라틴아메리카 대통령제에 대한 재평가 -브라질 대통령제를 중심으로-
The Revaluation for Presidentialism in Latin America -Focusing on the Brazilian Presidentilism-
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Latin American countries chose the Presidentialism in the course of modernization. These countries experienced unstable constitutional system for years and also had a difficulty in solidifying democracy. On the contrary European countries of Parliamentarism had built a stable constitutional system. It is true the argument that the Presidentialism is inferior to the parliamentarism has been supported by this fact. In recent days, however, the constitutional government system of Latin American countries is quite well operated with a rapid progress of democracy. Brazil could be a typical example. Braizil is making a remarkable growth of the market economy, mature democracy and regime change between ruling and opposition parties. Therefore the argument for the Parliamentarism based on the historical experience of Latin America is more likely to lose a ground. In the Presidentialism of multiparty country, to discuss how to secure the stability of political situation, how to evaluate the combination of residentialism and Proportional representation and how to manage the political situation when the president doesn’t get enough support of dominant assembly will be more constructive than to simply compare the Presidentialism to the Parliamentarism. And this productive discussion will draw wisdom from the historical experience of Latin America who had been through the political upheaval.
Abstract
Latin American countries chose the Presidentialism in the course of modernization. These countries experienced unstable constitutional system for years and also had a difficulty in solidifying democracy. On the contrary European countries of Parliamentarism had built a stable constitutional system. It is true the argument that the Presidentialism is inferior to the parliamentarism has been supported by this fact. In recent days, however, the constitutional government system of Latin American countries is quite well operated with a rapid progress of democracy. Brazil could be a typical example. Braizil is making a remarkable growth of the market economy, mature democracy and regime change between ruling and opposition parties. Therefore the argument for the Parliamentarism based on the historical experience of Latin America is more likely to lose a ground. In the Presidentialism of multiparty country, to discuss how to secure the stability of political situation, how to evaluate the combination of residentialism and Proportional representation and how to manage the political situation when the president doesn’t get enough support of dominant assembly will be more constructive than to simply compare the Presidentialism to the Parliamentarism. And this productive discussion will draw wisdom from the historical experience of Latin America who had been through the political upheaval.
참고문헌 (54)
- 權寧星, "憲法學原論" (2005), 法文社
- 강원택, "대통령제, 내각제와 이원정부제: 통치형태의 특성과 운영의 원리" (2006), 인간사랑
- 김정현, "이원정부제" (2009), 금붕어
- 金哲洙, "憲法學槪論" (2003), 博英社
- 성낙인, "憲法學" (2010), 法文社
- 신명순, "비교정치" (2003), 나남
- 鄭宗燮, "헌법학원론 제7판" (2012), 박영사
- 鄭宗燮, "憲法과 政治制度" (2010), 博英社
- 이원삼, "이슬람법이론 및 금융법제" (2009), 한국법제연구원
- 許營, "韓國憲法論" (2012), 博英社
- 강경희, "현재 브라질 대통령제의 특징에 관한 고찰 : ‘강화된’‘연합형’대통령제", 오토피아, 22(2) (2007)
- 金浩鎭, "軍部支配 국가의 脫군부화 모형－브라질과 한국－", 한국정치학회보, 20(1) (1986)
- 김정현, "분점정부에 관한 헌법적 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2011
- 김정현, "대통령 결선투표제에 관한 고찰", 법학논고, (40), pp.159~186 (2012), 법학연구원
- 양동훈, "군부와 민주화 : 브라질과 아르헨티나 비교분석", 라틴아메리카연구, 3 (1990)
- 양동훈, "남미의 인권유산 정리정책과 민주주의: 비교정치의 시각에서", 라틴아메리카연구, 20(4), pp.5~39 (2007), 한국라틴아메리카학회
- 양동훈, "신민주체제의 경제개혁과 민주주의: 브라질과 아르헨티나의 사례", 라틴아메리카연구, 19(2), pp.37~68 (2006), 한국라틴아메리카학회
- 양동훈, "브라질의 신민주체제와 정치부패의 문제:정치체제 접근", 라틴아메리카연구, 16(2), pp.263~313 (2003), 한국라틴아메리카학회
- 양동훈, "민주화와 권위주의체제 유산의 청산문제: 브라질과 아르헨티나의 비교", 라틴아메리카연구, 9 (1996)
- 오삼교, "브라질의 새로운 좌파 정치：룰라의 당선과 노동자당의 변화", 현상과 인식, 27(1, pp.2) (2003), 118~142[DOI]
- 陰善滭, "大統領制와 比例代表選擧制에 관한 연구 序說-라틴 아메리카의 立法例를 중심으로-, In 憲法規範과 憲法現實-權寧星敎授停年紀念論文集-" (1999), 법문사
- 이성형, "룰라정부의 브라질: BRICs의 밝은 미래는 있는가?", 역사비평, (76), pp.270~306 (2006), 역사문제연구소
- 張錫權, "獨逸議院內閣制의 特徵", 法學論叢, 20 (1995), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 장성훈, "브라질 헌정체제와 불안정한 민주주의", 한국정당학회보, 6(1), pp.133~164 (2007), 한국정당학회
- 정종섭, "韓國에서의 大統領制政府와 持續可能性 - 憲法政策論的 接近 -", 서울대학교 법학, 53(1), pp.447~496 (2012), 법학연구소
- 정진영, "브라질 대통령제와 정치적 불안정, In 한국의권력구조 논쟁Ⅱ: 권력구조의 운영과 변화" (2000), 풀빛
- 조돈문, "브라질 노동자당의 집권과 계급적 기초", 동향과 전망, (72), pp.287~325 (2008), 한국사회과학연구회
- 최대원, "브라질의 경제민주화 헌법과 경제선순환 예산법제 소개", 최신외국법제정보, (9) (2012)
- 최대원, "브라질의 경제민주화 관련 법제 및 정책", 최신외국법제정보 (2012)
- Mettenheim, Kurt von, "Presidential institutions and democratic politics: comparing regional and national contexts" (1997), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Linz, Juan J, "The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives" (1994), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Linz, Juan J., "The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The case of Latin America" (1994), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Sartori, Giovanni, "Comparative Constitutional Engineering : an Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes" (1997), New York University Press
- Shugart, Matthew Soberg, "Presidents and assemblies : constitutional design and electoral dynamics" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Barczak, Monica, "Executive and Legislatures in Ecuador, In Divided Government in Comparative Perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Blondel, Jean, "Dual Leadership in the Contemporary World, In Parliamentary versus Presidential Government" (1992), Oxford University Press
- Horowitz, Donald, "Comparing Democratic System, In The global Resurgence of Democracy" (1993), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Klesner, Joseph L., "Divided Government in Mexico’s Presidentialist Regime: The 1997-2000 Experience, In Divided Government in Comparative Perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Lamounier, Bolivar, "Brazil: Toward Parliamentarism, In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America" (1994), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Lamounier, Bolivar, "Presidentialism and Parliamentarism in Brazil, In Parliamentary versus Presidential Government" (1992), Oxford University Press
- Lijphart, A, "Constitutional Choices for New Democracies", Journal of Democracy, 2(1) (1991)
- Linz, Juan J, "The Perils of Presidentialism, In The global Resurgence of Democracy" (1993), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Linz, Juan J, "The Virtues of Parliamentarism, In The global Resurgence of Democracy" (1993), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Lopes, Juarez B, "Obstacles to Economic Reform in Brazil, In Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America" (1996), Westview Press
- Mainwaring, Scott, "Presidentialism, Mutipartisl, and Democracy : The Difficult Combination", Comparative Political Studies, 26(2) (1993)
- Mainwaring, Scott, "Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy : A Critical Appraisal", Comparative Politics, 29(4) (1997)
- Mainwaring, Scott, "Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil, In Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Mainwaring, Scott, "Brazil: Weak Parties, Fekless Democracy, In Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America" (1995), Stanford University Press
- Mainwaring, Scott, "Latin America : Eight Lessons for Governance", Journal of Democracy, 19(3) (2009)
- Martin., "The Centrality of political Culture, In The global Resurgence of Democracy" (1993), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Mettenheim, Kurt Von, "Brazlian Presidentialism: Shifting Comparative Perspectives from Erope to the Americas, In Presidential institutions and democratic politics: comparing regional and national contexts" (1997), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Pereira, Carlos, "The Surprising Success of Multiparty Presidentialism", Journal of Democracy, 23(3) (2012)
- Power, Timothy J., "Brazilian Democracy as a late bloomer: Reevaluating the Regime in the Cardoso-Lula Era", Latin American Research Review (2010)
- Sola, Lourdes, "Politics, Markets, and Society in Brazil, In Latin America’s struggle for democracy" (2008), The Johns Hopkins University Press