中国21世纪的民事司法改革
Reformation of China's Civil Judicial System in the 21st Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
司法制度(judicial system),是指一个国家的法院组织体系,以及有关法院的性质、任务、组织原则和工作制度的法律规范的总和。中国现代的民事司法制度初步定型于20世纪70年代末至80年代初期,由《中华人民共和国宪法》《中华人民共和国人民法院组织法》《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》 等共同构成其规范基础。 20世纪70年代以后,世界上西方和东方主要国家普遍掀起了民事司法改革的浪潮。在英、美、加、澳、法、德等西方国家,民事司法改革运动普遍被冠名为“接近正义”或深受其影响。“接近正义”(Access to Justice)一词最初源于“佛罗伦萨计划”,即以佛罗伦萨为中心的几项研究计划。 “接近正义”与其说是新理论的创设,不如说是对欧美国家在20世纪70年进行的民事司法改革尝试的阶段性总结。 同样是在20世纪70年代,中国正在酝酿一场伟大的改革运动。1978年12月,中国共产党第十一届中央委员会第三次全体会议在北京召开,作出了把党和国家工作中心转移到经济建设上来、实行改革开放的历史性决策。在改革开放初期定型的民事司法制度,随着改革开放的推进,民事司法制度很快出现了一些不适应性。大约自1987年起,部分地方法院就开始围绕“强化当事人举证责任”展开讨论和改革探索,其后改革沿着“强化当事人举证责任——庭审方式改革——审判方式改革——审判制度改革——诉讼制度改革——司法制度改革”的轨迹不断发展, 进入21世纪后形成了声势浩大的司法改革运动,标志就是2003年在中央直接领导下设立的“中央司法体制改革领导小组”。2012年以来,随着中国特色社会主义进入新时代,中国的民事司法改革也呈现全局化和纵深推进的趋势。本文试图在对中国的民事司法改革历史进程进行概括的基础上,重点讨论改革的主要议题与展开逻辑,以及中国与欧美民事司法改革的异同,阐释以“司法为民”为主题的中国式民事司法改革的特质。
Abstract
The judicial system refers to the totality of legal norms regarding the organizational system of a country's courts and the nature, duties, organizational principles, and work systems of the courts. China's modern civil judicial system is based on the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, the Basic Law of the People's Courts of the People's Republic of China, and the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, which were enacted in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Since the 1970s, major Western and Eastern countries around the world have comprehensively reformed their civil judicial systems. In Western countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, France, and Germany, the civil law reform movement is generally referred to as “Access to Justice” or has been greatly influenced by it. The term “Access to Justice” originally originated from the “Florence Project,” a research project centered in Florence. Rather than being the creation of a new theory, “Access to Justice” is a step-by-step summary of the civil law reform attempts made by European and American countries in the 1970s. Even in the 1970s, China was carrying out a major reform movement. In December 1978, the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing, making the historic decision to shift the focus of the party and the state to economic construction and implement reform and opening up. The civil judicial system, which was established in the early days of reform and opening up, began to show some incompatibility as the reform and opening up progressed. Starting around 1987, some local courts began discussing and exploring reforms centered on “strengthening the burden of proof of the parties.” Since then, it has continued to develop in the order of “strengthening the burden of proof of the parties - reforming the court trial method - reforming the trial system - reforming the litigation system - reforming the judicial system,” and a large-scale judicial reform movement has been formed since the 21st century. Its symbol is the “Central Judicial System Reform Leading Small Group”, which was established in 2003 under the direct guidance of the central government. Since 2012, as socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era, China's civil judicial reform has also shown a trend of globalization and deepening development. This article outlines the historical process of China's civil judicial system reform, focuses on the major issues of reform and development logic, examines the similarities and differences between China, Europe, and the United States' civil judicial system reform, and attempts to interpret the characteristics of China's civil judicial system reform with the theme of “Judicial System for People.”
참고문헌 (30)
- "中华人民共和国宪法", ~
- M. Cappelletti, "Fundmental Gurantees of the Parties in Civil Litigation: Studies in National", International and Comparative Law (1973), Oceana Publications
- 莫诺⋅卡佩莱蒂, "福利国家与接近正义" (2000), 法律出版社
- 王德新, "民事司法改革的中国范式", pp.4~12 (2023), 中国社会科学出版社
- 曹漫之, "排除干扰 严格实施民事诉讼法", 法学, (4) (1982)
- 冯尔泰, "坚持群众路线与法制原则的统一", 法学, (4) (1982)
- 张玲元, "我国 “民事诉讼法(试行)”的特点", 政法论坛, (2) (1982)
- 张友渔, "论我国民事诉讼法的基本原则和特点", 法学研究, (3) (1982)
- 胡锦涛, "坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进, 为全面建成小康社会而奋斗——在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告", 求是, (22) (2012)
- "人民日报", ~
- 习近平, "论坚持全面依法治国" (2020), 中央文献出版社
- 习近平, "论坚持全面依法治国", pp.248~ (2020), 中央文献出版社
- 习近平, "论坚持全面依法治国", pp.59~ (2020), 中央文献出版社
- 习近平, "坚定不移走中国特色社会主义法治道路 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家提供有力法治保障", 求是, (5) (2021)
- 张晨, "全国法院平均当场立案率达95.7%", 法治日报, ~ (2022)
- 建伟, "“3122”审案更快更廉洁", 深圳法制报, ~ (2003)
- 周强, "最高人民法院工作报告——2022年3月8日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第五次会议上", 中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报, (2) (2022)
- 王德新, "家事审判改革的理念革新与路径调适", 当代法学, (1) (2018)
- "人民检察院提起公益诉讼试点工作实施办法", ~ (2015)
- 季卫东, "法制与调解的悖论≫, ≪法学研究≫1991年第5期;李浩: ≪民事审判中的调审分离", 法学研究, (4) (1996)
- 景汉朝, "经济审判方式改革若干问题研究", 法学研究, (5) (1997)
- Christine Parker, "Just Lawyers: Regulation and Access to Justice", pp.31~ (1999), Oxford University Press
- "唐律疏议⋅名例", ~
- "后村先生大全集 卷一九三 ≪德兴县董党诉立继事≫", ~
- 孙林, "政治学核心概念与理论", pp.97~ (2017), 天津人民出版社
- G. Slapper, "The English Legal System", pp.446~ (1999), Cavendish Publishing Limited
- 张乃根, "西方法哲学史纲", pp.249~ (1993), 中国政法大学出版社
- 莫诺⋅卡佩莱蒂, "福利国家与接近正义", pp.336~ (2000), 法律出版社
- 邢益强, "从民本到民权的创造性接转——梁启超晚年民权思想之一面", 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版, (4) (2007)
- "关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议注释本", pp.9~ (1985), 人民出版社
