본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

양심의 자유에서의 양심 개념의 비교적 고찰

A Comparison of Conscience Concept in the Freedom of Conscience

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article aims to study the concept of conscience which is premise in every spiritual activity of humane being. The humane conscience is affected by the religious belief, the spiritual thinking and the thinking about learning or art. Therefore the clause on the freedom of conscience can deal with including the freedom of thought. The freedom of conscience was separated from the freedom of religion, so nowadays the former protects the secular life and the latter does religious faith of the humane being. Although the both of them are prescribed on the same article, they have quite a different meanings. The concept of conscience can divide into two parts, private conscience and public conscience or the subjective conscience and the objective conscience according as whether it involves a certain contents about the conscience. The ground of conscience has been unfolded variously from ethicalㆍmoral one till religiousㆍsociological and philosophical one etc. The conscience is regarded as ethicalㆍmoral awareness of the humane being. The extension to the ground of conscience doesn’t mean to allow what is beyond the law or order. So the resisting conscience and the opposing one must not be beyond legalism. The conscience of article 19 in constitution is not the same the public conscience that has a member of the National Assembly or a judge but the personal conscience. The Supreme Court hangs on to the judgement denying the freedom of conscience in the accidents related with the conscience. The Constitutional Court suggests in a series of decisions that “Conscience includes inner valuableㆍethical judgement on personal character building more extensively as well as a world view, one’s view of life, principle, belief”The concept of conscience must be understood as the subjective conscientious theory. Therefore the legal discussion about the conscience must be started not from the general law, the general moral and the universality etc., but from the uppermost value judgment, the final judgmental organ and so on.

Abstract

This article aims to study the concept of conscience which is premise in every spiritual activity of humane being. The humane conscience is affected by the religious belief, the spiritual thinking and the thinking about learning or art. Therefore the clause on the freedom of conscience can deal with including the freedom of thought. The freedom of conscience was separated from the freedom of religion, so nowadays the former protects the secular life and the latter does religious faith of the humane being. Although the both of them are prescribed on the same article, they have quite a different meanings. The concept of conscience can divide into two parts, private conscience and public conscience or the subjective conscience and the objective conscience according as whether it involves a certain contents about the conscience. The ground of conscience has been unfolded variously from ethicalㆍmoral one till religiousㆍsociological and philosophical one etc. The conscience is regarded as ethicalㆍmoral awareness of the humane being. The extension to the ground of conscience doesn’t mean to allow what is beyond the law or order. So the resisting conscience and the opposing one must not be beyond legalism. The conscience of article 19 in constitution is not the same the public conscience that has a member of the National Assembly or a judge but the personal conscience. The Supreme Court hangs on to the judgement denying the freedom of conscience in the accidents related with the conscience. The Constitutional Court suggests in a series of decisions that “Conscience includes inner valuableㆍethical judgement on personal character building more extensively as well as a world view, one’s view of life, principle, belief”The concept of conscience must be understood as the subjective conscientious theory. Therefore the legal discussion about the conscience must be started not from the general law, the general moral and the universality etc., but from the uppermost value judgment, the final judgmental organ and so on.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 강경근, "헌법" (2004), 법문사
  2. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2005), 법문사
  3. 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2000), 박영사
  4. 김문현, "良心의 自由 小考", 법학논집, 6(1), pp.1~21 (2001), 법학연구소
  5. 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2005), 박영사
  6. 김철수, "저항권소고", 서울대학교 법학, 20(2) (1980)
  7. 나달숙, "헌법(1)" (2008), 청목출판사
  8. 나달숙, "양심의 자유와 양심적 병역거부에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  9. 문홍주, "한국헌법" (1987), 해암사
  10. 박효종, "Thomas Aquinas와 Bonaventura에 있어서의 양심", pp.1975
  11. 윤명선, "시민적 불복종의 법리, in 법치국가와 시민불복종" (2001), 법문사
  12. 이재승, "인권의 기초개념으로서의 양심", 법학논총, 14 (2002), 국민대학교 법학연구소
  13. 이희승, "한국어대사전" (1986), 삼성문화사
  14. 장영수, "헌법학Ⅱ 기본권론" (2003), 홍문사
  15. 장 이뽈리뜨, "헤겔의 정신현상학Ⅱ" (1994), 문예출판사
  16. 최대권, "양심의 자유와 사죄광고", 법학, 39(3) (1998), 서울대학교법학연구소
  17. 한스 벨첼, "자연법과 실질적 정의" (2001), 삼영사
  18. 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법" (2004), 법문사
  19. 宮澤俊義, "憲法Ⅱ" (1971), 有斐閣
  20. 法學協會, "註釋日本國憲法(上)" (1953), 有斐閣
  21. 小林直樹, "憲法講義 上" (1980), 東京大學出版會
  22. 笹川紀, "精神的自由權, 憲法講義 2, 基本的人權" (1979), 有斐閣
  23. Arndt, A., "Das Grundrecht der Kriegsdienstverweigerung" (1957), NJW
  24. Bäumlin, R., "Das Grundrecht der Gewissensfreiheit, in VVDStRL 28" (1970)
  25. Bethge, H., "Gewissensfreiheit, Hand-buch des Staatsrecht Bd. Ⅳ" (1989), C.F. Müller
  26. Borowski, M., "Die Glaubens-und Gewissensfreiheit des Grundgesetzes" (2006), Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. K
  27. Dworkin, "A Matter of Principle" (1985), Harvard Univ. Press
  28. Herzog, "Grundgesetz Kommentar" (1988), München
  29. Jefferson Powell, "Constitutional Conscience: The Moral Dimension of Judicial Decision" (2008), The University of Chicago Press, Ltd
  30. Luhmann, N., "Die Gewissensfreiheit und das Gewissen, in AöR 90" (1965)
  31. Maunz, "Grundgesetz Kommentar" (1988), München
  32. Rawls, "A Theory of Justice" (1971), Belknap
  33. Scholler, H., "Gewissen, Gesetz und Rechtsstaat" (1969), DÖV

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)