농업, 임업 및 어업 종사자에서의 프리젠티즘:제6차 근로환경조사를 바탕으로
Presenteeism in Agricultural, Forestry and Fishing Workers:Based on the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Presenteeism is known to be a much more economically damaging social cost than disease rest while going to work despite physical pain. Since COVID-19, social discussions on the sickness benefit have been taking place as a countermeasure against presenteeism, and in particular, farmers and fishermen do not have an institutional mechanism for livelihood support when a disease other than work occurs. This study attempted to examine the relationship between agricultural, fishing, and forestry workers and presenteeism using the 6th Korean Work Conditions Survey. Methods: From October 2020 to January 2021, data from the 6th working conditions survey conducted on 17 cities and provinces in Korea were used, and a total of 34,981 people were studied. Control variables were gender, age, self-health assessment, education level, night work, shift work, monthly income, occupation, working hours per week, and employment status. Results: As a result of the analysis, farmers and fishermen showed the characteristics of the self-employed and the elderly, and as a result of the regression analysis, when farmers and fishermen analyzed the relationship with presenteeism tendency compared to other industry workers, farmers and fishermen increased by 23% compared to other industry groups. Conclusion: This study is significant in that it has representation by utilizing the 6th working conditions survey and objectively suggests the need for a sickness benefit for farmers and fishermen who may be overlooked in the sickness benefit.
Abstract
Objectives: Presenteeism is known to be a much more economically damaging social cost than disease rest while going to work despite physical pain. Since COVID-19, social discussions on the sickness benefit have been taking place as a countermeasure against presenteeism, and in particular, farmers and fishermen do not have an institutional mechanism for livelihood support when a disease other than work occurs. This study attempted to examine the relationship between agricultural, fishing, and forestry workers and presenteeism using the 6th Korean Work Conditions Survey. Methods: From October 2020 to January 2021, data from the 6th working conditions survey conducted on 17 cities and provinces in Korea were used, and a total of 34,981 people were studied. Control variables were gender, age, self-health assessment, education level, night work, shift work, monthly income, occupation, working hours per week, and employment status. Results: As a result of the analysis, farmers and fishermen showed the characteristics of the self-employed and the elderly, and as a result of the regression analysis, when farmers and fishermen analyzed the relationship with presenteeism tendency compared to other industry workers, farmers and fishermen increased by 23% compared to other industry groups. Conclusion: This study is significant in that it has representation by utilizing the 6th working conditions survey and objectively suggests the need for a sickness benefit for farmers and fishermen who may be overlooked in the sickness benefit.
참고문헌 (17)
- Johns G, "Presenteeism in the workplace : A review and research agenda", J Organ Behav, 31(4), pp.519~542 (2010)
- Leka S, "Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology, Volume 2: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice (Vol. 1)", pp.204~215 (2012), John Wiley & Sons
- Kinman G, "Presenteeism during the COVID-19 pandemic : risks and solutions", Occup Med(Lond), 71(6-7), pp.243~244 (2021)
- Kim SJ, "No matter who is sick, can't rest : The current status of sick leave and presenteeism in Korea and implications for the discussion on the introduction of sickness benefit", Health and Welfare Issue & Focus, 391, pp.1~10 (2020)[DOI]
- Kim MH, "The Progress in the Implementation of Sickness Benefit After Covid-19 and Its Implications", Health and Welfare Policy Forum, (4), pp.50~66 (2023)[DOI]
- "sickness benefit system"[URL]
- Lee KS, "The Legal and the Official Management System Status of the Agricultural Disease, Injury, and Accidents of Korean", Journal of Agricultural Medicine and Community Health, 31(3), pp.219~236 (2006)
- Siqueira VB, "Prevalence of Presenteeism in Agricultural Workers : Systematic Review", Workplace Health Saf, 71(7), pp.318~324 (2023)[DOI]
- Hwang J, "Association between insomnia and absenteeism or presenteeism among Korean employees", Ann Occup Environ Med, 34, pp.e41~ (2022)[DOI]
- Choi YE, "The korean working conditions survey (KWCS) utilization for identifying occupations poorly-protected by occupational health management", pp.2020
- Schultz AB, "The cost and impact of health conditions on presenteeism to employers : a review of the literature", Pharmacoeconomics, 27(5), pp.365~378 (2009)[DOI]
- Kigozi J, "The Estimation and Inclusion of Presenteeism Costs in Applied Economic Evaluation : A Systematic Review", Value Health, 20(3), pp.496~506 (2017)[DOI]
- Cooksey R, "The Cost of Ankylosing Spondylitis in the UK Using Linked Routine and Patient-Reported Survey Data", PLoS One, 10(7), pp.e0126105~ (2015)[DOI]
- Arcury TA, "Work safety climate, musculoskeletal discomfort, working while injured, and depression among migrant farmworkers in North Carolina", Am J Public Health, 2(Suppl 2), pp.S272~S278 (2012)[DOI]
- Siqueira VB, "Presenteeism among fruit farm workers in Northeast Brazil : cross-sectional study", Ind Health, 60(6), pp.525~534 (2022)[DOI]
- Nagata T, "Total healthrelated costs due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and medical and pharmaceutical expenses in Japanese employers", J Occup Environ Med, 60(5), pp.e273~e280 (2018)
- Bak, J., "The Social Security of Farmers in Poland and in Selected EU Member States", Olsztyn Economic Journal, 15(3), pp.239~249 (2020)