본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한 민법의 빌리기계약의 특징과 평가

The Traits and Evaluation of Lease of an Irreplaceable Article(BILLIKI Contract) in North Korean Civil Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Lease is vice important in the modern daily life likewise a sales contract is priory important in a law of contract, and also Lease has an irreplaceable article as an object. North Korea enacted a kind of law which is called Lease that has the same character of Lease and Loan for Use in Civil Law of South Korea. On the other hand North Korea established the rule of land rental contract in Land lease Act which activates in a special region only and the rule is a special provision to Rental Contract of civil law. Therefore, this paper is seeking first the traits and main points of the related provisions of lease and Lease, and then it considers the same and the difference of lease of an irreplaceable article of South Korea and North Korea both. Firstly North Korean Civil Law has the character of public law for an approval of the higher authority should be obtained in Lease of the fixed property while the lease of an irreplaceable article is divided into two parts according to reciprocity that the former is Lease and the latter is Loan for Use in South Korean Civil Law. Being different from South Korean Civil Law, there isn’t those provisions in North Korean Civil Law which are Duration of Contract, Lessee’s Right to Demand Reimbursement, Lessee’s Right to Demand Renewal of Contract and Right to Demand Purchase of Building, and Lessee’s Right to Demand Purchase of Accessories. And the provisions of Assignment of Right of Lease and Sub-lease are so simple comeparing to the one of South Korea. Secondly the lease of irreplaceable article of North Korean Civil Law has similar points of South Korean Civil Law as the following;A lessee is liable to repair small damage of the object in the liability of repair, and in a big part’s case it is lesser’s liability. A lesser is liable to hand over the object to a lessee to use properly, and a lessee has liability of rental payment and obligation to return the object after using it. Also it is another similar points that is lender’s liability for warranty, a lessee’s claim of occupation protection, Concurrent Performance between lesser’s the return of lease deposits and lessee’s the return of the object. All the similar points between South Korean Civil Law and North Korean Civil Law are showing possibility to access each other, and it could be the potential base for the civil law of the unified Korea.

Abstract

Lease is vice important in the modern daily life likewise a sales contract is priory important in a law of contract, and also Lease has an irreplaceable article as an object. North Korea enacted a kind of law which is called Lease that has the same character of Lease and Loan for Use in Civil Law of South Korea. On the other hand North Korea established the rule of land rental contract in Land lease Act which activates in a special region only and the rule is a special provision to Rental Contract of civil law. Therefore, this paper is seeking first the traits and main points of the related provisions of lease and Lease, and then it considers the same and the difference of lease of an irreplaceable article of South Korea and North Korea both. Firstly North Korean Civil Law has the character of public law for an approval of the higher authority should be obtained in Lease of the fixed property while the lease of an irreplaceable article is divided into two parts according to reciprocity that the former is Lease and the latter is Loan for Use in South Korean Civil Law. Being different from South Korean Civil Law, there isn’t those provisions in North Korean Civil Law which are Duration of Contract, Lessee’s Right to Demand Reimbursement, Lessee’s Right to Demand Renewal of Contract and Right to Demand Purchase of Building, and Lessee’s Right to Demand Purchase of Accessories. And the provisions of Assignment of Right of Lease and Sub-lease are so simple comeparing to the one of South Korea. Secondly the lease of irreplaceable article of North Korean Civil Law has similar points of South Korean Civil Law as the following;A lessee is liable to repair small damage of the object in the liability of repair, and in a big part’s case it is lesser’s liability. A lesser is liable to hand over the object to a lessee to use properly, and a lessee has liability of rental payment and obligation to return the object after using it. Also it is another similar points that is lender’s liability for warranty, a lessee’s claim of occupation protection, Concurrent Performance between lesser’s the return of lease deposits and lessee’s the return of the object. All the similar points between South Korean Civil Law and North Korean Civil Law are showing possibility to access each other, and it could be the potential base for the civil law of the unified Korea.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김재형, "민법총칙 제8판(전면개정)" (2012), 박영사
  2. 김재형, "민법총칙 제9판" (2013), 박영사
  3. 김영규, "남북한 물권법의 차이점", 법학논총, 33(1), pp.207~240 (2009), 법학연구소
  4. 김영규, "북한 민법의 물권제도일반과 그 변용", 법학논총, 36(1), pp.609~644 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  5. "공화국채권채무에 대한 연구" (2005), 김일성종합대학출판사
  6. "심의용 민법 Ⅰ" (1973), 김일성종합대학출판사
  7. 김재교, "우리나라에서의 계약제도는 인민경제계획 수행을 촉진시키며 인민들의 물질 문화적 수요의 충족을 보장하는 법적 수단이다", 법학론문집, (9) (1960), 과학원 경제법학연구소
  8. 김형배, "채권각론(계약법)" (2003), 박영사
  9. 리광천, "계약상 제의와 그 법적 효력과 구속력", 정치법률연구, (6) (2004), 과학백과사전출판사
  10. 리광천, "동의의 법적 효력과 특징", 정치법률연구, (7) (2004), 과학백과사전출판사
  11. 중국의 민법통칙연구 : 중국법연구(1), "문준조", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1991)
  12. 법무부, "통일법무기본자료(남북관계)" (2010), 법무부 법무실 통일법무과
  13. 사회과학원 법학연구소, "민사법사전" (1997), 사회안전부출판사
  14. 서창섭, "지방 산업공장들의 활동과 관련한 민법적 규제", 법학론문집, (9) (1960), 과학원 경제법학연구소
  15. 송덕수, "채권법총론" (2013), 박영사
  16. 신영, "북한민법 40년과 그 동향", 북한법률행정논총, 8 (1990), 고려대학교 법학연구소
  17. 윤종철, "민법학 2" (1985), 김일성종합대학출판사
  18. 이종복, "북한 채권법의 개관 : 1973년 심의용 민법(1)을 중심으로, In 사법관계와 자율" (1993), 이종복교수논문집간행위원회
  19. 장철익, "북한의 ‘부동산관리법’ 제정의 의미와 평가", 제163회 북한법연구회 월례발표회 발표문 (2011), 북한법연구회
  20. 정동호, "북한 민법상의 계약원리와 그 특수성", 법학논총, 2 (1985), 한양대학교 법학연구소
  21. 정상훈, "리스(임대차)방식의 일반적 원리에 대한 연구", 경제연구, (124) (2004), 과학백과사전출판사
  22. 참심원들에게 주는 자료, "공화국 민법의 기본문제", 민주사법, (9) (1959)
  23. 최달곤, "북한민법의 변화와 그 내용상 특징", 북한 (1987)
  24. 최달곤, "묵한 계약법의 내용과 특색", 북한의 법과 법이론 (1988), 경남대학교 극동문제연구소
  25. 末川博, "契約法(上)" (1977), 大源書籍
  26. 野村好弘, "中國民法の硏究" (1987), 學陽書房
  27. 野村好弘, "中國における民事法および交通法の動向", ジュリスト, (965) (1990)
  28. Братусь С.Н., "Комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу РСФСР" (1982), Юридическая литература

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)