2), pp.171~208 (2009)
- 파라과이 시범조림사업 ESG 보고서, "한국임업진흥원", ~ (2022)
- 환경부, "2030 국가온실가스감축 기본로드맵 수정안", ~ (2018)
- 홍성태, "공급망 리스크가 국가 물류 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구 : 경제협력개발기구 회원국의 물류성과지수를 활용하여", 한국생산관리학회지, 34(1), pp.97~110 (2023)
- Bastin, J. F., "The global tree restoration potential", Science, 364, pp.76~79 (2019)
- Brown, C., "Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system", Nature Climate Change, 9, pp.203~208 (2019)
- Brunet-Navarro, P., "Effect of cascade use on the carbon balance of the German and European wood sectors", Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, pp.137~146 (2018)
- Carlsson, D., "Supply chain management in forestry––case studies at Södra Cell AB", European Journal of Operational Research, 163(3), pp.589~616 (2005)
- Chinese, D., "Design of forest biofuel supply chains", International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5(5), pp.525~550 (2009)
- Doelman, J. C., "Afforestation for climate change mitigation : Potentials, risks and tradeoffs", Global Change Biology, 26, pp.1576~1591 (2020)
- Global Forest Resources Assessment, "FAO", ~ (2015)
- Foster, E. J., "Commercial afforestation can deliver effective climate change mitigation under multiple decarbonisation pathways", Nature Communications, 12, pp.1~12 (2021)
- Grassi, G., "The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation", Nature Climate Change, 7, pp.220~226 (2017)
- Howard, C., "Wood product carbon substitution benefits : a critical review of assumptions", Carbon Balance and Management, 16, pp.9~ (2021)
- Kurz, W. A., "Climate change mitigation through forest sector activities : principles, potential and prioritiese", Unasylva, 67, pp.61~67 (2016)
- Lewis, S. L., "Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon", Nature, 568, pp.25~28 (2019)
- Li, Y., "Local cooling and warming effects of forests based on satellite observations", Nature Communications, 6, pp.1~8 (2015)
- Sikkema, R., "How can the ambitious goals for the EU’s future bioeconomy be supported by sustainable and efficient wood sourcing practices?", Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32, pp.551~558 (2017)
- Sterman, J., "Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy", Environmental Research Letters, 13(1), pp.015007~ (2018)
- Taskhiri, M. S., "Sustainable logistics network for wood flow considering cascade utilisation", Journal of Cleaner Production, 110, pp.25~39 (2016)